Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NORTHERN CRANE

Channel

NORTHERN CRANE

@northerncrane

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

228subscribers

+127 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003878270831
TypeChannel
Username@northerncrane
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded25 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/northerncrane

Growth

101228164.525 August 2026 — 101 subscribers25 August 2026 — 101 subscribers26 August 2026 — 124 subscribers2 September 2026 — 228 subscribers25 August 20262 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +127. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 82–247 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 18:05228+104
26 Aug 2026, 01:24124+23
25 Aug 2026, 14:30101no change
25 Aug 2026, 14:16101first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.48%
avg views ÷ 228 subscribers
Avg views / post
19.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held5 (6 July 202625 August 2026)
Views total58
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

62 reactions across 2 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52737569622726087871422.6%
custom 52764536305038455441016.1%
custom 5368689388920269099914.5%
custom 5276321019093613001711.3%
custom 539331326965189721469.68%
custom 539325664480306728258.06%
custom 546332553154399138746.45%
custom 546538215515884316746.45%
custom 527643419148186340934.84%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC13 viewsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @darkazzzPhoto

💙 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 💙 👄 @darkazzz и @northerncrane подписывают соглашение. Но главное здесь не подписи. Главное — доверие, которое мы несём друг другу, и готовность идти вместе. это не финиш, это старт. Новая глава объявлена открытой. 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙

25 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC23 viewsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Высоты встречают безжалостным морозным ветром, хрустом снега и мерцанием россыпи звёзд. Свобода сопровождается волнением, горизонт ведёт в неизвестность, зов сердца резонирует с холодом, пробирающим до костей. Он никогда не подводит, отзываясь пульсацией по всему телу, направляя взгляд на единственный проблеск в темноте вершин, когда кажется, что тело навсегда останется под слоями ледяного покрывала. Костёр надежды п

25 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC22 viewsread 25 August 2026
Forwarded from @REDLINEETPhoto

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🔤ёв турбины глушит шум ночного города. На тахометре — красная зона, а в венах — чистый адреналин. 🔤а этой скорости нет места одиночкам — выживают только те, кто чувствует трассу одинаково. 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🔤оперники остались сзади, растворившись в дыму жжёной резины. Мы больше не делим этот асфальт. 🤩🤩🤩 🔤 этой минуты @REDLINEET и @northerncrane — один сплошной поток безумной скорости. 🔤ы вступаем

6 Jul 2026, 11:31 UTC809 views27 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍NAVIGATION🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍ADMINISTRATION🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍RULES🤍 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍TIKTOK🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍ARCHIVE🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍UNIONS🤍

custom 52737569622726087877custom 52763210190936130014custom 52764536305038455444custom 53686893889202690993custom 53932566448030672822custom 53933132696518972142custom 54633255315439913872custom 54653821551588431672

6 Jul 2026, 11:31 UTC867 views35 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

❌❌❌❌ᛟ 𝑺𝑬𝑻 𝑰𝑵 𝑪𝑯𝑨𝑻 ᛟ 🤩 only вирт скз 15+ 🤩 подписка на канал 🤩 прочитать правила, поставить инициалы 🤩 скинуть одному из админов подтверждение возраста(читайте правила). если бан пишите в АНОН 🤩 получить ссылку у админа и вступить в чат

custom 52737569622726087877custom 52764536305038455446custom 53686893889202690996custom 53933132696518972144custom 52763210190936130013custom 53932566448030672823custom 52764341914818634092custom 54633255315439913872

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @northerncrane. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NORTHERN CRANE” (@northerncrane), 228 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/northerncrane.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.