Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Raicher’s Gulch

Channel

Raicher’s Gulch

@nostreidamos

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,288subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001486908662
TypeChannel
Username@nostreidamos
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nostreidamos

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,2881,3091,298.57 August 2026 — 1,309 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,309 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,307 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,306 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,298 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,297 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,295 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,293 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,292 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,289 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,288 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 39 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,285–1,312 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 11:551,288-1
11 Sept 2026, 23:201,289-3
7 Sept 2026, 08:391,292-1
3 Sept 2026, 00:031,293-2
30 Aug 2026, 14:121,295-2
25 Aug 2026, 03:221,297-1
22 Aug 2026, 06:051,298-8
18 Aug 2026, 19:581,306-1
11 Aug 2026, 23:021,307-2
8 Aug 2026, 18:041,309no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:461,309first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

140 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5438.6%
😢2316.4%
🫡1712.1%
🔥139.29%
👏96.43%
😭75.00%
😁64.29%
53.57%
42.86%
🥰21.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2025 to 15 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Dec 2025, 02:08 UTC980 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/raicher/status/2000363720837665007?s=46

😢23🫡17😭75👏5

12 Dec 2025, 17:13 UTC≈1,040 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

É proibido ser feliz 🙂😅Mais uma vez rasgando as medias pra baixoMAS- Acima da linha Roxa (igual o último trap)- Acima do Suporte Inferior do RSI Vamos seguindo assim, liquidando os incautos até uma oportunidade de visitar a Resistência Superior do RSIGM 🥹#log https://t.co/KpdIC48fGb — Raicher (@allanraicher) Dec 12, 2025 December 12, 2025 at 09:12AM via Twitter https://twitter.com/allanraicher

😁6

12 Dec 2025, 00:22 UTC904 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#Curtissimo 343 minutos:- Confirmamos rompimento da Média do RSI! Alvo na Resistência Superior.- Alvo na MA2401 e linha Amarela 686 minutos:- EMA1372 é a resistência a ser vencida no curtíssimo nesse intervalo - Fechamos sobre a EMA77, o que é promissor- CONFIRMAMOS https://t.co/6KMCcihszC — Raicher (@allanraicher) Dec 12, 2025 December 11, 2025 at 04:18PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/allanraicher

👍4

12 Dec 2025, 00:22 UTC751 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Log 362 (4, 3, 2, 1, 0) Belíssimo Bear Trap abaixo da MA21! Fechamos com um belo wick no #Diario - AINDA abaixo do RSI 50. Ele tem sido nossa baliza desse intervalo ultimamente porque tem sido a resistência mestra aqui.- Caso rompa (tá na hora), olho na MA49 e depois na https://t.co/mWAgi8XgKA https://t.co/WkaRs9V4tR — Raicher (@allanraicher) Dec 12, 2025 December 11, 2025 at 04:18PM via X https://ift.tt/bmeXKqc

👍3

11 Dec 2025, 23:02 UTC651 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

QED, era bear trapQED, era fundo local na linha RoxaQED, o StochRSI tocou o fundoAgora estamos acima de todas as medias do #Curtissimo Também estamos ACIMA do Suporte Inferior do RSI e da Média do RSI!Alvos, portanto, voltam para a linha Amarela e para a Resistência https://t.co/0WwzOHINzJ — Raicher (@allanraicher) Dec 11, 2025 December 11, 2025 at 02:58PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/allanraicher

👍5

11 Dec 2025, 17:18 UTC570 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#Log Nada como dormir bem, de fora dos trades, aguardando ganhar de volta o suporte da MA77, QED 🙂Paramos ACIMA da linha Roxa, mas ABAIXO da Resistência Inferior do RSI. Acontece que estamos na região dos traps, ou seja, podemos estar no fundo dessa correção local. https://t.co/ktOrxqPVk4 — Raicher (@allanraicher) Dec 11, 2025 December 11, 2025 at 09:13AM via Twitter https://twitter.com/allanraicher

👏4🔥2

11 Dec 2025, 05:53 UTC460 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Não ganhamos a MA/EMA7 então não era bear trapMASFechamos ACIMA do Suporte Inferior do RSI praticamente apoiados no suporteAlém disso temos uma trend interessante de higher lows se mostrandoAguardando ganhar a MA77 de voltaGN 🌫️#log https://t.co/GUHjYYH9lh — Raicher (@allanraicher) Dec 11, 2025 December 10, 2025 at 09:51PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/allanraicher

👍4

11 Dec 2025, 00:17 UTC374 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#Curtissimo 343 minutos:- De novo abaixo da EMA/MA7- De novo abaixo da Média do RSI- StochRSI ainda inconclusivo Aguardando ganhar MA/EMA7 para confirmar o bear trap686 minutos:- Presos abaixo da EMA77 e suportados pela EMA7- Andando acima da média o tempo todo https://t.co/uvX8pbaBwh — Raicher (@allanraicher) Dec 11, 2025 December 10, 2025 at 04:16PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/allanraicher

👍4

10 Dec 2025, 22:57 UTC327 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Que vela 🕯️😅Fechou no espaço entre MA/EMA7 mas foi o suficiente para ganharmos a Média do RSI novamente por enquanto confirmando a tese do bear trap.StochRSI na iminência de cruzar, pode ser um sinal promissor.Até o fechamento do #diario daqui 1h! 👋🏻 https://t.co/Ph1UnRncqI — Raicher (@allanraicher) Dec 10, 2025 December 10, 2025 at 02:57PM via X https://ift.tt/x1qD9KY

🔥3

10 Dec 2025, 17:18 UTC299 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ainda não conseguimos ir lá. Mas ainda é meu alvo.RSI apontando perda na média, mas como nas situações anteriores, pode ser bear trap, pois ainda não testamos a Resistência Superior.Nas situações anteriores também dipou na MA/EMA7.GM 🫡#log https://t.co/rN2YnC2OaY — Raicher (@allanraicher) Dec 10, 2025 December 10, 2025 at 09:14AM via Twitter https://twitter.com/allanraicher

👍4

10 Dec 2025, 05:48 UTC289 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

MA7 segurando suporte perfeito Média do RSI segurando suporte RSI conseguiu ainda mais fôlego Alvo na linha Amarela e na Resistência Superior do RSIGN 🗽#log https://t.co/XRNpntYr5i — Raicher (@allanraicher) Dec 10, 2025 December 09, 2025 at 09:47PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/allanraicher

👍4

10 Dec 2025, 00:17 UTC284 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#Curtissimo 343 minutos:- Lindo fechamento! Ainda por cima conseguimos arrefecer o RSI sem perder a média!- Alvo continua na linha Amarela686 minutos:- Fechamos ACIMA da EMA77 finalmente! Confirma daqui 11h!- RSI tem bastante espaço até a Resistência Superior- https://t.co/aI0IlmB92M — Raicher (@allanraicher) Dec 10, 2025 December 09, 2025 at 04:15PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/allanraicher

🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nostreidamos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CRIPTOINVESTIDORES 💸
@criptoinvestidores · 33,096
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 4 September 2026
Vitrine de Criptomoedas
@VitrineDeCripto · 65,439
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Raicher’s Gulch” (@nostreidamos), 1,288 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nostreidamos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.