The Utter Elegance of ECDO Theory If only the crust displaces, where do we derive the anisotropy necessary to substantiate the 175 sudden cataclysm traditions? The crust, oceans, polar ice, etc., are not even 1% of the way to sufficiency in this regard. And if the Earth's architecture involves one integral object with no decoupling potential, how would we ever observe two rotational states to begin with, as the mon…

Channel
nobulart
@nobulart
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
582subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001592578504 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nobulart |
| Created | 18 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nobulart |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 582 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 583 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:20 | 583 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 16 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 25.4%
- avg views ÷ 582 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 148
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (16 May 2026 – 28 July 2026) |
| Views total | 296 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 01:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
What if the most crucial thought an AI considers is the one it doesn’t act on immediately? HUM is an experimental slow-cognition architecture for agents. Unfinished observations, associations, contradictions, and repeated behavioural corrections are captured in a temporary DREAMS layer, not interrupting the current task. A later surfacing process ranks them by recurrence, relevance, provenance, and potential utility;…
Contextual analysis of the past week (and month) of 5+ seismic activity using USGS worldwide data from 1970 until today. Not out of the envelope, but right on the edge of it in some metrics. "The 22-28 June 2026 high-energy week. The week from 22-28 June 2026 contains 32 M5+ events, 5 M6+ events, and 2 M7+ events. Its raw event count is not extreme, ranking only around the 67.7th percentile of weekly windows. Howeve…
Mark any location on the map. If the ring passes the intake criteria, it will be automatically analysed and ranked for morphology, gravity, magnetics and other factors, and assigned a follow-up score. High follow-up's are sites considered most worth exploring for impact/shock signatures. astro.nobulart.com
The Astrobleme Review Atlas provides an interface to explore the project datasets, and to contribute new candidates for review, comparison and ranking using the paper's methodology and results. http://astro.nobulart.com Open-sourced discovery. Live: https://astro.nobulart.com (alpha release - many improvements already in the pipeline) Code: https://github.com/nobulart/astrobleme Draft: https://academia.edu/16903348…
What are those rings? I've been refining the hypothesis from "large circles may be impact relics" into a constraint-first screening framework. The comparison tested my database of arcuate geometry against known/proposed astrobleme catalogues, the Earth Impact Database (EID), diameter distributions, centre proximities, GEBCO source artefact risk (TID), Bouguer and free-air gravity data, magnetic anomaly structure, se…
The Drift The drift is a remarkable stratum of clay, sand, gravel, and far-from-source boulders seemingly flung by some careless hand over the northern portions of Europe and North America. Some of this debris has been moulded into distinctive ridges (moraines), rounded hills (drumlins), and long sinuous ridges (eskers). Any theory of drift formation must account for these singular accumulations as well as an immense…
Richat is not as unique as it is famous.
The Geological History of South Africa “Just as in the case of all other countries, the earliest pages in the Geological Record of South Africa are most fragmentary and utterly confusing; much remains to be done before even the outlines can be reconstructed. It must suffice to remark that at some extremely remote date, possibly more than 1000 million years ago, basic lavas—seemingly the earliest known of the rocks—we…
On the alignments of the Great Pyramid. https://x.com/nobulart/status/2058588266694119478?s=20
Blanchon & Shaw (2015) describe a series of drowned reefs near Barbados, around ~15m, ~50m and ~80m below present sea level. The authors referred to three dated CRE's (Catastrophic Rise Events) during which these reefs were drowned. By comparing the geodetic inverse for these reefs against that of Beebe's drowned beach, and the raised beaches of Shropshire in England, and New Zealand, we can look for path convergence…
Channel photo updated
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @nobulart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 805,637 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“nobulart” (@nobulart), 582 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nobulart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.