🔐 В первом полугодии 2026 года сумма краж криптовалюты с применением насилия превысила 30 млн долларов. Физические нападения на держателей криптовалюты — включая вторжения в дома, похищения и нападения на родственников — уже обусловили значительные потери. Эта цифра уже превысила половину рекорда всего 2025 года в 58 млн долларов, что наводит на мысль, что общий итог за 2026 год может превысить прошлогодний пик. Фр…

Channel
NO FOMO | Криптовалюты
@nofomoTG
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,777subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001672212813 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nofomoTG |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nofomoTG |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 3,777 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 3,782 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 3,787 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 3,788 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 3,788 | first reading |
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.11%
- avg views ÷ 3,777 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 41.9
- 37 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 37
- of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (5 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,551 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 06s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🇺🇸 Трамп: криптовалюта – это серьёзное явление. Я замечаю, что люди всё чаще используют биткойны для расчетов, и многие уже почти забыли о наличных деньгах. @nofomoTG #Трамп #криптовалюта #биткойн
👋 FlashTrade сообщили, что если не удастся найти заинтересованного покупателя, они постепенно свернут свою деятельность. @nofomoTG #FlashTrade #покупатель #свертывание_деятельности
📉 Объем фьючерсов на централизованных биржах (CEX) снизился до минимума с декабря 2023 года. @nofomoTG #объем #фьючерсы #централизованные_биржи
🇺🇸👀 Вероятность повышения ставки ФРС в сентябре существенно снизилась после выхода данных по занятости за июль, которые оказались значительно ниже ожиданий. Отчет продемонстрировал замедление темпов найма и пересмотр показателей в сторону понижения. Это ослабило давление на ФРС по повышению ставок в сентябре. Тем не менее, уровень безработицы сократился до минимума за два года, так как число американцев, ищущих рабо…
💵 Polygon обеспечил первый платёж в Японии с использованием стейблкоина в крупной сети магазинов. Это важный этап для внедрения криптовалюты в повседневные покупки в стране, известной своими прогрессивными подходами к цифровым финансам. @nofomoTG #Polygon #япония #криптовалюта
🇺🇸🕹 Тим Скотт, председатель банковского комитета Сената, сообщил, что Сенат должен провести первое голосование по закону CLARITY Act до начала работы законодательного органа в государственных учреждениях на этой неделе. @nofomoTG #Тим_Скотт #CLARITY_Act #Сенат
😲🚀 поднялся на 23% на биржах Upbit и Bithumb. 📊 График 👈 @nofomoTG #поднялся #биржи #Upbit
📊⛏️ Согласно данным WuBlockchain Data Center, на 06.08.2026 из 22 анализируемых моделей майнеров BTC примерно 22,7% работают с ежедневным чистым убытком. Наиболее эффективная модель начинает быть убыточной при цене $46 787. @nofomoTG #BTC #майнинг #убытки
🦊 MetaMask запустил Agent Wallet — кошелек для ИИ-агентов, который позволяет им самостоятельно выполнять криптotransaktsii в рамках заданных ограничений и правил. Каждая транзакция проходит симуляцию и проверки безопасности, а сделки защищены страховкой Transaction Protection на сумму до $10,000 в месяц. @nofomoTG #MetaMask #Agent_Wallet #ИИ_агенты
Слили информацию о готовности улучшений для каждого подарка 🎁 @nofomoTG #готовность #улучшения #подарки
📊🐳 По данным Santiment, крупные держатели Биткоина продолжают накапливать монеты, в то время как мелкие инвесторы распродают свои активы. @nofomoTG #Биткоин #крупные_держатели #инвестиции
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @nofomoTG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 899,178 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NO FOMO | Криптовалюты” (@nofomoTG), 3,777 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nofomoTG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.