Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

not Shadeov 🤭

@notShadeov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002233471213
TypeChannel
Username@notShadeov
DescriptionFull-Cycle разработчик. Превращаю кофе и ТЗ на салфетке в готовый продукт. shadeov.ru
Created16 August 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/notShadeov

Growth

97 August 2026 — 9 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8–10 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:189no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:399first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 16 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
10
Videos
3
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 21s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍531.3%
425.0%
💊318.8%
😁318.8%
🤝16.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2024 to 19 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.26%
1 of 19 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
135
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
162
over 17 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2024 to 19 December 2025. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

16 Oct 2025, 06:53 UTC197 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📝 Windows When? Windows Now! — Zed наконец-то вышел на Windows Свершилось! После долгих месяцев ожидания Zed официально доступен на Windows в стабильной версии. Для тех, кто следит за развитием редакторов кода, это событие колоссальное — наконец появилась реальная альтернатива монополии VS Code и ему подобных форков. ⁉️ Важно понимать Zed — это не очередной Electron-говнокод. Это нативное приложение, использующее

3

13 Oct 2025, 14:18 UTC162 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

🎨 Tailwind CSS — классов больше, чем смысла Посмотрите на это видео. Вот так выглядит "современная" вёрстка — километры классов в каждом элементе. Да, Tailwind удобен. Да, он ускоряет разработку. Но! Знаете, что ещё удобнее? Вообще ничего не писать. Tailwind идеален для MVP и внутренних продуктов, где скорость важнее качества. Быстро накидал, быстро запустил — отлично! Но! Дальше начинаются проблемы... Минусы Tail

12 Apr 2025, 07:54 UTC279 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

👩‍💻 Microsoft открыто душит форки VS Code За ширмой "открытости" Microsoft планомерно уничтожает экосистему форков VS Code, блокируя доступ к ключевым языковым расширениям. Происходящее — не что иное как циничный пример корпоративного лицемерия. ❓ Что происходит Microsoft блокирует свои официальные расширения для C/C++, C# и Python в форках VS Code. При попытке установки система прямо заявляет: "Используйте VS Cod

1

7 Apr 2025, 03:54 UTC214 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤔 Интересный случай от AEZA Меня забанили в чате AEZA. За что? За посты в моем личном телеграм канале про их обыски. Особенно учитывая то, что мои последние сообщения в их чате были сделаны месяцы назад. Нет, я бы понял, если бы у меня был какой-то популярный телеграм канал, но у меня 7!!! подписчиков 😏 То есть, пока у компании обыски, задержания руководства и уголовное дело об ОПС — они тратят ресурсы на монитори

👍1

4 Apr 2025, 17:07 UTC209 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📣 Официальное заявление AEZA (неофициальное) Уважаемые пользователи! Да, небольшой пиздец действительно произошел: СК, 30 оперов, уголовное дело об ОПС, изъятие серверов, аресты руководства... Но всё АБСОЛЮТНО хорошо! Наша инфраструктура полностью стабильна* (*мы не можем вносить никаких изменений, так как все админы на допросах) Все данные клиентов в безопасности** (**кроме тех, что уже изъяты следователями) Нет

💊3😁2

4 Apr 2025, 16:40 UTC168 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🥰 В России накрыли "цифровой Шёлковый путь"? Пока все следят за тарифным безумием Трампа, в России произошло событие не менее катастрофическое для миллионов граждан — накрыли "АЕЗА Групп". И это пострашнее любых пошлин. 🏴‍☠️ Что такое АЕЗА и почему это важно? АЕЗА — не просто очередной хостер. Это фундамент российского серого интернета последних лет. На их серверах работало: - Большинство пиратских кинотеатров с г

4 Apr 2025, 15:37 UTC112 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

😈 Продолжение тарифного шапито 😕 Трамп шокирован, что Китай ответил пошлинами. Кто бы мог подумать, что когда бьешь — могут дать сдачи? 💀 JPMorgan: "Шансы на глобальную рецессию — 60%". Экономисты, которые обычно говорят "рынок стабилен" даже когда всё горит, теперь в панике. 🍁 Канада решила стать новым мировым лидером. Премьер Канады Карни заявил, что его страна готова заменить США в роли мирового лидера. Да-да,

4 Apr 2025, 15:00 UTC112 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Торговая война: День второй. Технологический мир в огне Помните мой вчерашний крик души про тарифы Трампа? Так вот, пиздец оказался глубже, чем казалось. За последние сутки: - Bitcoin рухнул до $81,000 - Apple потеряла 300 ярдов капитализации — 8% за один день! - Мировые рынки просели на $3 трлн - Китай ответил своими 34% на всё американское 🖕 Новая реальность наступила iPhone 16 Pro может стоить по 200 тысяч р

3 Apr 2025, 19:09 UTC92 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📉 Технологии становятся заложниками тарифных войн Акции Apple рухнули более, чем на 20 пунктов, после открытия торгов. Причина? Новые тарифы Трампа: 25% на ноутбуки, 20% на продукцию из ЕС, а для некоторых стран и вовсе космические цифры — Вьетнам (46%), Тайвань (32%), Япония (24%). ⁉️ Что это значит для нас, разработчиков? - Подорожание железа на 20-25% - Рост стоимости облачных сервисов (угадайте, где стоят их с

3 Feb 2025, 10:21 UTC148 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Какой-то бенчмарк из GitHub авторов

👍1

3 Feb 2025, 10:04 UTC236 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🐳 Гибридный ИИ DeepClaude — связка DeepSeek и Claude выжала 200% из нейросетей Небольшая команда разработчиков создала то, о чём рынок говорил шепотом: DeepClaude — гибридная платформа, объединяющая аналитику DeepSeek R1 и креатив Claude 3.5. Технология, которая ставит под вопрос лидерство OpenAI в генеративном AI. 📌 Ключевые приемущества - DeepSeek R1 — алгоритм с CoT-логикой (Chain of Thought), который анализируе

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @notShadeov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“not Shadeov 🤭” (@notShadeov), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/notShadeov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.