Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Security nomad

@nomadsecurity

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,164subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002231478917
TypeChannel
Username@nomadsecurity
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nomadsecurity

Growth

1,1621,1641,1637 August 2026 — 1,162 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,162 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,164 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,162–1,164 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 03:011,164+2
7 Aug 2026, 23:341,162no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:011,162first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
62.6%
avg views ÷ 1,164 subscribers
Avg views / post
728
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (4 April 20264 August 2026)
Views total5,826
Reactions total73
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

248 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁7530.2%
🔥5622.6%
3212.9%
👍2610.5%
🤣218.47%
🤔135.24%
🤡114.44%
👏52.02%
❤‍🔥31.21%
😍20.806%
🤝20.806%
10.403%
🫡10.403%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 248reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC428 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"Всех ИТшников заменит ИИ" (с) Так же влияние ИИ на найм в ИТ-компании: Пояснение: Тут ребята с одной джобборды посмотрели динамику числа вакансий разных ИТ-компаний (от бигтеха до стартапов), наложили получившийся график на даты выхода самых заметных нейронок. И получили интересную картину - несмотря на то, что в сравнении с постковидным бумом, мы сейчас живём в сильно просевшем рынке, нейронки на найм повлияли при

8🤔3👍1

2 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC545 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Тут топ-вакансию в техподдержке СЗИ подвезли! Налетай! https://hh.ru/vacancy/135749799

🤡11😁72

28 Jul 2026, 13:45 UTC860 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Роадмап v1.1 Патчноут 1. Обнаружил важный пробел в терминологии - полностью отсутствовала ветка виртуализации. Добавлено 2. Вспомнил, что мы живём в 2026 году. Добавлена ветка безопасности AI (как защита самого ИИ от атак на него, так и защита от агента) 2.1 Добавил отдельный трек AI-security 3. Поправил имена скачиваемых роадмапов 4. Добавил английскую версию сайта (готовимся к выходу гетментора на международный уро

🔥103

28 Jul 2026, 08:48 UTC822 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Тут последние пару дней активно обсуждают кейс по увольнению ТОП-менеджера московской компании за то, что та через личную почту передавала данные DeepSeek. Я решил копнуть чуть глубже громких заголовков, чтобы понять хронологию событий. И получилась интересная картина. Судя по всему, проблемы у сотрудницы начались далеко не с ИИ. И это даже не было основной причиной увольнения. Вот хронология событий на основании ре

🤔7

22 Jul 2026, 09:17 UTC903 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Верим?

  1. Да, похоже на правду. Скоро нейронки взбунтуются16%
  2. Нет, больше похоже на очередную рекламу нового поколения нейронок64%
  3. Посмотреть ответы20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Jul 2026, 09:16 UTC758 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всё веселее и веселее... Очередной пост вышел от HF и OpenAI об инциденте, о котором писал вчера. Опубликовали официальную версию случившегося - "OpenAI сняли все ограничения со своей новой нейронки (чтобы получить максимально честный результат) и начали тестить её в песочнице на способности ко взлому. Конкретно - пытались оценить её по бенчмарку ExploitGym. Нейронка нашла Zero-Day, который позволил ей вырваться из

😁6

21 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC732 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кому интересно почитать полный отчёт на русском - прикладываю ниже. В начале этой недели мы обнаружили и пресекли попытку взлома части нашей производственной инфраструктуры. Этот инцидент отличался от всех предыдущих, с которыми нам приходилось сталкиваться, одним важным аспектом: он был полностью организован и осуществлен автономной системой ИИ-агентов, а мы обнаружили и проанализировали его в основном с помощью на

👍8

21 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC778 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Полностью автономная ИИ-атака... Тут на днях HuggingFace опубликовали отчёт об атаке на их инфраструктуру. Примечательно в нём то, что, согласно ему, он проходил полностью без участия человека. Если вкратце - через заражённый датасет агент получил доступ к инфраструктуре, собрал все возможные облачные доступы и полез дальше через рой краткоживущих песочниц. Что любопытно, когда безопасники HF остановили атаку и нача

👍7

4 Jul 2026, 07:34 UTC≈1,210 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Итак, отрисовка роадмапа закончена полностью! Как уже писал ранее - добавлен поиск, возможность кастомизации и скачивания кастомизированной версии. Чутка улучшен интерфейс десктопной версии и добавлена мобильная. С мобилки пользоваться, на мой взгляд, не очень удобно всё ещё. Но сейчас это стало, хотя бы, возможно) Убрана большая часть лагов при сильном отдалении роадмапа. А так же добавлен режим сравнения - можете

🔥17❤‍🔥3👍2🫡1

1 Jul 2026, 06:20 UTC≈1,110 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Роадмап... Как я уже сказал, после приспособления пары нейронок к процессу отрисовки, работа над ним ускорилась. Поэтому, вырисовываются более-менее финальные контуры. Помимо отрисовки, накинул функционал, который мне нужен будет для финального этапа работы над роадмапом, а вам - для максимальной гибкости работы с ним. Во-первых - поиск. С таким массивом данных без него никуда. Во-вторых, теперь помимо уже готовых

11

24 Jun 2026, 15:47 UTC≈1,200 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Что там по роадмапу? Что-то я подумал, что закинуть идею о нём и не отчитываться о прогрессе - наверно, не очень. Поэтому, отчёт: в общем, работа там масштабная, но частично приспособили нейронки к ней, поэтому, всё пошло быстрее. В целом, отобраны все основные термины (решили взять чуть с запасом, а не только самый минимум, который необходим для становления безопасником, так что, сильно не пугайтесь). Отрисованы на

🔥11👏3😍21

2 Jun 2026, 17:00 UTC≈1,480 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Интересные новости тут появились... Несколько человек вывели в топ hh компанию "Рога и копыта" исключительно с помощью ботов. Потрясающая платформа! Собственно, LinkedIn и поиск по каналам тг были более эффективны уже давно, но сегодня платформа, видимо, совсем мертва...

😁7

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nomadsecurity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jul 2026, 09:17 UTCFinal Results119 voters

Верим?

  1. Да, похоже на правду. Скоро нейронки взбунтуются16%
  2. Нет, больше похоже на очередную рекламу нового поколения нейронок64%
  3. Посмотреть ответы20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,152,029 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Security nomad” (@nomadsecurity), 1,164 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nomadsecurity.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.