Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NoKempel

Channel

NoKempel

@no_kempel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

45subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001560796987
TypeChannel
Username@no_kempel
Description• Всё и обо всём • Это как личный творческий дневник , но чуточку больше
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/no_kempel

Growth

457 August 2026 — 45 subscribers10 August 2026 — 45 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44–46 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 14:4645no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:2445first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 24 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
56
Videos
2
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 14s
Average length
1m 14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

94 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54159560108188864674750.0%
custom 54135164307400518081516.0%
custom 54137515200699655611111.7%
custom 54133595613545334251010.6%
99.57%
👍11.06%
😁11.06%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2025 to 16 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @no_kempel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 October 2025 to 16 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Dec 2025, 14:25 UTC544 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Конец года ощущается примерно так

9👍1😁1

2 Dec 2025, 17:27 UTC527 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Поймал невероятную искру, когда наткнулся на эту работу с AI. Артефакты, конечно, есть, но качество в плане ретро-эстетики просто идеальное. Не мог не поделиться - работа офигенно крутая.〰️

custom 54159560108188864677custom 54137515200699655612

26 Nov 2025, 20:29 UTC448 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Примерил на себя роль фотографа - ловил на мыльницу ускользающую городскую суету.🙂 Вышло что-то на грани авангарда и случайности.

custom 54159560108188864678custom 54137515200699655613

14 Nov 2025, 14:13 UTC448 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Иногда стоит высказаться, чтобы увидеть реакцию. После моего поста администрация сообщества, что называется, сделала символический реверанс, опубликовав сертификаты. Ошибки в организации это не исправляет, но демонстрирует внимание — а это уже приятно.

custom 54135164307400518089custom 54159560108188864677custom 54137515200699655613

14 Nov 2025, 10:17 UTC333 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

На самом деле, я очень долго думал, стоит ли писать пост, который не несет в себе ни нейтральной, ни положительной динамики (той самой "положительной динамики отрицательного роста" 😂) 🔵Речь пойдет про "АРХТАМГА" В общем и целом, я не смогу рассказать много чего полезного и нового, но основная суть заключается в том, что проводимый конкурс проводился, мягко говоря, абы как. И я говорю это как участник, который по вел

custom 54133595613545334259

4 Nov 2025, 18:16 UTC331 views12 reactions6 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Делюсь солнышком ☀️

custom 541595601081888646712

28 Oct 2025, 14:51 UTC335 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Что такое #Рутгард и почему здесь постоянно появляются репосты оттуда? Рутгард — это мой второй творческий канал, но более камерный, для круга «своих». Здесь вы не встретите моего лица — только наблюдения, мысли и процесс. Если сравнивать с NoKempel: тут — витрина завершённых работ и проектов, а Рутгард — закрытый лайфблог на стыке самоиронии и странной красоты, где важен не результат, а сам путь и все его «бесполез

custom 54135164307400518086custom 54133595613545334251

25 Oct 2025, 17:29 UTC299 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#КОРНИ_ГОВОРЯТ Тонкий намек с ответом "Да"

custom 54159560108188864673

25 Oct 2025, 09:02 UTC296 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

По приглашению одного замечательного человека побывал на выставке "Образы Москвы в русском искусстве из коллекции Государственного Русского музея".💬 Эта экспозиция — панорама Москвы, отражённая в искусстве разных эпох. Более восьмидесяти произведений: от икон Андрея Рублёва до картин Верещагина, Михаила Нестерова, Репина, Делабарта и других мастеров. Через эти полотна видно, как менялся город — от духовной глубины

custom 54159560108188864677custom 54137515200699655613

24 Oct 2025, 18:24 UTC249 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#КОРНИ_ГОВОРЯТ Не забывайте брать с собой уточку

custom 54159560108188864673

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @no_kempel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NoKempel” (@no_kempel), 45 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/no_kempel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.