Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Nosemate

Channel

Nosemate

@nosemate

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

344subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001829528861
TypeChannel
Username@nosemate
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nosemate

Growth

3443463457 August 2026 — 346 subscribers8 August 2026 — 346 subscribers14 August 2026 — 345 subscribers22 August 2026 — 344 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 344–346 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 00:24344-1
14 Aug 2026, 15:05345-1
8 Aug 2026, 06:50346no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:36346first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.6%
avg views ÷ 344 subscribers
Avg views / post
98.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held20 (25 February 20261 August 2026)
Views total197
Reactions total17
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

197 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9045.7%
3015.2%
custom 5390972117338564131189.14%
👍157.61%
👏147.11%
💯136.60%
😁94.57%
😈52.54%
custom 539091087969485781710.508%
custom 539094247776925446510.508%
🤯10.508%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 197reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nosemate. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 February 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC70 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Что скажу, пока не забрал отливанты ароматов по заявкам из кружка? Не был в курсе о реформулировке. Как внешней, так и содержательной. Содержание – стало более цветочным и менее "конюшенным", но совсем слегка. Что уж может опечалить, хоть и не удивить – технические характеристики схуднули, словно затерялись в необитаемой зоне эдак на недельку. Насчет визуального – какой флакон вам больше по душе? Помимо очевидного

🔥3💯2👏1

24 Jul 2026, 17:37 UTC127 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥8👏2custom 53909721173385641311

23 Jul 2026, 10:30 UTC140 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Проверил информацию и очень удивился, что еще ничего не писал вам про Purpose Amouage. Особенно с учетом того, что я изначально выбирал его для пробы сам, по собственной инициативе. Совсем не случайный герой для локального обзора, если в двух словах. Очень вдумчивый, солидный, не кричащий, но в то же время не излишне классический и топорный. Он и «супной» (порой ветивер в определенных комбинациях выдает мне настро

🔥6👏5custom 53909721173385641311

22 Jul 2026, 17:20 UTC124 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Рубрика «оказалось у меня случайно» или пару впечатлений об аромате с заявленной в названии кожей авторства Сесиль Зарокян – Cuir Altesse David Jourquin. Устал повторять одно и то же, но этот экземпляр – еще один из тех, в которых кожа далеко не на первых ролях. Может, где-то на фоне или среди всех участников композиции ее найти и можно, но если бы эти духи создавал я – "cuir" в название я бы точно не выносил. Прот

🔥7👍31

18 Jul 2026, 14:08 UTC130 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Какая нынче погода там, где вы живете или пребываете и к каким духам чаще всего тянется рука?

🔥6custom 53909721173385641313👍1custom 53909108796948578171custom 53909424777692544651

17 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC143 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Разгоняюсь с нуля (после простоя, если угодно) я, конечно, разительно медленней большинства мотоциклов. Но не могу не выразить искреннюю благодарность всем соучаствующим! Личная ирония судьбы: открещивался от цитрусов, считая их слишком избитым мотивом на рынке парфюмерии. Про себя и не только ругался на то, что этот самый рынок предлагает огромное множество вариаций на тему с минимальными отличиями и не совсем инте

🔥8👍3custom 53909721173385641311

1 Jul 2026, 19:51 UTC182 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Давно не виделись. Причиной тому – точность моего прогноза еще в сентябре прошлого года, давно тянущийся и близкий к реализации проект, который я старательно вынашиваю, но и многое другое. По неведомой причине был уверен, что делился своими впечатлениями про Angel Schlesser Femme. Оказалось – ошибался! Что ж – лучше поздно, чем никогда. Выбор обусловлен не контекстом – хоть сам аромат прекрасно освежил бы в солнцеп

🔥8👍21👏1

1 May 2026, 15:48 UTC350 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В последнее время везет на находки с правильным, лаконичным, красивым минимализмом. Вот и Tobacco Memories Chambre52 попал в этот тренд. Начало моего знакомства с табачным направлением у меня было едва ли не грандиозное – с единовременной порции в аж 17 ароматов. Много пересекающихся паттернов в композициях я тогда зафиксировал и запомнил. Очевидно: разнообразные версии комбинаций вишневости с пряностью в табачных

👍4🔥43

15 Apr 2026, 15:29 UTC319 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как много было услышано и прочитано мной про этот аромат. Действительно, большой частью в разной степени парфувлеченного сообщества был нарисован собирательный портрет Kinski как провокационного и неоднозначного. Как многие из вас знают, я такое как раз люблю. Поэтому попробовать очередную легендарную снятость мне хотелось очень и очень давно. Дополнительным бонусом в копилку аккумулирующегося интереса стало любопы

🔥74custom 53909721173385641311

10 Apr 2026, 13:58 UTC243 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Что-то я не смертельно, но иногда угасаю огнем души, когда описываю здесь аромат, не подаривший яркое впечатление для меня. Хотя искренне стараюсь транслировать вам все впечатления о том, что попадает в мой нос. Поэтому следующим обзором пускай будет долгожданный Kinski!

5👏2💯1🔥1

9 Apr 2026, 19:16 UTC239 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Что-то в последнее время потянуло на сочные, игривые, позитивные фруктово-цветочные духи. Всплеск яркости, иногда даже «перекрученной». Полагаю, дело в весне и погоде (но речь уж точно не о сегодняшней московской; скорей о средневзвешенной за последние пару недель). Следуя этим желаниям и раскошелился на остаток «Гарсона». В цель попал, эмоции приносит, очень нравится. К покупке положили пробников, среди которых бы

🔥72custom 53909721173385641311

7 Apr 2026, 16:28 UTC197 views10 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

Эта история – точно из моей популярной на этом канале рубрики, которую я шуточно назвал бы «Тысяча и Один Уд». В Shams Oud вынесенный на фасад герой – скорей ближе к той интерпретации, что многие из нас слышали в неимоверно популярном Oud Wood. Вполне себе чистый и аккуратный, мягкий и суховатый, европеизированный, сглаженный донельзя. Никаких тут вам конюшен, медицинщины или нечистот. Что до композиции в ее полноц

🔥63custom 53909721173385641311

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nosemate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Mar 2026, 11:01 UTCAnonymous Poll38 voters

А вы что выберете?

  1. Посидим в телеграме с мерами обхода блокировок71%
  2. Перейдем в Макс (пришлось превентивно купить второй телефон для этого)11%
  3. ВК (паблик и/или канал)11%
  4. Другое8%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nosemate” (@nosemate), 344 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nosemate.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.