Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Nochnajaskazka - Блог об этом🔞

Channel

Nochnajaskazka - Блог об этом🔞

@nochnajaskazkka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

52,504subscribers

+60 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001258001753
TypeChannel
Username@nochnajaskazkka
Description🔞Блог про научную сексологию, оторванную уздечку, оргазм, любовь и умение классно делать куни и минет. Дюрексу вход воспрещён 😂 По вопросам сотрудничества: @nochnajaskazka Основной сайт: Nochnajaskazka.ru Регистрация в РКН: https://clck.ru/3SUtyP
Created31 October 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nochnajaskazkka

Growth

52,44452,51852,4817 August 2026 — 52,444 subscribers8 August 2026 — 52,447 subscribers9 August 2026 — 52,456 subscribers10 August 2026 — 52,457 subscribers11 August 2026 — 52,462 subscribers12 August 2026 — 52,476 subscribers13 August 2026 — 52,518 subscribers14 August 2026 — 52,513 subscribers16 August 2026 — 52,512 subscribers17 August 2026 — 52,504 subscribers52,5047 August 202617 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 11 days, net +60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,433–52,529 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 19:4852,504-8
16 Aug 2026, 14:4552,512-1
14 Aug 2026, 22:2852,513-5
13 Aug 2026, 10:2852,518+42
12 Aug 2026, 06:5452,476+14
11 Aug 2026, 06:4752,462+5
10 Aug 2026, 04:1152,457+1
9 Aug 2026, 02:3152,456+9
8 Aug 2026, 01:3652,447+3
7 Aug 2026, 01:4552,444first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.7%
avg views ÷ 52,504 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,400
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held17 (23 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total194,040
Reactions total6,222
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,820
Videos
482
Links
240

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
57s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,222 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,14350.5%
❤‍🔥1,39222.4%
🔥77312.4%
🥰4236.80%
😁2133.42%
🤯741.19%
😢570.916%
👏440.707%
🤔440.707%
🤬350.563%
🎉150.241%
👌50.08%
😱40.064%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,222reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 17 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nochnajaskazkka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
11.8%
2 of 17 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
12,700
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
10,800
over 15 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGdFrL1123 July 202623 July 2026
2W5zFJcttJu13 August 20263 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC≈5,180 views472 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Photo

Кажется нужно объясниться. Да, у меня с брендом максус был неприятный скандал. Они решили что со мной нужно дружить, предложили перемирие, я с вашего разрешения - согласилась. Но! У меня был скандал с брендом, претензий к продукции у меня никогда не было. 90% их продукции у меня всегда набирали большие баллы и до сих пор в золотых пантеонах. Даже после перетестов и времени и моей обиды на бренд 😂 Но я хочу чтобы в

365🔥72👏32❤‍🔥3

16 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC≈7,540 views646 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Сейчас будет гореть жопа…. И это не от анального секса. А от пиздеца.. Это самое ужасное что может сделать человек - заставлять своего партнера делать то, во что не готов вкладываться ты сам. Я объясню: ⚡️анальный секс для многих людей интересен, да. Но! НО! До той поры, пока они не осознают, что это не такой же секс как и вагинальный. Туда нельзя так же легко войти через «потерпи я быстро» или «потерпи, там после

464🔥93❤‍🔥49🤬33🤯6👌1

14 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC≈9,420 views414 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Парочка из Москвы сожгла половые органы после секса со смазкой с перцем чили. Короче взрослая пара, около 35, оказались в больнице с сильными отеками и жжением в области гениталий - боль была такой сильной, что им было тяжело передвигаться. Увидела новость, решили обсудить Выяснилось, что ребята, решили разнообразить свою любовную жизнь и купили какую-то фигню на вб с капсаицином. У мужчины дико распух член, а у нее

237😁92🤯60👏8❤‍🔥7😢5😱4🥰1

13 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTC≈11,000 views415 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Что интересного будет в блоге и какие у меня планы чтобы вам было со мной интересно и жарко? Те кто на меня давно подписан, могли заметить что моя активность волнами и фазами, я постепенно собираю весь ресурс чтобы сделать что-то прекрасное, интересное и крутое. Я так и не поняла как с этим бороться, пришлось принять. Но мне нужно вам рассказать что я задумала на ближайшее время. ♥️Если вы пропустили - я готовлю

