Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Nina Ai-Artyan

Channel

Nina Ai-Artyan

@nina_aiart

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,020subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001792254075
TypeChannel
Username@nina_aiart
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nina_aiart

Growth

1,0201,0241,0227 August 2026 — 1,024 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,024 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,021 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,020 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,019–1,025 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 22:561,020-1
11 Aug 2026, 11:231,021-3
8 Aug 2026, 00:311,024no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:381,024first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 2 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.9%
avg views ÷ 1,020 subscribers
Avg views / post
315
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held9 (2 June 202630 July 2026)
Views total1,259
Reactions total110
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

250 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15060.0%
🔥4518.0%
👍3012.0%
👏176.80%
❤‍🔥72.80%
🥰10.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 250reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 07:42 UTC249 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

20👍8🔥5❤‍🔥1🥰1

29 Jul 2026, 16:15 UTC267 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

17👍6👏2❤‍🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 11:16 UTC386 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Все чаще думаю о том, что люди любят спорить о проблемах, которых уже не существует. Пока одни до сих пор выясняют, можно ли пользоваться фотошопом, другие уже вообще не расчехляют камеру, а просто генерируют изображения. Мне уже давно занятно наблюдать, как за последние 2-3 года сама точка спора незаметно сместилась. Раньше спрашивали: "Это фотография или обработка?" Сегодня всё чаще приходится задаваться соверше

19👍6👏1

21 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC357 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почитала тут новости из мира ИИ, делюсь с вами выжимкой: OpenAI, кажется опять решила изобрести будущее и решила, что компьютер — это уже прошлый век, и делает устройство вообще без экрана. Скоро, наверное, будем разговаривать с воздухом. Я с детства этого жду! Meta за последнее время: успела выпустить генератор изображений Muse Image, который мог использовать публичные Instagram-аккаунты как референсы, но после к

16👍5🔥2

17 Jul 2026, 15:38 UTC449 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

По возвращении в Москву, в этот раз, я прямо сразу, поняла то, что не могла сформулировать одним словом после прошлых четыех (за 23 года в фотографии) своих поездок в Армению. Ереван — невероятно живописный город. И в этом мне безумно приятно находиться, но никак не получается снять. А Москва это скорее графика. Что мне как графику по сути (я даже маслом пишу "графику") конечно же ближе и проще. Разбираю вот сейча

27🔥15👏2👍1

27 Jun 2026, 12:42 UTC587 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я тут немного пропала т к в путешествии сложно с постами и весь движ сейчас в основном в сториз, на бусти и в риллсах, но вот немного фотографий из Еревана, где я в данный момент нахожусь и немного фотографирую 📷☀️ (на последних двух - просто я) Больше, подробнее и регулярно на boosty : https://boosty.to/nina_aiartyan?share=ios_blog_link

25❤‍🔥5👍4👏3🔥2

12 Jun 2026, 14:05 UTC707 viewsread 8 August 2026

Ребят, у кого ещё сейчас проблемы с запрещенной соцсетью? Меня фб выкинул и обратно не пускает.

7 Jun 2026, 12:17 UTC839 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

УЗЕЛ ВОСПРИЯТИЯ - 29.05.2026 Тут, конечно, трактовки тут могут быть самые разные, вплоть до самых буквальных, но мне было интересно копнуть чуть глубже и увидеть, например, как из сложной системы возникает тот, кто способен видеть/воспринимать мир. Мы создаём среды. Среды создают способы восприятия. А затем внутри них появляются наблюдатели, уверенные, что смотрят на мир самостоятельно. Но они несут в себе все сле

🔥137👏5

2 Jun 2026, 18:11 UTC759 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Неожиданная рифма между старым диптихом и новой картинкой. Вот интересно : мы часто неосознанно выбираем что-то похожее на то что уже выбирали. И мне кажется, тут рифма возникает не на уровне сюжета, а на уровне структуры восприятия. В старом диптихе схема: две огромные массы — природная и искусственная — стоят друг напротив друга как зеркала. Лес(лицо) и дом. Организованная сложность природы и организованная слож

19🔥8👏4

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @nina_aiart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,183,177 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nina Ai-Artyan” (@nina_aiart), 1,020 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nina_aiart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.