This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,970–1,973 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 19:13
1,970
-2
10 Aug 2026, 06:20
1,972
-1
7 Aug 2026, 11:58
1,973
+1
6 Aug 2026, 20:03
1,972
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.46%
avg views ÷ 1,970 subscribers
Avg views / post
186
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
23 (27 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
4,287
Reactions total
38
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
38 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💔
10
26.3%
👍
9
23.7%
❤
8
21.1%
👏
4
10.5%
😢
3
7.89%
🔥
2
5.26%
👌
1
2.63%
🥰
1
2.63%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
داستانی که خواهد آمد، حکایت معروفی است درباره «حکیم انوری»، شاعر بزرگ قرن ششم هجری. این ماجرا در کتاب «لطائف الطوائف» اثر فخرالدین صفیالدین ارموی نقل شده است.
😡قابل توجه شاعرنماهایی که شعر دیگران را سرقت میکنند(سرقت ادبی) و با نام خود در نوشتهها و کتابها و جدیداً در گروهها مطرح میکنند.
عجب روزگاری شده!
ماجرا از این قرار است:
روزی حکیم انوری در بازار بلخ (شهری در افغانستان امروزی) میگذشت که چشمش به یک مجلس …
عبارت «قوز بالا قوز» یک ضربالمثل فارسی است و دو کاربرد اصلی دارد:
۱. معنای مجازی (اصطلاحی): یعنی مشکلی بر روی مشکل دیگر، یا بدتر شدن اوضاع وقتی که هنوز مشکل قبلی حل نشده، مشکل تازهای هم به آن اضافه میشود. وقتی کسی گرفتاریهای پشت سر هم دارد، میگویند وضعیتش شده «قوز بالا قوز».
۲. معنای واقعی (حسابی): در قدیم که کارهای حسابداری را با چرتکه (قوزک) حساب میکردند، وقتی مبلغی را چند بار پشت سر هم از چرتکه رد میکردند …
💠همچنان روزی حضرت مولانا را حکایت کردند که، فلان الدین نایی(نی زن) در حالت مستی نمانده است(از دنیا رفته است)؛ فرمود:
شُکر که نماند و در آن مستی بِمُرد؛ چه اگر ماندی و هشیار شدی نیک نبودی؛
چنانکه بلبل ِبیچاره در وقت ِگل، برابر ِگل نعرهها میزند و فریادها میکند، چندانی که بیخود میشود ،چه اگر گربه در آن حالت فرصت یابد و آن بلبل ِبیخود را بخورد، آن بلبل ابداً مست بماند و بیخود محشور شود؛
کَمَا تَعِیشُونَ تَمُوتُ…
#اسطوره و نقش آن در شعر استاد عزیز،
#شفیعی_کدکنی . 🌷
🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃🍃
« آبشخور این جهان بینی جادویی را
آن جاها باید جست و جو کرد که ؛
انسان نخستین به وقت راه رفتن، از دیدن سایه به دنبال خود، مبهوت می گریخت
و به هنگام نوشیدن آب، تماشای نقش خویشتن در آینه ی زلال برکه و جویبار ،
حیرت و ترسش را موجب می شد و رویارویی با کابوس پدر و نیاکان مرده ، در عالم رؤیا ، چنان پریشانش می ساخت که نعره زنان
از خواب می پرید و هرسو ،می …
بسم الله النور
به نام درون پرور برون آرای
مرحله ی کشوری دوازدهمین دوره ی جشنواره ی نوجوان خوارزمی
فرایند اجرا و داوری
🍃محور زبان و ادبیات پارسی
با درود و تحیات الهی، در راستای مهر نیک رای یزدان، مرحله ی برگزاری گام نخست (نگارش) و گام سپسین (خوانش) محور زبان و ادبیات پارسی در طی آگهی کشوری شماره ... به گاه ۸ بامداد، به تاریخ ۱۷ امرداد ۱۴۰۵ خورشیدی در ادارات کل استان های ۳۲ گانه ی کشور به دقایق و ظرائف ملاحظات برگز…
پاسخ به سوالات زیر👇👇👆👆
۱ـ تصویر خوانی و تصویر نویسی یکی هستند؟
۲ـ گلستان خوانی و گلستان نویسی یکی هستند؟
خیر، کاملاً یکی نیستند اما به هم مرتبطند و در یک زنجیرهٔ فعالیت قرار میگیرند.
