Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for نکته و تست رایگان زبان

Channel

نکته و تست رایگان زبان

@noktetestraygan

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

5,940subscribers

+785 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002532097442
TypeChannel
Username@noktetestraygan
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/noktetestraygan

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,1555,9405,547.56 August 2026 — 5,155 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,169 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,296 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,348 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,377 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,463 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,523 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,558 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,600 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,665 subscribers3 September 2026 — 5,753 subscribers8 September 2026 — 5,831 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,868 subscribers16 September 2026 — 5,940 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net +785. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,037–6,058 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 21:005,940+72
13 Sept 2026, 01:575,868+37
8 Sept 2026, 18:185,831+78
3 Sept 2026, 12:195,753+88
31 Aug 2026, 04:075,665+65
28 Aug 2026, 12:325,600+42
25 Aug 2026, 05:485,558+35
22 Aug 2026, 15:355,523+60
19 Aug 2026, 00:225,463+86
15 Aug 2026, 15:525,377+29
12 Aug 2026, 08:035,348+52
9 Aug 2026, 18:115,296+127
7 Aug 2026, 01:185,169+14
6 Aug 2026, 07:025,155first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 28 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 36 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

4,921 reactions across 31 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,921100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,369 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC≈1,010 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026

دوستان یه نکته مهم: این تبلیغاتی که وقتی وارد کانال میشید میبینید برای خود تلگرامه، به هیچ وجه مورد تایید نیست و کلا جدی نگیرید. متاسفانه نمیشه حذفش هم کرد.

54

11 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC≈1,210 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026

دوره جذاب «خدادادی مدیا»: نمونه محتوا و اطلاعات ثبت نام

33

11 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC≈1,330 views133 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

29- The initial response to the newly developed treatment was deeply.........., as most patients showed little or no improvement despite receiving the recommended dosage.

  1. disappointing82%
  2. reliable6%
  3. authentic5%
  4. curative7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

133

11 Aug 2026, 06:57 UTC≈1,740 views270 reactionsread 12 August 2026

دانشجوی عزیزی پیام دادن به بنده و گفتن یه کلاس نکته و تست چند میلیونی ثبت نام کردن و قسم میخورن اونقدی که با این ۲۸ تست رایگان این کانال لغت و نکته یاد گرفتن، تو اون دوره یاد نگرفتن! امیدوارم بیشتر ارزش قائل بشید برای این محتوای رایگان و حسابی ازش استفاده کنید و حسابی هم حمایت کنید و به بقیه معرفی کنید

270

11 Aug 2026, 06:36 UTC≈1,760 views184 reactionsread 12 August 2026

برای تست 29 آماده اید؟

184

10 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC≈2,040 views107 reactionsread 12 August 2026

لغت negate تدریس شد خدمتتون لغت شماره 146 @Just1wordperday

107

10 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC≈2,080 views215 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

تحلیل تست شماره 28 امیدوارم لذت ببرید✨ اگر حال کردی با این تست، ایموجی قلب این پیام فراموش نشه

215

10 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC≈2,080 views113 reactionsread 12 August 2026

میبینم که رکورد زدید و در کمتر از ۲۴ ساعت جوابا ۱۰۰۰ رو رد کرد😁😍

113

9 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC≈2,250 views79 reactionsread 12 August 2026

راستی امشب شروع دوره تقریباً رایگان «خدادادی مدیا» هست و کلی محتوای جذاب داریم. جا نمونید که خیلی خفنه🤝 چیزی هم حذف نمیشه و دسترسیتون همیشگی هست. نمونه محتوا نحوه ثبت نام

79

9 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC≈2,440 views269 reactionsread 12 August 2026

تعریف از خود نباشه ولی عجب تستی خداوکیلی😂 جنس شناسا میفهمن چی میگم. انصافاً از این شبیه تر به کنکور؟

269

9 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTC≈2,460 views273 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

28- The widespread use of antibiotics has raised concerns that certain bacterial strains may become resistant, thereby..........the effectiveness of conventional treatments.

  1. fortify18%
  2. predict15%
  3. persevere18%
  4. negate49%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

273

9 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC≈1,310 views145 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @English_with_KhodadadiVoice message

داوطلبین ارشد ۱۴۰۵ حتما گوش بدید توضیحاتی در مورد دفترچه ثبت نام کنکور و حواشی مربوط به اون @English_with_Khodadadi

145

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @noktetestraygan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz599 voters

29- The initial response to the newly developed treatment was deeply.........., as most patients showed little or no improvement despite receiving the recommended dosage.

  1. disappointing82%
  2. reliable6%
  3. authentic5%
  4. curative7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,250 voters approx.

28- The widespread use of antibiotics has raised concerns that certain bacterial strains may become resistant, thereby..........the effectiveness of conventional treatments.

  1. fortify18%
  2. predict15%
  3. persevere18%
  4. negate49%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,220 voters approx.

27- The benefits of the new health policy are............; hospitals have already reported measurable improvements in patient care.

  1. imaginary18%
  2. tangible53%
  3. obscure16%
  4. adverse13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,220 voters approx.

26- Despite limited financial resources, the research team made..........progress in identifying novel biomarkers for early cancer detection.

  1. tentative18%
  2. intermittent15%
  3. tedious10%
  4. tremendous57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jul 2026, 19:55 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,490 voters approx.

25- The researchers decided to revise the study protocol because several procedures were found to..........international ethical standards.

  1. promote32%
  2. comply with18%
  3. contravene39%
  4. disclose11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Jul 2026, 15:36 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,420 voters approx.

24- The unauthorized disclosure of patient records was considered a serious...........of professional ethics.

  1. observation25%
  2. approval16%
  3. breach32%
  4. commitment27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نکته و تست رایگان زبان” (@noktetestraygan), 5,940 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/noktetestraygan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.