2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 470–472 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 12:05
471
no change
16 Aug 2026, 03:15
471
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 17 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.6%
avg views ÷ 471 subscribers
Avg views / post
50.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
18 (17 April 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
100
Reactions total
6
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 50s
Average length
28s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
18 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
18
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بعد فترة انقطاعي عن النشر في الصفحة نتيجة انشغالي بعد خطبتي ومن ثم زواجي ممن ارتضيتها زوجة لي، أقول لكم أن الطريق إلى الحلال هو الوجهة التي ترضي الله وهذه الخطوة تتطلب منك سعياً صادقاً في كل خطوة واجتهاداً في عملك
وقد كان الزفاف بفضل الله إسلامياً يخلو من الموسيقى بشكل كامل دون المظاهر التي نراها اليوم التي لا ترضي الله
فنرى اليوم عادات ليس لها بالدين صلة، يقلدها الناس تقليداً أعمى فقط من أجل إرضاء غيرهم وربما ذاته…
هناك حديث آخذ بالتضخّم بالأوساط العلمية حول أثر التقنية على تراجع قدرتنا على احتمال المجهول وكيفية التعامل مع (اللايقين)، مثلًا:
• جوجل يُجيبَك عن أسئلة (لم تكن تعرف) إجاباتها
• خرائط جوجل أو Maps يجعلك تتجنّب التوهان ويُساعدك بالخروج من أماكن (لا تعرفها)
• شازام Shazam يُعرّفك على أغاني (لم تكن تعرفها)
• تشات جي بي تي، سيجيبك عمّا ينبغي عليك فعله أو قوله حين تكون تائهًا، مذعورًا أو مشوّشًا.
كل هذا كي لا تُقيم …
(1) ليست القضية أن بعض الفتيات تأخرن في الزواج، بل أن تيارًا فكريًا أعاد تشكيل الوعي حتى لم يعد الزواج عند بعضهن سكنًا، بل قيدًا، ولم تعد الأسرة استقرارًا، بل عبئًا، ولم يعد الرجل شريكًا، بل خصمًا محتمَلًا. فالمشكلة لم تعد في الوقائع، بل في التصورات التي حوّلت التجارب الفردية إلى أحكام عامة، والفشل المحدود إلى إدانة لفكرة الزواج نفسها.
(2) لقد رُفعت قيمة الاستقلال حتى تحولت عند بعض الناس إلى عقيدة استغناء. فأصبحت ال…
ورد في صحيح مسلم قول رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم: ما مِن يَومٍ أَكْثَرَ مِن أَنْ يُعْتِقَ اللَّهُ فيه عَبْدًا مِنَ النَّارِ، مِن يَومِ عَرَفَةَ، وإنَّه لَيَدْنُو، ثُمَّ يُبَاهِي بهِمُ المَلَائِكَةَ، فيَقولُ: ما أَرَادَ هَؤُلَاءِ؟
وخير الدعاء دعاء يوم عرفة ، فاللهم تقبل منا
دعوة لأخيكم المسلم في ظهر الغيب ولكم بالمثل إن شاء الله
الواقعية المطلقة في هذا الزمن هي طريق مباشر للجنون.
لو جلست تحسب الأرقام بدون إيمان بأن الله قد يغيّر كل شيء في لحظة، ستنهار بل ستصاب بالجنون والإكتئاب الحاد .
خذ أي مثال من حياتك:
الشاب الذي يبحث عن وظيفة، لو فكر بواقعية فقط، ماذا سيحسب؟
ملايين المتقدمين.
وظائف معدودة.
شهادته لا تضمن شيئا.
الواسطة أحيانا أقوى من الكفاءة.
والاقتصاد سيء جدا وما في شغل
سيقول في نفسه:
لماذا أتعب نفسي في السعي ؟ لا توجد فائدة.
وفي ال…
عِبادَ الله!
هذه الأيام مطايا، فأين العِدَّةُ قبل المنايا؟
أين الأنَفَةُ من دار الأذايا؟
أين العزائم؟ أرضيتُمْ بالدنايا؟
إن بلية الهوى لا تشبه البلايا، وإن خطيئة الإصرار لا كالخطايا، يا مستورين! ستظهر الخبايا، سريَّةُ الموت لا تشبه السرايا، قضيةُ الزمان ليست كالقضايا، راعي السلامة يقتل الرعايا، رامي المنون يُصْمِي الرمايا، مَلَكُ الموت لا يقبل الهدايا، وكأني به قد أخذكم جيلاً جيلاً ، ﴿ وَالْآخِرَةُ خَيْرٌ لِّمَنِ اتَ…
نحن مقبلون على أعظم أيام الدنيا ابتداء من هذه الليلة
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @nor3lanorr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Deutsch mit Hend 🇩🇪 @frauhendtahakanal · 130,924 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شفاء القلوب🫀” (@nor3lanorr), 471 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nor3lanorr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.