Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🦋 NoFap Rebirth 🗿 Motivação ⚡️ Saúde 🪽 Liberdade

Channel

🦋 NoFap Rebirth 🗿 Motivação ⚡️ Saúde 🪽 Liberdade

@nofaprebirth

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

31,082subscribers

-1,023 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001386510594
TypeChannel
Username@nofaprebirth
Description𝕽𝖊𝖇𝖎𝖗𝖙𝖍 𝖁𝖎𝖗𝖙𝖚𝖘 ༒ 𝕺 𝖗𝖊𝖓𝖆𝖘𝖈𝖎𝖒𝖊𝖓𝖙𝖔 𝖒𝖔𝖗𝖆𝖑 🦋 NoFap Rebirth 🗿 Motivação ⚡️ Saúde 🪽 Liberdade Soberania individual, NoFap, desenvolvimento pessoal, motivaçao, independencia.
Created26 December 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nofaprebirth

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

31,08232,11031,5966 August 2026 — 32,105 subscribers6 August 2026 — 32,105 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,085 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32,060 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,031 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,006 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,967 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,110 subscribers13 August 2026 — 32,069 subscribers14 August 2026 — 32,029 subscribers16 August 2026 — 31,988 subscribers17 August 2026 — 31,933 subscribers18 August 2026 — 31,916 subscribers19 August 2026 — 31,940 subscribers20 August 2026 — 31,975 subscribers21 August 2026 — 31,911 subscribers23 August 2026 — 31,869 subscribers24 August 2026 — 31,811 subscribers25 August 2026 — 31,791 subscribers26 August 2026 — 31,866 subscribers27 August 2026 — 31,822 subscribers28 August 2026 — 31,789 subscribers29 August 2026 — 31,754 subscribers30 August 2026 — 31,728 subscribers31 August 2026 — 31,690 subscribers1 September 2026 — 31,659 subscribers2 September 2026 — 31,717 subscribers4 September 2026 — 31,685 subscribers6 September 2026 — 31,626 subscribers9 September 2026 — 31,546 subscribers12 September 2026 — 31,478 subscribers14 September 2026 — 31,449 subscribers15 September 2026 — 31,414 subscribers17 September 2026 — 31,379 subscribers30 September 2026 — 31,082 subscribers6 August 202630 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 54 days, net -1,023. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,928–32,264 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Sept 2026, 01:4231,082-297
17 Sept 2026, 23:3831,379-35
15 Sept 2026, 20:4131,414-35
14 Sept 2026, 00:5731,449-29
12 Sept 2026, 04:3731,478-68
9 Sept 2026, 21:0231,546-80
6 Sept 2026, 15:1631,626-59
4 Sept 2026, 01:3831,685-32
2 Sept 2026, 18:0631,717+58
1 Sept 2026, 18:1231,659-31
31 Aug 2026, 17:2531,690-38
30 Aug 2026, 20:1431,728-26
29 Aug 2026, 22:2531,754-35
28 Aug 2026, 20:1431,789-33
27 Aug 2026, 19:4331,822-44
26 Aug 2026, 18:0431,866+75
25 Aug 2026, 16:3531,791-20
24 Aug 2026, 19:3631,811-58
23 Aug 2026, 06:3831,869-42
21 Aug 2026, 21:2831,911first reading

Engagement

303 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.537%
avg views ÷ 31,082 subscribers
Avg views / post
167
138 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
146
of 303 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 62 of 138 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 October 2026
Posts held303 (31 July 2026 – 4 October 2026)
Views total23,030
Reactions total259
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Oct 2026, 23:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,160
Videos
≈1,290
Links
≈1,650

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 00m
Average length
1m 23s

Measured directly from 44 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

719 reactions across 157 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💊12717.7%
🗿12317.1%
😁10114.0%
🏆7610.6%
⚡709.74%
🔥456.26%
💔446.12%
😢324.45%
🕊233.20%
🤬233.20%
🤷‍♂141.95%
💘131.81%
🤡111.53%
🤮101.39%
💅50.695%
👎20.278%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 157 of the 303 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 719 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 303 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 4 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Oct 2026, 23:09 UTC5 viewsread 4 October 2026
Photo

Se não fosse pelo amaldiçoado estado de São Paulo - Conhecido como Shimpaulo - Flávio Bolsonaro teria vencido no 1º turno. O problema é que a concentração Woke, NPC, femimi, nóias, vagabundos, ladrões, criminosos, lgtv e bandidólatras de SP é ENORME!!!! 😲🤖😡🇷🇺👮😲👃😮🫵👨‍❤️‍👨🏳️‍🌈😎👿😝

4 Oct 2026, 22:10 UTC26 viewsread 4 October 2026

📰 Notícias e tecnologia! Informação e inovação em um só lugar. 💻 Entre no @UpCanaisBot e fique atualizado!

