Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Not Ghosts

Channel

Not Ghosts

@notgho

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

180subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002367712028
TypeChannel
Username@notgho
Created29 October 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/notgho

Growth

1801841827 August 2026 — 184 subscribers8 August 2026 — 184 subscribers16 August 2026 — 183 subscribers24 August 2026 — 181 subscribers1 September 2026 — 180 subscribers7 August 20261 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 25 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 179–185 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 12:14180-1
24 Aug 2026, 20:48181-2
16 Aug 2026, 08:18183-1
8 Aug 2026, 12:30184no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:33184first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 29 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
46s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

528 reactions across 14 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👻12323.3%
👌9918.8%
🔥8415.9%
👍5510.4%
🤔468.71%
🤷‍♂305.68%
❤‍🔥244.55%
👨‍💻142.65%
🤣91.70%
🍾81.52%
💊61.14%
🫡61.14%
🌚40.758%
🙏40.758%
30.568%
👎30.568%
🖕30.568%
🤮30.568%
😱20.379%
🥰20.379%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 528 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2024 to 21 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 14 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @notgho. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 October 2024 to 21 November 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Nov 2024, 04:10 UTC931 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Everything you found on TikTok is true. ❤️

👻11

13 Nov 2024, 20:03 UTC≈1,020 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Shall we watch some TikToks? But which account should we choose? 🤔

🍾8💊63

11 Nov 2024, 10:43 UTC≈1,020 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

You see, but you do not observe. 👻

👻6👍5

9 Nov 2024, 19:45 UTC≈1,080 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

👻 Who is stronger: people, machines, or those who control the machines? The second password was found and shared with everyone, which is certainly pleasing. 🫰

👨‍💻14🫡6👍5

9 Nov 2024, 11:56 UTC≈1,080 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

👻 I’m watching as you solve one riddle after another, and you’re on the right path. A hero has emerged who shared the password. ❤️ Not all words have meaning. Not every date holds a secret. Not every file stores passwords. Find what has meaning and try to connect it.

👻12👍5

9 Nov 2024, 10:16 UTC980 views18 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👻 One of you found the password and received the reward. Will there be anyone willing to share the password?

🔥12🙏4🥰2

9 Nov 2024, 09:48 UTC932 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

👻 You must share the information you found with others. One person alone can’t win the battle!

🔥13

9 Nov 2024, 04:36 UTC848 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

👻 It's no secret that this is my only channel.

👻17👎3😱2

8 Nov 2024, 20:10 UTC903 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🤔23🔥13🌚4🖕3🤮3

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @notgho. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Not Ghosts” (@notgho), 180 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/notgho.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.