Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Tunegram

@nonameprj

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

20,893subscribers

-58 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002719577155
TypeChannel
Username@nonameprj
Created14 August 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nonameprj

Growth

20,89320,95120,9229 August 2026 — 20,951 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,951 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,946 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,931 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,925 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,917 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,893 subscribers9 August 202614 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -58. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,884–20,960 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:5620,893-24
13 Aug 2026, 01:2720,917-8
12 Aug 2026, 02:0220,925-6
11 Aug 2026, 01:2520,931-15
10 Aug 2026, 00:4120,946-5
9 Aug 2026, 16:0020,951no change
9 Aug 2026, 15:4820,951first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 14 August 2025the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,427 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥99269.5%
custom 547013503039309015018813.2%
custom 52717773474213711651299.04%
custom 54720266456594015641188.27%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,427reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2025 to 1 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Oct 2025, 07:00 UTC≈5,270 views30 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🎉 Giveaway Completed! 🎁 Prizes awarded: Snoop Dogg #107525, Snoop Dogg #97787, Snoop Dogg #515363, Snoop Dogg #97793, Snoop Dogg #163828, Snoop Dogg #56187, Snoop Dogg #101069, Snoop Dogg #55623 📊 Results: 👥 Total participants: 3615 🎟️ Total tickets: 6432 🏆 Winners selected: 8 🎊 Congratulations to all winners! Check your inventory.

🔥30

29 Sept 2025, 17:39 UTC≈9,700 views226 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🎁 Started Gifts Giveaway! Details: Subscribe: @tunegramcis, @nonameprj Deadline: 01.10.2025 07:00 UTC Rewards: Snoop Dogg #107525, Snoop Dogg #97787, Snoop Dogg #515363, Snoop Dogg #97793, Snoop Dogg #163828, Snoop Dogg #56187, Snoop Dogg #101069, Snoop Dogg #55623 Requirements: • Only Premium Users Participants can now join this giveaway. Good luck!

🔥226

29 Sept 2025, 17:08 UTC≈16,800 views422 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🎂 D Day — Gift Box raffle and free minting NFTs on Oct 10th! 🎧 Tunegram — your digital music world on Telegram, complete with economy, roles, social, and on-chain mechanics. The new meta is here. 😎 The app is available to early access users and requires a key to enter. Find one here, claim your rewards, tap💡 on the table and join D Day for win in raffle! More invites — more chance to win! No brain.

🔥422

29 Sept 2025, 16:43 UTC≈5,680 views123 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🎁 Join My Giveaway! 🏆 Prizes: • Input Key #70731 • Input Key #42379 • Input Key #32119 • ...and 47 more prizes! ⏰ Deadline: 05.10.2025 16:38 UTC 📋 Requirements: • Min. trading volume: 10 TON 🎊 Join now and good luck!

🔥123

3 Sept 2025, 11:28 UTC≈5,060 views22 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🥁 free NFT mint Tunegram September Listen our stream 🎧 Invite fans & stay tuned

🔥22

3 Sept 2025, 11:14 UTC≈3,690 views19 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @byAugustRushPhoto

Gm fans Top3 best inviters rewarded NFT gifts Congrats guys 👏

🔥19

Signed August Rush

29 Aug 2025, 08:06 UTC≈10,700 views78 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Today top3 inviter be rewarded NFT gifts And any inviter will claim 💐 per every 10 your fans Lets move Tunegram 🎧

🔥78

Signed August Rush

28 Aug 2025, 07:21 UTC≈13,400 views72 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🫴Easy drop for fast hands! Fast input one of five low-keys in Tunegram to claim a unique opportunity to unlimited invite channel owners (Chefs) 🔑 w5j1r6 🔑 f3t9h4 🔑 b7c2v8 🔑 x6l4m9 🔑 q1z5n7 Stay tuned 👨‍💻

🔥72

Signed August Rush

27 Aug 2025, 19:46 UTC≈13,700 views58 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🎁 Join This Giveaway! 🏆 Prizes: • Loot Bag #5551 • Loot Bag #12947 • Loot Bag #2641 • ...and 47 more prizes! ⏰ Deadline: 03.09.2025 12:00 UTC 🎊 Join now and good luck!

custom 527177734742137116558

24 Aug 2025, 17:53 UTC≈13,600 views71 reactionsread 14 August 2026

all low-keys are activated 😎 drop completed Find 🗝️ invite in Telegram chats to join and claim reward

custom 527177734742137116571

23 Aug 2025, 23:00 UTC≈11,500 views68 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Autumn’s rolling in and we’re dropping our first OG NFT collection. Right now, 🎟️ 10K tickets are being handed to the early Chefs and Members inside the app until September. Jump in, lock yours, don’t sleep.

custom 547013503039309015047custom 547202664565940156421

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @nonameprj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 747,436 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tunegram” (@nonameprj), 20,893 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nonameprj.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.