Channel
@notauthors
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
28subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003013148281 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @notauthors |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/notauthors |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 28 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 29 | no change |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 29 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 23 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
19 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 42.1% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 31.6% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 21.1% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 November 2025 to 16 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🟦 Три реальности ВКонтакте (честно, коротко и без магии) В прошлом году мы разбирали реальные лекции разработчиков ВК — те, где объясняется механика ленты, рекомендаций и историй на уровне сигналов и моделей. Не мифы, не гадания и не «СММ-ритуалы», а то, как система работает в реальности. И вот что стало ясно. 🟦 Реальность №1: как видит мир алгоритм Алгоритм опирается на сигналы: – удержание, – время просмотра, …
👍1🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
В этом году мы системно разбирались, как ВКонтакте работает на самом деле – не по слухам и кейсам «у кого-то зашло», а по тому, что сама платформа публично рассказывает о своих алгоритмах. Мы разобрали доклады, презентации и статьи VK Team, сопоставили их с наблюдаемой реальностью и собрали это в одном месте: https://vk.ru/wall-229962982_4919
👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
ВК вышел с пресс-релизом: «ВКонтакте — лидер в России по числу активных авторов и публикаций». Формально — правда. По данным Brand Analytics, ВК действительно занимает первое место среди соцсетей и по количеству авторов, и по объему публикуемого контента. Цифры большие, выглядят уверенно и отлично ложатся в PR-повестку. Но: https://vk.ru/wall-229962982_4878
Photo, posted without a caption
Про «рост года» и реальный рост авторов ВК показал итоги года и рассказал про «рост авторов». Если посмотреть на примеры, видно: выросли в основном те, кто уже был крупным, просто раньше был не в ВК или не монетизировался здесь. Это не рост, выращенный внутри платформы. Это приход готовых проектов в еще один канал. И на этом фоне нам правда интересно посмотреть на реальность. Если в этом году вы: – регулярно публ…
Photo, posted without a caption
Последние месяцы ВК усиленно кормит авторов "сладким хлебушком": "клипы — главный инструмент роста", "любой автор может выстрелить", "берите пример с успешных кейсов". И каждый раз в презентациях всплывает одна и та же витрина — Никитина ферма, которую подают как доказательство того, что "миллион подписчиков можно набрать за два года только клипами". Но давайте честно: https://vk.ru/wall-229962982_4740
Пока TikTok запускает ленту «неподалёку», чтобы людям было проще находить полезный локальный контент, — ВК снова показывает, как он на самом деле думает: https://vk.ru/wall-229962982_4705
Как-то наткнулись на исследование Livedune от весны. Ребята честно собрали статистику по форматам постов — и на графиках получилось, что трансляции и видео дают охваты в разы выше, чем тексты или опросы. Смотрится убедительно. Ссылку на исследование оставим в комментарии: https://vk.ru/wall-229962982_4674
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @notauthors. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вонтакли не с какторами” (@notauthors), 28 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/notauthors.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.