Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for лимб ау 🍊

Channel

лимб ау 🍊

@noteswinterr

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,160subscribers

-221 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002025642743
TypeChannel
Username@noteswinterr
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/noteswinterr

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,1608,3838,271.512 August 2026 — 8,381 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,383 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,364 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,366 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,360 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,379 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,369 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,363 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,327 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,301 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,253 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,234 subscribers29 September 2026 — 8,160 subscribers12 August 202629 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 48 days, net -221. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,127–8,416 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Sept 2026, 14:228,160-74
15 Sept 2026, 21:408,234-19
12 Sept 2026, 06:558,253-48
7 Sept 2026, 17:588,301-26
2 Sept 2026, 11:178,327-36
30 Aug 2026, 11:138,363-6
27 Aug 2026, 20:028,369-10
25 Aug 2026, 03:528,379+19
21 Aug 2026, 18:298,360-6
18 Aug 2026, 21:038,366+2
15 Aug 2026, 19:078,364-19
12 Aug 2026, 16:248,383+2
12 Aug 2026, 04:008,381first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 36 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

7,314 reactions across 35 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 59875389988289957604,53862.0%
custom 53863906112994441432,77638.0%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,314 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 35 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @noteswinterr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 36 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC725 views137 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

когда главы.

custom 5386390611299444143115custom 598753899882899576022

28 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC945 views77 reactionsread 28 August 2026

не забывайте о замечательной ау🐰

custom 598753899882899576059custom 538639061129944414318

28 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC≈1,180 views173 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

вы как?

custom 5987538998828995760143custom 538639061129944414330

28 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC862 views46 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @banghoherePhoto

ㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤㅤКрис совсем не планировал проводить лето в деревне: отсутствие интернета приводит его в ужас, от бабушкиных грядок бросает в дрожь, шумные петухи под окнами невероятно раздражают вместе с соседями, которые знают о тебе всё ещё до знакомства. Не обходится без местной шпаны по имени Минхо, который сначала задирает его, а потом вынужден ходить к Чану на занятия, чтобы поступить в институт. ㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤㅤОни сталк…

custom 598753899882899576035custom 538639061129944414311

26 Aug 2026, 21:24 UTC≈1,570 views175 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🐱

custom 5386390611299444143130custom 598753899882899576045

26 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC≈1,620 views97 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://t.me/+I--beWP3od04N2Qy летсгоу в мой ноаи блог; стань олдом только сегодня

custom 598753899882899576072custom 538639061129944414325

25 Aug 2026, 22:36 UTC963 views205 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

вы как? извиняюсь , что нету глав. я в ноль ресурсах строчить их

custom 5987538998828995760172custom 538639061129944414333

25 Aug 2026, 21:37 UTC923 views27 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

🔥 #Au — Ты здесь, чтобы я чувствовал себя в безопасности. А не чтобы ты мне указывал, лез в мою жизнь и уж точно не чтобы мы стали друзьями. Уяснил? — Я телохранитель, а не твоя нянька. Ли Феликс — восходящая звезда модной индустрии, чье имя уже на слуху, давно привыкший к чужому вниманию. Но когда сталкер, месяц державший его в страхе, проникает в квартиру, терпению приходит конец. Выход один — нанять телохранител…

custom 598753899882899576020custom 53863906112994441437

24 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC≈1,030 views180 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

вы как?

custom 5386390611299444143145custom 598753899882899576035

24 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC≈1,190 views36 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @sososokeeedPhoto

#au #minsung #фсбшник #короткаяработа #стеб #mrpoliceman #анонс "дяденька полицейский." Минхо — взрослый мужчина-фсбшник, который за всю свою жизнь повидал многое. его очень сложно было удивить, однако сперма на камере разбудила в нем неописуемые чувства, а Джисон — взрослый парень, любящий расслабиться после тяжелого дня перед большим экраном своего ноутбука. метки: элементы стеба, короткая работа РАБОТА ЗАВЕРШЕ…

custom 598753899882899576027custom 53863906112994441439

24 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC≈1,130 views57 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @kketsuunePhoto

⭐pt.59 #too_close

custom 538639061129944414341custom 598753899882899576016

23 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC≈1,120 views164 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

вы как?

custom 5386390611299444143124custom 598753899882899576040

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @noteswinterr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“лимб ау 🍊” (@noteswinterr), 8,160 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/noteswinterr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.