⚡ Какие навыки нужны аналитику данных, чтобы найти работу в 2027 году? Большинство новичков совершают одну и ту же ошибку: учат всё подряд. SQL, Python, Power BI, статистика… Но работодатели оценивают кандидатов не только по базовым навыкам, но и по другим критериям. Из-за этого многие месяцами рассылают резюме и получают только отказы или полное игнорирование. Андрон Алексанян - аналитик с опытом 9 лет и СEO Симул…

Channel
Заметки Аналитика | IT
@notes_analyst
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,888subscribers
-286 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001344823821 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @notes_analyst |
| Description | О жизненном цикле разработки ПО глазами бизнес-/системного аналитика. На канале вы найдете: - теоретический материал; - интересные статьи; - профессиональную литературу; - полезные шпаргалки; - вопросы с собеседований; - опросы. Для связи: @Ev_S_Lit |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/notes_analyst |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 00:06 | 7,888 | -12 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 23:08 | 7,900 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 23:36 | 7,905 | -5 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 18:31 | 7,910 | -7 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 15:54 | 7,917 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 7,922 | -6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 04:48 | 7,928 | -11 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 04:07 | 7,939 | -13 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 18:48 | 7,952 | -10 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 17:10 | 7,962 | -3 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 19:56 | 7,965 | -60 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 8,025 | -9 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:35 | 8,034 | -10 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 8,044 | -12 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:19 | 8,056 | -63 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:41 | 8,119 | -8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:44 | 8,127 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 8,130 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 8,139 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 8,143 | first reading |
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.8%
- avg views ÷ 7,888 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 932
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 41 (23 June 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 6,521 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 03:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈154
- Videos
- ≈2
- Links
- ≈1,140
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
19 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 47.4% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 31.6% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 14.6%
- 6 of 41 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 6
- posts carrying an erid · 6 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 974
- over 6 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 1,070
- over 35 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqwqnKxV | 1 | 7 July 2026 | 7 July 2026 |
| 2VtzqxmEGRr | 1 | 30 September 2026 | 30 September 2026 |
| 2W5zFHW9eyF | 1 | 7 August 2026 | 7 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFHabHFw | 1 | 4 August 2026 | 4 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFJKUY41 | 1 | 28 July 2026 | 28 July 2026 |
| 2W5zFJWycbs | 1 | 31 July 2026 | 31 July 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 8 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (42.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Первые 30 минут руководителя проекта, или как обнаружить проблемы до того, как они сорвут сроки "Утренние часы можно использовать для дел, которым постоянно мешает повседневная суета. Об этом пишет американская писательница Лаура Вандеркам в книге «Что самые успешные люди делают до завтрака». Попробуем перенести этот принцип на руководителя проекта и понять, как раньше остальных заметить отклонения в проектах, оцени…
Хочешь, чтобы эта осень стала началом нового карьерного этапа? Присоединяйся к онлайн кейс-чемпионату Changellenge >> Cup Moscow 2026 — это возможность решить реальные бизнес-кейсы от лидеров рынка, получить обратную связь от экспертов и опыт, который оценят работодатели. Почему стоит участвовать? — Актуальные задачи от компаний-партнеров: ВТБ, Альфа-Банка, Т-Банка, Х5, ОТП Банка, Магнита, Б1 и Авито. — Шанс получ…
Fable vs DeepSeek Uncensored: как я пентестил банк и потом занялся травлей самого себя "Как разрабатывать продукты, когда их могут круглосуточно атаковать самые лучшие пентестеры за всю историю?" Читать статью
Нейросеть пишет спецификацию интеграции и молча решает за аналитика Автор: Сергей Прощаев, Tech Lead и руководитель направления Java | Kotlin разработки в FinTech & E‑commerce и преподаватель на курсах разработки и архитектуры в Отус: "В этой статье расскажу про эксперимент, который я провёл с двумя нейросетями: дал им расплывчатое ТЗ на интеграцию интернет‑магазина со складом и оценивал не столько качество текста…
Как я с командой строил внутреннюю платформу конкурентной аналитики "На связи Владимир Михайлов, Marketing Analyst в Garage Eight. Сегодня хочу поговорить с вами о сервисах конкурентной аналитики. Почти каждая маркетинговая команда пользуется Sensor Tower, AppMagic, Similarweb и не только. Я не исключение. На одном из проектов я как раз работал с таким сервисом и спустя несколько месяцев понял простую вещь: использо…
Стать аналитиком данных всего за 10 недель — это реально! Если вы давно смотрите в сторону аналитики или хотите войти в профессию системно, а не одной ногой — сейчас самый подходящий момент. Симулейтив — школа аналитики, где обучают через практику и реальные кейсы, запускает абсолютно новый курс-буткемп - Профессия «Аналитик данных». Курс разделен на 2 этапа, за первые 10 недель вы обучаетесь аналитике и доходите …
Сравниваем Microsoft Project с российским аналогом Directum Projects: плюсы и минусы систем "Microsoft Project долгое время являлся эталонной системой управления проектами. В 2022 году российские компании начали процесс импортозамещения, но отказаться от зарубежного ИТ-решения полностью так и не получилось: около 40% отечественных организаций продолжают использовать этот инструмент. При этом зарубежный разработчик п…
Работа с клиентскими обращениями на базе BPMSoft и новые шаги в эксплуатации платформы От Автора: "Кажется, что не так давно мы впервые рассказывали о нашей работе с платформой BPMSoft в департаменте корпоративных систем ЛАНИТ, где я выполняю задачи аналитика. Но год прошел, календарь перевернут и пришло время добавить новые главы к описанию нашего взаимодействия с этой low-code системой. В этой статье мне хотелось …
Дерево, Лес или DAG? Как мы строили модель данных для цифрового офиса сотрудника "Предметное поле банковского приложения для сотрудников: как его визуализировать — как лес, дерево или граф? Я Валерий Разномазов, тимлид команды системных аналитиков проекта «Цифровой офис сотрудника», в рамках которого мы создаем приложение для сотрудников Россельхозбанка. В этой статье я рассказываю, как мы строили модель данных для …
Вклад системного аналитика оценивают не по качеству постановки задач разработчикам. А как тогда? Автор - Диана Анфёрова, лид аналитиков и системный аналитик в Контур.Толке: "На рынке есть мнение, что системному аналитику приносят готовую задачу, а его роль — перевести её на язык разработки и передать команде. Если смотреть на работу аналитика так, то и на ревью оценивать его логично по постановке функциональности —…
❤1
Что, если заменить аналитиков нейросетью? Да ничего хорошего: результаты анализа получаются слишком общими, и половину работы потом всё равно приходится переделывать руками. Хард-скилы дешевеют — SQL-запрос или кусок кода теперь может сгенерировать почти кто угодно. А вот доменная экспертиза и умение работать с агентом становятся ценнее: правильно задать вопрос, собрать контекст, проверить, что результат не искажён…
🔥2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @notes_analyst. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @notes_analyst as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 26 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 3 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 20 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@getanalysts · 22,714
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 September 2026
@system_analyse · 31,145
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026
@sys_sa · 19,116
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 3 October 2026
@ba_sa_analytics · 52,458
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
@analytics_secrets · 46,782
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
@analyst_club · 33,307
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Заметки Аналитика | IT” (@notes_analyst), 7,888 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/notes_analyst.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.