Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for n00basha

Channel

n00basha

@noobashaQ

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

85subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002382649433
TypeChannel
Username@noobashaQ
Descriptionsorry but your music taste = your fashion taste
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/noobashaQ

Growth

857 August 2026 — 85 subscribers9 August 2026 — 85 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 84–86 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 17:0185no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:3585first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 17 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
125
Videos
20
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
19s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

629 reactions across 9 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54384684942177292997511.9%
custom 51905003569744724637411.8%
custom 54631823115645367616410.2%
custom 52466998751936174046310.0%
custom 5242404044609189272538.43%
custom 5298558199383736171497.79%
custom 5343554694843230131457.15%
custom 5393344584258454340457.15%
custom 5246851229841125299304.77%
custom 5355118344531892556223.50%
custom 5463403691358842037223.50%
custom 5436085616297145109213.34%
custom 5323324561360452702182.86%
custom 5384605098905201517152.38%
custom 5402142919253583985111.75%
custom 523593168780789378860.954%
custom 524904058083032522760.954%
custom 539083736703464207640.636%
custom 524012346421965096130.477%
custom 543812158541426355820.318%
1 further kind10.159%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 629reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2025 to 17 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 9 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @noobashaQ. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 November 2025 to 17 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Dec 2025, 13:28 UTC799 views67 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 524240404460918927228custom 543608561629714510917custom 524669987519361740415custom 54384684942177292996custom 52674554249106244191

17 Dec 2025, 13:28 UTC776 views90 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 543846849421772929932custom 524685122984112529930custom 524669987519361740422custom 52490405808303252276

17 Dec 2025, 13:28 UTC780 views89 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

custom 543846849421772929937custom 524669987519361740426custom 524240404460918927223custom 54381215854142635582custom 52401234642196509611

17 Dec 2025, 13:28 UTC598 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 54360856162971451094custom 52401234642196509612custom 52424040446091892722

3 Dec 2025, 11:39 UTC685 views68 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

bad day to be a woman

custom 539334458425845434045custom 538460509890520151712custom 540214291925358398511

2 Dec 2025, 20:33 UTC599 views74 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 546318231156453676135custom 546340369135884203718custom 519050035697447246315custom 52985581993837361716

2 Dec 2025, 20:33 UTC596 views120 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

custom 529855819938373617143custom 519050035697447246331custom 546318231156453676129custom 52359316878078937886custom 53908373670346420764custom 54634036913588420374custom 53846050989052015173

2 Dec 2025, 20:33 UTC460 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 519050035697447246328

17 Nov 2025, 17:16 UTC539 views85 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 534355469484323013145custom 535511834453189255622custom 532332456136045270218

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @noobashaQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,064,056 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“n00basha” (@noobashaQ), 85 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/noobashaQ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.