💸
❤🔥2🔥1
Signed 🧊

Channel
@no_no143
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
99subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002072910404 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @no_no143 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/no_no143 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 99 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 100 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 100 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
159 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5289858627161579589 | 43 | 27.0% | |
| custom 5447397623851931122 | 39 | 24.5% | |
| custom 5323740125216131640 | 23 | 14.5% | |
| custom 5289956651200180770 | 15 | 9.43% | |
| custom 5291979172774700965 | 14 | 8.81% | |
| custom 5325799643638939050 | 14 | 8.81% | |
| custom 5429571160226413448 | 5 | 3.14% | |
| custom 5359766229290602672 | 3 | 1.89% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.26% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.629% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2025 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💸
❤🔥2🔥1
Signed 🧊
Video, posted without a caption
Signed Лео
Video message, posted without a caption
Signed 🫀
Ахуенный Эдит
custom 54473976238519311223custom 53237401252161316401custom 53257996436389390501
Signed 𝑴𝒂𝒓𝒍𝒃𝒐𝒓𝒐 🧊 𝑾𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒏
Video, posted without a caption
custom 54473976238519311223custom 52899566512001807701custom 53257996436389390501
Signed Лео
Video, posted without a caption
custom 52898586271615795895custom 53237401252161316402custom 54473976238519311222
Signed 🫀
🤩
custom 52898586271615795895custom 53597662292906026723custom 54473976238519311223
Signed Лео
❤️🔥
custom 54473976238519311225custom 52898586271615795893custom 52899566512001807703
Signed 🫀
File, posted without a caption
custom 52919791727747009653custom 52898586271615795892custom 54473976238519311222custom 53237401252161316401
Signed 🧊
Video, posted without a caption
custom 52898586271615795895custom 53237401252161316403custom 53257996436389390503
Signed Лео
Сто процентов
Signed Лео
Ух брат
Signed Лео
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @no_no143. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 134,438 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@no_no143 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“حياتي” (@no_no143), 99 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/no_no143.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.