Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for «Noble Bandit» — проза, поэзия, познание

Channel

«Noble Bandit» — проза, поэзия, познание

@noble_bandit_group

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

98subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002448740822
TypeChannel
Username@noble_bandit_group
Description#noble_poetry — поэтика. #noble_poems — простые стишки. #noble_prose — проза. #noble_reading — чтения. #noble_writober — писательский челлендж. #noble_mind — творческие размышления. #noble_recommend — личные рекомендации. t.me/noble_bandit — я.
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/noble_bandit_group

Growth

987 August 2026 — 98 subscribers9 August 2026 — 98 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 97–99 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 11:4598no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:0398first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.9%
avg views ÷ 98 subscribers
Avg views / post
60.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 March 20262 August 2026)
Views total182
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
60
Videos
5
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

66 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3045.5%
🔥2131.8%
👾69.09%
❤‍🔥23.03%
👍23.03%
😭23.03%
🥰23.03%
🤣11.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC34 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

”поэт, камень и море” / ПКМ и опять не до сна — ведь никак не достать все мечты — не вылазят из ума, дом фантазий заселили и ждут: ожиданье как жгут по спине бьëт, и раны оставляет так рьяно, что терпеть мочи нет, — так встречаю рассвет. а ответа не видно — вот и годы болидом разгоняют наш шар, затухает пожар внутри душ. у моей же всë иначе, не держит, а кресалом искрит постоянно — как крик заполняет всë пламя, но н

👍2

28 Jul 2026, 20:08 UTC64 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

И вот, у канала наступают тëмные времена... Люди отписываются — и не о том, как классно я пишу, а от канала, вот это да! Ждите к осени перемен. Налажу свои дела и начну делать кое-что новое и реформировать старое. Надеюсь, будет больше диалога с вами, как с моими читателями. Пора.

❤‍🔥1

20 Jul 2026, 21:00 UTC84 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

*** Тащится волей-неволей совесть, И каждый последующий день, как бред, Крутит ошибки, и опять, и во вред — Будто ищет финал свой одинокая повесть. #noble_poems #поэзия #современная_поэзия #стихотворение #стихи #поэт #ПишуСтихи #стих

👾1🔥1

5 Jul 2026, 20:16 UTC112 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

#noble_wordplay Без боли нет... Роста

🔥1

23 Jun 2026, 17:05 UTC146 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Какая из последних работ вышла удачнее?

  1. В январском негативе13%
  2. Ave Maria63%
  3. Урбан25%
  4. Не свобода0%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 May 2026, 17:02 UTC170 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Урбан Небоскрёбы что-то скребут, Хотя в небе — свобода. А город — голодный, Сосëт человечность, судьбу. Горизонт принимает закат, Сценами веки Нарезают его, треки Накладывают. Ходим наугад Годами по твистеру-плитке. Связаны, но чужие — Не монстры, но бежим мы По туннелям от другой калитки Всё в одну калитку. Нитки Ложатся за нами Белые швами: Судьбы не миновать, навскидку. Попытка как пытка, а город — Как сетка.

🔥31

25 May 2026, 19:37 UTC128 viewsread 9 August 2026

Готовьтесь: это будет стих, смыслы которого с первого прочтения вероятно будет не понять, я применил необычайное для себя хитросплетение значений и атмосферы, и ни одно слово, как и прежде, я не употребил — хочется верить! — просто так. Не позднее среды и не раньше вторника я вам его предоставлю. Оно явится так же внезапно, как солнечный удар!

10 May 2026, 17:02 UTC184 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ave Maria Взрывная волна недостойных швыряет прочь — Посланница божья, и с тем — Люцифера дочь, — Ядро за изнанкой души так и манит верных: Друзей ли, рабов ли, попутчиков ли инертных. В тебе течëт божье начало: от чëрта суть Возвысивши, тело подсдало, взметнулась грудь; И пламя вмиг тело объяло, едва касая: И так родилась роковая любовь. Босая Пошла по брусчатке, приковывая глаза К своей сексуально-опасной — сама

👾32🔥1

25 Apr 2026, 19:38 UTC146 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Собиратель. Человек собирает головы. Его окружили карлики — И требуют, требуют: дай нам! Не то отсекут, и маленькой Станет жизнь, а ему — нездорово. Ведь для карликов — сущая тайна: Как собрать он голов столько смог? Только прежде и он тоже был им. Не просил он, к себе был строг — Так, над ними отнюдь не случайно Вырос в том, что им тоже по силам. (#noble_poetry #стихи #стихотворение #поэзия #современная #поэзия

6

17 Apr 2026, 10:37 UTC161 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Зверь. Можешь его даже не убивать, Пусти его, и войдëт в твою жизнь зверь — Хорошо, когда одна голова, Плохо — завтра вырастет две. Их руби, не руби — один чëрт: Эти потуги их не радуют и не злят. Они спокойны, и множатся, ведя отсчёт — И вот, людьми усеяна вся Земля. Ростик, Зомби-поэт (#noble_poetry #стихи #стихотворение #поэзия #современная #поэзия)

5🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @noble_bandit_group. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Jun 2026, 17:05 UTCFinal Results8 voters

Какая из последних работ вышла удачнее?

  1. В январском негативе13%
  2. Ave Maria63%
  3. Урбан25%
  4. Не свобода0%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 625,535 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“«Noble Bandit» — проза, поэзия, познание” (@noble_bandit_group), 98 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/noble_bandit_group.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.