Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Non JUPAS 資訊頻道

Channel

Non JUPAS 資訊頻道

@nonjupas_channel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

27,511subscribers

+817 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001440217297
TypeChannel
Username@nonjupas_channel
Description⚠️ 睇咗報名須知先發問 ⬇️ https://www.nonjupas.hk/nonjupas/preparing-to-apply 討論區:@nonjupas 重要資料: https://t.me/nonjupas_channel/773 資助大學取錄副學位院校學生資料: https://ugc-stat.nonjupas.hk/ 有查詢請入 @nonjupas 問,唔好pm admin
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nonjupas_channel

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

26,69427,51127,102.57 August 2026 — 26,694 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,694 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,695 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,715 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,749 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,803 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,825 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,831 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,847 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,883 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,905 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,907 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,910 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,921 subscribers22 August 2026 — 26,931 subscribers23 August 2026 — 26,936 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,944 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,952 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,964 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,978 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,991 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,995 subscribers30 August 2026 — 27,000 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,996 subscribers1 September 2026 — 27,011 subscribers2 September 2026 — 27,053 subscribers4 September 2026 — 27,069 subscribers6 September 2026 — 27,097 subscribers9 September 2026 — 27,194 subscribers12 September 2026 — 27,237 subscribers13 September 2026 — 27,243 subscribers15 September 2026 — 27,364 subscribers17 September 2026 — 27,511 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net +817. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,571–27,634 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 12:5827,511+147
15 Sept 2026, 13:5627,364+121
13 Sept 2026, 18:5727,243+6
12 Sept 2026, 03:5727,237+43
9 Sept 2026, 19:5627,194+97
6 Sept 2026, 15:1627,097+28
4 Sept 2026, 03:4227,069+16
2 Sept 2026, 18:3427,053+42
1 Sept 2026, 17:0427,011+15
31 Aug 2026, 16:0826,996-4
30 Aug 2026, 19:1327,000+5
29 Aug 2026, 16:3826,995+4
28 Aug 2026, 18:5326,991+13
27 Aug 2026, 21:4626,978+14
27 Aug 2026, 00:0426,964+12
26 Aug 2026, 01:0426,952+8
25 Aug 2026, 01:4226,944+8
23 Aug 2026, 16:2526,936+5
22 Aug 2026, 03:2626,931+10
20 Aug 2026, 19:1426,921first reading

Engagement

79 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.6%
avg views ÷ 27,511 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,910
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.469%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
43
of 79 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 32 of 43 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026
Posts held79 (2 August 202619 September 2026)
Views total124,933
Reactions total406
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Sept 2026, 19:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
433
Videos
2
Links
3,090

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

734 reactions across 39 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍43258.9%
30241.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 79 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 734 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC684 views1 reactionsread 19 September 2026

[HKU IM/SDS/ACD] HKU 嘅 Top up program 會被視為四年制課程,但只接受完成副學位嘅學生入讀,而實際上只需要讀兩年(與其他 Senior entry 嘅學科無異)。 若你現正就讀學士學位,或曾就讀學士學位一年或以上,你並不符合資格報讀港大銜接學位。如有查詢,請直接聯絡HKU。 Source: https://web.edu.hku.hk/programme/bsim/admissions https://admissions.hku.hk/apply/hong-kong-sub-degrees#entrance-requirements

1

19 Sept 2026, 04:43 UTC≈1,530 views1 reactionsread 19 September 2026

【科大入高年級究竟係 Year 2 定 Year 3?】 HKUST 高年級入學採用學分制度,學生讀夠120學分就可以畢業,入學前佢哋會視乎個別情況按申請人的申請轉移 21 - 60個學分。 每個課程獲批嘅學分數量不等,建議問返同科師兄可以Tran幾多。例如話 IVE SE > CS 係 48 - 60 不等, CPEG 就 40。 因為您修讀幾多個Credit係彈性嘅,所以無特別講話課程叫 Year 2 定 Year 3 。 入學後,SIS內仍然係寫同學入讀 Year 1,科大叫法係 Direct Entry,教資會叫法係「高年級入學」;但只要滿足畢業條件(其中包括最少於科大就讀兩年)就可以畢業。 詳情: https://registry.hkust.edu.hk/resource-library/graduation-requirements-ug

1

18 Sept 2026, 05:37 UTC≈2,470 views8 reactionsread 19 September 2026

📖 各學校填寫GPA時嘅滿分 IVE 4.00 CUSCS 4.00 UOWCHK 4.30 BU CIE 4.00 HKU SPACE 4.00 HKCC 4.30 (^ 適用於2020/21學年起入讀或仍在進行課程的HKCC學生) CUSCS 4.00 HKMU LiPACE 4.30 (適用於三學分學制的學生) 或 4.00 (五學分學制) EduHK HD 4.33 ℹ️ 如果填錯咗嘅由佢,學校識睇,唔需要聯絡學校修正 備註1) HKU SPACE嘅科目評級 A+ 視為 4.3 ; 但最後計算 GPA 時將於 4.0 封頂,如果超出 4.0 嘅部分將不會被顯示。有同學會自行計算超過 4.0 嘅部分;以上嘅分數並非正式分數。 備註2) (只適用於2019/20年度或以前離校/畢業的HKCC學生) HKCC 2019學年前嘅嘅 A+