4 Oct 2026, 20:19 UTC43 viewsread 4 October 2026
Forwarded from @magfiadvertisement_br2

Posted without readable text

4 Oct 2026, 18:15 UTC50 viewsread 4 October 2026
Forwarded from @rebirthpromosPhoto

🤑🤑🔥 MUITO BARATO! Barra Fixa de Porta para Exercícios Ajustável 62 a 100 CM Crossfit Calistenia Fitness Força R$ 99,97 por R$ 38,99 🛒 Shopee Brasil ⚠️ Este post é um anúncio e contém link que leva à loja. Valores sujeitos a alteração. 🥰 Mais promoções 🔥 @rebirthpromos

4 Oct 2026, 13:02 UTC80 views1 reactionsread 4 October 2026
Photo

Feminismo é doença mental grave. ⚔️⚔️ ⚔️⚔️ Siga @nofaprebirth 🦋 ⚔️⚔️⚔️ ⚔️🦋⚔️ ⚔️⚔️⚔️ ⚔️⚔️

😁1

4 Oct 2026, 12:14 UTC83 views3 reactionsread 4 October 2026

flavio é um feministo imundo. E o feminismo é uma ideologia anticristã. No entanto, o Lule e seus aliados também são feministas, mas quebraram o país. Lule é muito pior. É preciso ter senso de proporção. 💊 E Rollo Tomasi, pai da red já dizia que todas as eleições passariam a tratar de políticas de gênero. 🙅‍♀️🌟👊👩💋🌟

💊2💔1

4 Oct 2026, 12:12 UTC74 viewsread 4 October 2026
Forwarded from @magfiadvertisement_br1

Posted without readable text

4 Oct 2026, 12:08 UTC69 views3 reactionsread 4 October 2026

🚨Apuração no exterior até o momento 🙅‍♀️🌟👩Flávio - 22.794 votos (60,9%) 🤒❤️👿 Lula - 9.876 votos (26,4%)

⚡2🔥1

4 Oct 2026, 11:55 UTC72 views6 reactionsread 4 October 2026
Photo

🇯🇵 Japão 🇯🇵 📊 Na apuração parcial de 60 das 119 urnas, Flávio Bolsonaro vence. Tinha 12.066 votos, contra 2.240 de Lula — mais de 80% dos votos apurados para Flávio. ⭐️ ❗️ A votação brasileira no Japão acontece no horário local, então eles votam bem antes do Brasil por causa do fuso. O Japão está 12 horas à frente de Brasília nesta eleição. ⏰ Enquanto no Brasil a votação começa às 8h de Brasília, no Japão já são 2…

🏆3🗿2💊1

4 Oct 2026, 11:35 UTC63 viewsread 4 October 2026
Photo

Tenha certeza que há feministas achando isso maravilhoso. O feminismo pode ser considerado o culto à Lilith. É satanico. ⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️ ⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️ ⚔️⚔️Siga @nofaprebirth

4 Oct 2026, 11:30 UTC61 viewsread 4 October 2026
Forwarded from @magfiadvertisement_br2

Posted without readable text

Showing the 12 most recent of 303 posts we hold for @nofaprebirth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@nofaprebirth edited 10 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 October 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Aug 2026, 21:49 UTCAnonymous Poll50 voters

Em qual candidato você pretende votar para presidente?

  1. Eu não voto24%
  2. Flávio Bolsonaro — 22 (PL)50%
  3. Pablo Marçal — 28 (PRTB)16%
  4. Lula — (PT)10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 303 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 4 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🦋 NoFap Rebirth 🗿 Motivação ⚡️ Saúde 🪽 Liberdade” (@nofaprebirth), 31,082 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nofaprebirth.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.