Channel
@nominated_for_grammy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003613354175 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nominated_for_grammy |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nominated_for_grammy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 14 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 14 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 367 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#weekly@nominated_for_grammy 31.07.26 - 06.08.26 засыпать под «Беспечного рыцаря тьмы» — охуенно не выкупил прикола ooes Типа, хорошие песни, но что такого неописуемого там люди нашли? А Гага — лега. 😎
Photo, posted without a caption
что пытался сделать любой уважающий себя мужчина в 14 лет
100 gecs дают мне сил жить
#meme@nominated_for_grammy
softscars — м̵̱̦͐͠н̵̭̈͝е̵̟͐ ̴͋ͅн̶̻̀͠е̷̽͠ ̵͍̼̌̂б̷̖̟̑͗о̴͚̉л̸̬̲̐̈́ь̶̠̪̄н̸̨͘о̵͈̹̅͐ softscars — хороший пример того, как можно в поп добавить гитар и не звучать как говнарь глитчевые звуки соседствуют с рёвом от дисторшна, и вся эта конструкция не бесит Но с таким коктейлем не хватает напора. Есть пара-тройка драйвовых песен, но остальные гораздо спокойнее, хотя и расслабляющими их не назовёшь точно. "inferno" вообще зв…
#weekly@nominated_for_grammy 24.07.26 - 30.07.26 PARTYNEXTDOOR TWO — один из тех случаев, когда я послушал по дороге один раз и забил. теперь решил глубже разобраться (всё ещё не дослушал) Был вайбик трип-хопа. И "The Sound of Silence" — хорошая песня, а не только мелодия из Ютуба середины 10-ых.
#weekly@nominated_for_grammy 17.07.26 - 23.07.26 переслушал softscars, обзор скоро ещё любимчиков погонял особенно ухо зацепилось за “diamonds” бит внеземной люблю клауд-рэп
Не получится. Я убью себя.
#meme@nominated_for_grammy
D>E>A>T>H>M>E>T>A>L — музыка из прошлой жизни продолжение "Laputa" демонстрирует акустику, что-то более живое, чтобы потом сверху докинуть тяжёлые барабаны, вызывая диссонанс. В завершение "The Eyes of Ibad" гладит тебя по голове чистой электрогитарой и вместе с этим сканирует жужжащим синтом, а минималистичная драмка только дополняет картину. всю демку можно описать как «дискомфортный уют» вроде бы и приятные мел…
D>E>A>T>H>M>E>T>A>L — музыка из прошлой жизни Если кому-нибудь, кто не знаком с Panchiko, рассказать историю группы, то наверняка этот кто-то не поверит. Неудивительно, ведь всё это звучит как чья-то влажная мечта. Школьники записали демку, она оказалась никому не нужной, спустя 20 лет какой-то чел случайно нашёл их диск, и теперь уже дядьки колесят с концертами и создают новые альбомы, красота же! Но это правда, и …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nominated_for_grammy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,214,359 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Номинирован на Грэмми” (@nominated_for_grammy), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nominated_for_grammy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.