گلستانخوانی(حکایت خوانی):
دانشآموز یک حکایت از گلستان را دریافت یا انتخاب میکند، برای آن عنوانی ادبی و خلاقانه مینویسد؛ جزئیات ذهنی فضا و صحنهٔ حکایت( شکل ها، رنگ ها و خطوط غالب) را توصیف میکند و در پایان پیام حکایت را می نو…
مهربانو اسد:
بسم الله النور
به نام درون پرور برون آرای
جشنوارۀ نوجوان خوارزمی در رشتۀ زبان و ادبیات پارسی در ساحه های (تصویرخوانی، تصویرنویسی)، (گلستان خوانی و گلستان نگاری) در چهار بخش به شرح زیر برگزار می شود:
بخش نخست: تصویرخوانی/ حکایت خوانی (گلستان خوانی)
(بین ۱۳-۷ سطر)
1) برگزیدن عنوان:
ابتدا دانش آموز عنوانی کوتاه، به شکل ترکیبی متناسب با تصویر یا حکایت گلستان، متفاوت، نو، ادبی، بی تکرار و زیبا بر…
جشنواره خوارزمی ، محور تصویر نویسی ، ویژه دبیران :
پرسش:
🤷♂ استاد جعفری عزیز، کلید واژه یعنی چه؟ آیا در انشا هم می توانیم کلید واژه داشته باشیم؟
پاسخ:
🤷♂«کلید واژه » یعنی چه؟
«کلید واژه» یعنی یک یا چند واژهٔ مهم که موضوع اصلی نوشته را نشان می دهند و به خواننده یا داور کمک میکنند بفهمند انشا دربارهٔ چه مفاهیمی است، مثلاً اگر موضوع انشا« نقش خانواده در موفقیت نوجوانان» باشد، کلید واژهها میتوانند اینها باشند:
«خ…
همیشه دوست داشتم فنجانی چای بریزم و آنقدر مشغولِ چیزی باشم که یادم برود برایِ خودم چای ریختهام و سرد شده.
مانندِ حال که تو با لحنِ گیرا و دلربایت برایم شعر میخواندی و من هیچ حواسم نبود که چای ریختم!
میانههایِ خواندن آرام میخندی و نگاهم میکنی.
_چایت سرد شد! بخور.
سرم را تکان میدهم و دستم را از زیرِ چانهام برمیدارم.
به فنجانِ چای نگاه میکنم و میگویم:
_تو اگر باشی، حرام است جز تو محوِ چیزِ دیگر بودن...
میخند…
رفته... هنوز هم نفسم جا نیامدهست
عشق کنار وصل به ماها نیامدهست
معشوق آنچنان که تویی دیده روزگار
عاشق چو من هنوز به دنیا نیامدهست
صدبار وعده کرد که فردا ببینمش
صد سال پیر گشتم و فردا نیامدهست
یک عمر زخم بر جگرم بود و سوختم
یک بار هم برای تماشا نیامدهست
ای مرگ! جام زهر بیاور که خسته ایم
امشب طبیب ما به مداوا نیامدهست
دل خوش به آنم از سر خاکم گذر کنند
گیرم برای فاتحهی ما نیامدهست
قدیما یه تلویزیون سیاه و سفید داشتیم و یه دنیای رنگی.
ما یک تلویزیون سیاهوسفید داشتیم، اما دنیای پشت صفحهاش پر از رنگهای ناب بود. یک دستگاه ۱۴ اینچ توشیبا که برایمان حکم سینما را داشت. هفتهها منتظر یک شب خاص میماندیم؛ شبی که سریال میآمد و زندگی جریان دیگری پیدا میکرد.
در آن روزگار، روستای ما تلویزیون نداشت. جز دو خانواده، ما سومین خانوادهای بودیم که این جعبهی جادویی را به خانه آوردیم. تازه برق هم نداشتیم؛ ب…
❤3👍2
Signed Amo Abbas
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @noavari_parsi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 33,710 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@noavari_parsi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@nojavan_kharazmi named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال نوآوری پارسی متوسطه اول” (@noavari_parsi), 1,970 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/noavari_parsi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
