Channel

ㅤㅤ𝑩.𝑩.ㅤㅤ

@nnnowwe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1003715114506
Type	Channel
Username	@nnnowwe
Description	𝗆𝖾— @Q_Q_what ㅤㅤ(˶˃𐃷˂˶)
Created	16 April 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded	14 August 2026
Last confirmed live	14 August 2026
Measurements held	2
On Telegram	t.me/nnnowwe

Growth

2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
14 Aug 2026, 09:17	1	no change
14 Aug 2026, 01:03	1	first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 16 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Links: 1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Jun 2026, 19:52 UTCAnonymous Poll23 voters

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤWho an i for you?

🎬—friend.4%
🎬—family.13%
♟—former friend.9%
♟—stranger.39%
🎬—fan.13%
🎬—hater/stalker13%
🎬—want to meet someone.9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 29 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 843,072 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

"[🌌]"𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐑𝐋𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓 𝐑𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐄—𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢
@Starlight_Reverie_SR · 571 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

【우】— 🆃𝗔𝗜𝐖𝐈𝐍𝐃.ᵎᵎㅤ𝗣𝗢𝗥𝗧
@M0NDAY_01 · 291 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ㅤㅤ𝑩.𝑩.ㅤㅤ” (@nnnowwe), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nnnowwe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.