Channel
@noema_marketing
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
504subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001781180062 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @noema_marketing |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/noema_marketing |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 504 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 506 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:39 | 506 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 3 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (3 May 2026 – 24 July 2026) |
| Views total | 111 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
254 reactions across 13 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 156 | 61.4% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 9.45% | |
| 💯 | 19 | 7.48% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 4.72% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 4.72% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 2.76% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 1.97% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 1.97% | |
| 🙈 | 5 | 1.97% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 1.18% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.787% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.394% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.394% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.394% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.394% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 254reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @noema_marketing. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 May 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Давайте обсудим ⬇️ Редакция 360 пришла с вопросом, «почему зумеры скупаются ретро гаджеты?» Я написала свое мнение и поделилась двумя гипотезами. И мне интересно, как вы считаете, почему это поколение не гонится за инновациями, а оборачивается на то, что для людей возраста 30+ является ностальгией? А может у нас есть и те, кто купил сейчас проводные наушники, Polaroid или касетник 🫢?
❤9
Смотрю коллег и понимаю, что большинство маркетологов изучают инструменты. А сильные маркетологи, за кем я наблюдаю, изучают людей. Мне конечно очень лестно, что к этому я пришла в самом начале своего проф пути, мне всегда было интересно изучать сторону: - поведения людей - принятия решений - восприятия ценности - формирования доверия - клиентского опыта - идентичности Потому что инструменты меняются каждые 2–3 год…
❤27🔥5👏1🙈1🙏1
Video message, posted without a caption
Почему люди болеют летом? Меня это категорически не устраивает! А в пятницу тем более 😭
❤10💔5
Пока жители Лужников собирают протесты по массовым гуляниям в их районе.. Маркетинг Сергея Семёновича не знает границ 💪🏼 Как рассказывает Москвичка 30 мая в «Лужниках» пройдёт большой «День Московского спорта» — с тренировками, мастер-классами, экстрим-зонами и концертом под открытым небом. Нам обещают помимо спортивного досуга Zivert, SHAMAN, LYRIQ, «Чили» и других)) Погоду вот только не обещают, 10 - 14 градусов…
❤17👎3🤔2
Ozon убил маленькие радости. Я много изучаю статистику, изменения покупательского спроса и поведения. И есть у меня непопулярное мнение… Раньше поход в магазин был почти событием. Поехать в торговый центр всей семьей, ходить между полками, что-то трогать, сравнивать. Случайно находить вещи, которые даже не собирался покупать 🤣 Покупка была эмоцией. А сейчас? Мы лежим ночью в кровати и заказываем: — батарейки — н…
💯10❤5👍4
26 мая — день российского предпринимательства. Хочется сказать «выпьем не чекаясь», а если серьезно⬇️ Невозможно безучастно смотреть на то, что происходит на рынке. Все, кто сейчас продолжают вести бизнес (кофейни, салоны, клиники, магазины, студии, производства) — это люди, которым правда хочется аплодировать. Потому что во многом именно благодаря им мы за последние годы очень быстро привыкли к хорошему. Мы уже…
❤15👏6🔥4
Подъехал креатив 🔥 Достойно рубрики)) Как считаете, все средства хороши?)
❤8🔥8🤣2
-20% на ваш любимый продукт, завтра последний день И вот я уже жду доставку на 5270₽ Обожаю (как маркетолог) ВкусВилл за их пуш уведомления и то, как они мотивируют на покупку даже тогда, когда ты её не планируешь) Пуш-уведомления — это один из самых сильных инструментов для спонтанных покупок, особенно в продуктах питания. Для бизнеса это огромный инструмент роста прибыли, потому что пуши: ✅ возвращают клиентов…
❤14💯9👏5
Сервис? Простота хуже воровства? Недавно была на педикюре в салоне высокого уровня (9к за педикюр). На мой вопрос, какого бренда покрытия есть, мастер начала было перечислять, но сразу себя остановила со словами: «зачем вам, вы все равно не разбираетесь!» Обсудим? Что скажете в защиту мастера? Или клиента? А я поделюсь потом своими мыслями и эмоциями в моменте.
❤8🤔5🙈4
Ура! Пятница 😂
😁12👍1🥰1
Шаман лизал, чтоб мы все это видели.. Недавно в запрещенной соц сети я написала пост про 3 ошибки в контенте А сегодня хочу написать про другую крайность, когда персонаж или даже бренд кричит, но особо не задумывается о том, что именно.🫠 Да, не спорю, так можно получить миллионные охваты. Репосты, мемы, обсуждения всей страны. Шаман лизнул Байкал, и получил именно это.🙈 🙌🏻 Но моё убеждение, что хайп - это не стра…
❤22🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @noema_marketing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Я создала такого AI Агента 🔥, который нужен каждому, кто продает через контент! Но сначала вопрос: ВЫ ПОЛЬЗУЕТЕСЬ ИИ?
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 24 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Маркетинг без паники” (@noema_marketing), 504 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/noema_marketing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.