8

17 Sept 2026, 15:38 UTC≈2,620 views51 reactionsread 19 September 2026

致各位想入大學嘅同學: 請從入學開始就認真對待每份Assignment及考試,尤其係Year 1 成績。一開始落後咗就好難追。

51

17 Sept 2026, 11:45 UTC≈2,630 views1 reactionsread 19 September 2026

CityUHK BA Creative Media - 讀啲咩?面試同 Portfolio 流程? 過來人經歷分享 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nl17KbnKKHk

1

16 Sept 2026, 16:47 UTC≈3,080 views2 reactionsread 19 September 2026

【我讀緊嘅科目,可以升讀邊啲大學科目?🎓】 想知自己而家讀緊嘅 Asso / HD,可以報大學邊啲科,要GPA幾多? 大家可以用下面嘅「派位紀錄」,按自己嘅: 🏫 原就讀院校 📚 就讀科目 🔎 睇返歷屆同背景同學最後收到咩科 Offer 除咗升讀科目之外,仲可以參考前人嘅 GPA、面試紀錄等,幫你揀科同部署 Non JUPAS 申請。 範例連結:https://www.nonjupas.hk/api/from/HKCC/Health%20Studies/offer/2026 資料只作參考。

2

16 Sept 2026, 15:34 UTC≈3,070 views1 reactionsread 19 September 2026

HKU SPACE Add-Drop-Swap Period將至,為方便各位不同學科的同學能夠更清晰地swap到科,亦為左其他討論group唔好被洗版,我地 @nonjupas 的太空admin希望各位同學能夠統一到以下平台進行add drop swap的動作: @hkuspaceswap

1

16 Sept 2026, 15:33 UTC≈2,600 viewsread 19 September 2026

本群就副學位畢業生報讀高年級/一年級的建議如下: https://t.me/nonjupas_channel/3885

16 Sept 2026, 08:38 UTC≈3,010 views3 reactionsread 19 September 2026

政府今日公布2026《施政報告》及首份《香港特別行政區經濟和社會發展五年規劃(2026—2030年)》,多項措施涉及專上教育發展。五年規劃提出推動「專上教育擴容提質」,加強香港院校與海內外知名大學、科研機構合作,並把修讀本地評審全日制專上課程的非本地學生人數,由2024/25學年的約7.98萬人,提升至2029/30學年的10萬人。 北部都會區將發展新田、洪水橋及打鼓嶺三個大學城。政府計劃於2026年啟動校園區用地分配,並支持院校於2027至2028年起率先進駐。規劃亦提出增加學生宿位、支持院校擴建校園,以及推動職業專才教育及應用科學大學發展。 《施政報告》方面,政府同時會繼續推動「留學香港」、增加海外招生及交流活動,並於本財政年度推出首幅學生宿舍用地,並設立「科教創新基金」推動高等教育界廣泛應用AI及新興科技。 政府未來數年專上教育政策將集中於促進香港專上教育擴容提質、吸引非本地學生、發展北都大學城、增加宿舍供應、推動應

3

16 Sept 2026, 06:01 UTC≈3,170 views12 reactionsread 19 September 2026

【Non JUPAS Personal Statement】 教你點寫出一篇突圍而出嘅Personal Statement! 香港嘅好幾間大學會要求申請人報 Non JUPAS 時提交個人自述,或者英文叫 Personal Statement。一篇好嘅 Personal Statement 可以加深Professor對你嘅印象,並展示你嘅學術興趣、個人目標以及點樣對應你申請嘅科目。透過清晰講述自己嘅長處同對科目嘅興趣,你可以突顯自己嘅優異之處,以及同其他申請者嘅不同之處。對於 Non JUPAS 申請而言, Personal Statement 對取錄與否發揮一定嘅作用。今次會同大家講下寫 Personal Statement 嘅注意事項,協助你突圍而出。 https://www.nonjupas.hk/nonjupas/non-jupas-personal-statement

12

16 Sept 2026, 02:17 UTC≈2,800 views0 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

想問下大家註冊 Telegram 帳號,或者加入我地 tg 討論區時順利嗎? 留意到近期有會員反映話註冊 Telegram 需要付費,如有需要將會作出相應安排。

15 Sept 2026, 12:42 UTC≈2,920 viewsread 19 September 2026

「Asso仔心得一篇」如何可以第一年脫離太空煉獄 https://www.nonjupas.hk/nonjupas/going-to-university-after-a-year-in-asso

Showing the 12 most recent of 79 posts we hold for @nonjupas_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@nonjupas_channel edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
30 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Sept 2026, 01:33 UTCAnonymous Poll13,300 voters approx.

有得俾你揀,你會選擇點樣上堂?

  1. F2F54%
  2. Online46%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTCAnonymous Poll1,640 voters approx.

各位新生會唔會去ocamp

  1. 14%
  2. 唔去35%
  3. 想去但係我嗰科冇搞5%
  4. 睇答案46%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 19 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Non JUPAS 資訊頻道” (@nonjupas_channel), 27,511 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nonjupas_channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.