https://x.com/AlgotradingC/status/1998435713142977016

Channel
NotPaperTrading
@not_paper_trading
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
629subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002240525259 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @not_paper_trading |
| Description | Crypto Trading. No payments. Only analysis and trading. 🇺🇦https://x.com/not_paper_trade DM: [email protected] |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/not_paper_trading |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:22 | 629 | no change |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:47 | 629 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 31 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 528
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 29
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
85 reactions across 17 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 85 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2025 to 3 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
$BTC The order for my first target has been filled. Now I’m setting a hard stop-loss for my position at the breakeven level.
👍9
Hello everyone, I finally have the opportunity to break my prolonged pause. I mentioned before that with the changing market situation I’m shifting into position trading mode. Today I hit the planned trigger for my $ARB position. I’m opening a long position sized at 30% of the range, with initial targets of $0.66 and $0.82. My next updates will cover my $BTC and $ETH positions.
👍11
$ARB This setup fully aligns with my definition of buying at a lower price. A 1D candle closing above $0.43 will be my trigger to open a position with 30% of my deposit. The scenario becomes invalid if the price moves below the previous lows—specifically, if a daily candle closes below the $0.35 zone. I plan to take 50% profit at $0.66 (where the last impulse began), and close the position entirely at the key S/R l…
👍4
$BTC Following my plan, I’m increasing my position size by another 30%.
👍2
Bitcoin one of the thoughts
👍2
$BTC Recovery from the support level: if this candle closes above $88,000, I’ll add 30% to my position.
👍1
$ETH After yesterday’s news-induced pullback, I’m opening my long position here with 20% of my deposit. As before, a 3D candle closing below $1,700 will invalidate my scenario. I plan to take 50% profit at $3,400, where the downward impulse started, and fully exit at $4,000 at the resistance level.
👍2
$BTC Taking into account the latest news, in the event of continued price pumping, I’m opening a position here with a size of 50% of my deposit. I plan to add more if we see a drop toward the support level and a positive reaction. I will close my position if a 3D candle closes below the 88,000 USD support level. I plan to take partial profit (50%) at the previous ATH of 110,000 USD and fully close my position in an…
👍4
Again, an unexpected move has occurred, nullifying all my plans. I’m now awaiting the next development.
👍3
$BTC plan B. In case we don’t see a drop to the previously identified levels, here’s my next plan: Based on the idea that this was a correction/market error/liquidation of weak hands and that we will continue to rise from here in a V-shaped recovery, if we hold these price levels without a significant dip, I’ll open a long position of 50% of my deposit once the price closes a 3D candle above $85,000. I’ll consider …
👍5
$ETH Observing this cluster of downward-facing candles, unfortunately, I don’t anticipate any scenario other than another downward impulse. Therefore, I’m not expecting a reversal from this point and am placing a buy limit order at $2,000 with a position size of 30% of my deposit. If we fail to hold the support zone, it will indicate that I was mistaken, so a 3D candle closing below $1,700 would invalidate my scena…
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @not_paper_trading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@pigmotg · 46,943
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 8 September 2026
@jacktokencom · 430,704
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NotPaperTrading” (@not_paper_trading), 629 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/not_paper_trading.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.