❤‍🔥262104🔥44😁2👌1🤯1😢1

12 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC≈11,200 views332 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Где я шляюсь опять? Где контент?! Я пока ем вкусную рыбу, рассказываю. Я геймер и когда ты долго ждешь игру и она выходит, простите тут как бы сам бог велел… сначала вышла игра где для сдвгшников как терапия книжки перекладываешь, потом свой аквапарк строишь… ну я короче и пропала оторваться не могла. Что поделать, у меня душа требует… А потом я поняла что ресурс готов к новым свершениям и я писала и создавала мно

🔥20783❤‍🔥30🥰12

4 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC≈15,300 views104 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Слушайте, а что вы смотрите в ютубе? Какие каналы? Меня тру краем достал, не могу больше

78😁19😢4🔥2❤‍🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC≈15,800 views252 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Ой я вам такое принесла! Вы должны это посмотреть! Желательно с партнерами. 🖤Сериал «Непристойный бизнес» Я когда начинала смотреть, вообще не ожидала ничего, так, на фон. А в конце разрыдалась. Это сериал из 8 серий по 30 минут. Фильм в стиле 80х. О чем? Скромная религиозная женщина узнает что бизнес по прокату видеофильмов её мужа погряз в долгах, и чтобы выжить она переделывает его в прокат порно фильмов ориенти

188❤‍🔥56🔥3🤔3😁2

3 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC≈12,700 views97 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFJcttJuPhoto

Возвращение легенды на рынок – FunFactory Miss Be Когда я только начинала вести блог, моей самой желанной мечтой было попробовать игрушки FunFactory. Они были чем-то недосягаемым, безумно дорогим и когда впервые мне их прислали, я их просто положила на полочку и любовалась. Тогда эти игрушки считались максимальным люксом, а вуманайзера еще не было, вернее был, но пошлый и леопердовый. Шло время, а знаменитая Miss B

84❤‍🔥10🔥2🥰1

2 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC≈10,700 views395 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

В общем, посмотрим что будет дальше между мной и максус. Потому что я хз сама как выходить правильно из таких репутационных скандалов. Учитывая что это всё видела огромная аудитория и куча людей за ней. Конечно, наверное было бы правильно если бы мне написал главный, но с другой стороны кто я такая чтобы со мной такой дядя общался. И насколько я поняла, это инициатива Елены со мной помириться, а главный считает чт

299🥰44🔥31🤔16👌3❤‍🔥1😁1

2 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC≈10,300 views520 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

АЛЯРМ... Мне написала представитель бренда Максус. Если помните, несколько месяцев назад я на них очень обиделась и обиделась заслужено. Мой пост (читать тут) разлетелся так сильно что его видела вся индустрия. Но сами Максус мне не писали, до вчерашнего дня. И вот сегодня мы встретились лично. Встретились и я узнала, что было за той историей. Оказалось что со мной общалась новенькая девочка, которая не понимала

❤‍🔥34494🔥39🤔25😢8🤯7😁3

1 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC≈10,800 views269 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Я вам вчера не показала ЕЩЁ! Я тогда, после дегустации, взяла тестовый образец и поехала в свой любимый Lovemarket, чтобы ребята профи, которые тоже дотошные до качества продукции, попробовали, понюхали, помазали лубрикант, так сказать люди со стороны сказали своё первое поверхностное мнение. Итог: очень круто, классно, вкусно и прекрасно скользит! И по стечению обстоятельств туда приехала другая секс блогер Мастер

181🔥51❤‍🔥28🥰8🤬1

31 Jul 2026, 09:44 UTC≈13,600 views707 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Video

Новости про МОЙ лубрикант. Я вчера вернулась очень поздно и решила с утра вам рассказать. Итак - если вы пропустили, уже полгода я мучаю крутой бренд Биомед с и просьбами создать для меня лубрикант с определенным ароматом -аморетто, что оказалось сложной задачей. Сколько бы не было попыток, всё было не так, вроде вот вот, но не то...А вчера был 4й дегустационный раз когда мы пробовали 8 образцов. Создать свой аро

❤‍🔥499135🔥59😢6🎉5👏2🤬1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @nochnajaskazkka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 315,333 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nochnajaskazka - Блог об этом🔞” (@nochnajaskazkka), 52,504 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nochnajaskazkka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.