Вы бесформенны, но ваше тело — самая близкая форма, благодаря которой вы знаете, что «вы есть». Из-за этой близости вы принимаете это тело за свою форму.
❤46🙏26🔥17❤🔥6👍5🤔1

Channel
@nisargadatta
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,889subscribers
+42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001134757132 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nisargadatta |
| Created | 9 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nisargadatta |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 1,889 | +42 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 1,847 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 1,844 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 1,846 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 1,847 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:26 | 1,847 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 April 2026 – 26 July 2026) |
| Views total | 879 |
| Reactions total | 101 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2,083 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,092 | 52.4% | |
| 🙏 | 428 | 20.5% | |
| 🔥 | 338 | 16.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 134 | 6.43% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 1.49% | |
| 🥰 | 27 | 1.30% | |
| 🤔 | 26 | 1.25% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 0.24% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.048% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.048% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,083reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вы бесформенны, но ваше тело — самая близкая форма, благодаря которой вы знаете, что «вы есть». Из-за этой близости вы принимаете это тело за свою форму.
❤46🙏26🔥17❤🔥6👍5🤔1
В своей «ничтойности» вы совершены, вы целостны, а в своей «знаемости» вы несовершены.
❤46🙏19🔥13❤🔥4
Наше равнодушие к несчастьям наших соседей приводит несчастье и к нашей двери.
❤49🤔19🙏13🔥5👍4❤🔥1🤩1
Оставьте представление о том, что вы есть тело, и задайте себе вопрос: «Кто я?» В этот момент запустится процесс, который вернёт назад реальность или, точнее, вернёт ум в реальность. Только вы не должны бояться. — Чего я могу бояться? Чтобы реальность могла быть, понятия «меня» и «моего» должны уйти. Они уйдут, если вы им позволите. Тогда вернётся ваше естественное состояние, в котором вы не являетесь ни телом, ни ум…
❤66🙏40🔥17❤🔥1👍1
Знать, что вы узник своего ума, что вы живёте в воображаемом мире своего собственного творения, — это проблеск мудрости. Не желать ничего, быть готовым отбросить всё — это решимость. Только такая решимость, порождённая настоящим отчаянием, заставит вас верить мне.
❤76🔥23🙏22❤🔥14🥰2👏1
— Почему вы так настаиваете на отказе от всех желаний и страхов? Разве они не естественны? — Нет. Они целиком созданы умом. Вы должны отбросить всё, чтобы узнать, что ни в чём не нуждаетесь, даже в своём теле. Ваши нужды нереальны, ваши усилия бессмысленны. Вы воображаете, что ваши приобретения защитят вас. На самом деле они делают вас уязвимыми. Осознайте, что вы далеки от всего, что можно обозначить как «это» или «…
❤🔥54❤35🙏26🔥16
К кому это приходит?
❤46🔥9👍7🙏4
Безумие повсеместно, здравомыслие очень редко. И всё же надежда есть, потому что когда мы замечаем наше безумие, мы на пути к здравомыслию. Это функция Гуру — помочь нам увидеть безумие нашей повседневной жизни. Жизнь делает вас сознательными, учитель делает вас осознанными.
❤60🙏27🔥19❤🔥3
Необходимо ухватить главное — то, что вы спроецировали на себя мир своего собственного воображения, основанный на воспоминаниях, желаниях и страхах, и что вы заперли себя в нём. Развейте наваждение и будьте свободны. Как развеять наваждение? Утвердите свою независимость в мыслях и действиях. В конце концов, всё опирается на вашу веру в себя, на убеждение, что то, что вы видите и слышите, думаете и чувствуете, реальн…
❤81🔥29🙏11❤🔥10🎉5
Чтобы выйти за пределы мира, вам нужна внимательная неподвижность, неподвижное внимание.
❤56🙏14🔥11❤🔥3👍3🥰2🤔1
Вы не можете изменить течение событий, но вы можете изменить своё отношение, ведь именно отношение имеет значение, а не само событие. Мир — это притон желаний и страхов. Вы не найдёте в нём покой. Чтобы найти покой, вам надо выйти за пределы мира. Основная причина мира — это любовь к себе. Из-за неё мы ищем удовольствий и избегаем боли
❤67🙏23🔥17👍5🤔2❤🔥1
Вы — Абсолют, а не бодрствующее состояние, ни глубокий сон и не знание «я есть».
❤61🔥15🙏15❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nisargadatta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,169,914 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Шри Нисаргадатта Махарадж” (@nisargadatta), 1,889 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nisargadatta.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.