Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Nikki Miu國際新聞台

Channel

Nikki Miu國際新聞台

@nikkimiumiunews

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,442subscribers

-358 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001790732836
TypeChannel
Username@nikkimiumiunews
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nikkimiumiunews

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,44213,80013,6216 August 2026 — 13,800 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,795 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,778 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,772 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,764 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,754 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,746 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,735 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,721 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,704 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,701 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,697 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,696 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,683 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,670 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,649 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,639 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,632 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,626 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,613 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,606 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,600 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,581 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,572 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,565 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,556 subscribers6 September 2026 — 13,544 subscribers9 September 2026 — 13,529 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,505 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,489 subscribers15 September 2026 — 13,472 subscribers17 September 2026 — 13,469 subscribers19 September 2026 — 13,442 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net -358. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,388–13,854 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 13:1713,442-27
17 Sept 2026, 00:5913,469-3
15 Sept 2026, 04:3913,472-17
13 Sept 2026, 10:1713,489-16
11 Sept 2026, 16:3613,505-24
9 Sept 2026, 05:3913,529-15
6 Sept 2026, 01:1713,544-12
3 Sept 2026, 21:5813,556-9
2 Sept 2026, 15:5513,565-7
1 Sept 2026, 17:0813,572-9
31 Aug 2026, 15:4713,581-19
30 Aug 2026, 14:2313,600-6
29 Aug 2026, 16:2713,606-7
28 Aug 2026, 14:2313,613-13
27 Aug 2026, 10:5713,626-6
26 Aug 2026, 13:0313,632-7
25 Aug 2026, 15:1313,639-10
24 Aug 2026, 17:2413,649-21
23 Aug 2026, 00:0313,670-13
21 Aug 2026, 11:5613,683first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 27 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

699 reactions across 7 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤔12818.3%
11015.7%
👏7911.3%
👍7310.4%
🙏628.87%
💩557.87%
😨527.44%
😁497.01%
🤩233.29%
🤬192.72%
🔥121.72%
💯71.00%
🍾60.858%
👀50.715%
🤷‍♂50.715%
🤗40.572%
30.429%
🤣30.429%
🥰20.286%
🥱20.286%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 699 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 27 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Mar 2026, 09:19 UTC≈13,600 views201 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#解密UFO #失蹤或死亡科學家一覽 以下是一份神秘失蹤或死亡人員的名單: - 退役空軍少將 William Neil McCasland 威廉·尼爾·麥卡斯蘭,自2026年2月27日起失蹤。 - 航空航太/材料科學家 Monica Reza 莫妮卡·雷扎於 2025 年 6 月 22 日在安吉利斯國家森林遠足 時離奇失蹤。 - 麻省理工學院聚變物理學家 Nuno Loureiro 努諾·洛雷羅,於2025年12月在其家中遭槍殺身亡。 - 加州理工學院天文物理學家 Carl Grillmair 卡爾·格里爾邁爾,於2026年2月16日在其家中遭槍殺身亡。 - Novartis 諾華公司科學家 Jason Thomas 傑森·湯瑪斯於2025年12月失踪,其遺體於2026年3月被發現。 一次可能是巧合,兩次三次就肯定是蓄意的了。

🤔77🙏4633🤬15👍9💯7👀5🤷‍♂5

27 Mar 2026, 09:14 UTC≈9,570 views99 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#解密UFO #共和黨議員揭多名科學家陸續神秘死亡或失蹤 提起 UFO,早前總統 #特朗普 下令由戰爭部長 #赫格塞斯 公開全部 UFO 解密檔案。 而日前,共和黨眾議員 Tim Burchett 添·伯切特揭露多位曾就 #UFO檔案 向國會作證的科學家,陸續離奇身亡或失蹤。 伯切特表示,幕後正發生著某種陰暗的勾當,他甚至鄭重宣佈自己無自殺傾向:「我認識這些科學家和研究人員。他們都曾出席作證。我們必須徹查此事,追究到底。這一切簡直太離譜了,目前發生的事實在太多了。順帶一提,我絕無自殺傾向。」 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15658197/us-scientists-dead-missing-mccasland-reza-albuquerque-california.html https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/

😨52🙏16👍8🔥87🤔5😁2🤬1

27 Mar 2026, 08:49 UTC≈5,670 views93 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#𝕏焦點 #白宮謎之操作 就在大家討論手機和紀念鈔票時,傍晚白宮上傳了一段7秒長的影片,音頻內容含混不清;推民影片聲音倒放後發現,其中竟暗藏著一句「明天日將有重磅發布」。 這種表達方式很 #特朗普,但在美國史上還是首次用最離奇、最精心策劃的總統公告發表方式了。 事實上過去幾日,白宮接連發表了一系列神秘的打格照片、錄音以及已刪除的影片。 據報有人已成功破解了其中部份圖像,各種猜測也隨之甚囂塵上:有人說,白宮應是預告外星人絕密檔案的真相大公開; 亦有人說是為了配合慶祝美國建國250週年,特朗普要在鈔票上簽下大名; 而個人最喜歡的猜想則就是上文提及的那款、暫定售價 500 美元,人稱 T-Phone 的「特朗普黃金手機」。 以老細性格作風,這三件事不會同時發生,就是: 用印有特朗普簽名的鈔票,去買那款預裝了獨家外星人機密檔案的全新特朗普手機。 如今看來,任何離奇的事似乎都有可能發生。

🤔46🤩23😁1110🤣3

27 Mar 2026, 08:47 UTC≈4,570 views82 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#𝕏焦點 #特朗普黃金手機與紀念百元大鈔 入夜後,推民討論的話題,由有總統 #特朗普 頭像的大鈔,轉移到特朗普集團宣佈即將推出、暫定售價 500 元的特朗普金色手機。

👏58😁136🤗4💩1

27 Mar 2026, 08:32 UTC≈3,680 views79 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @MatrixRabbitHole1111

🚨最新消息:#美國 #財政部 稱,為慶祝 #美國 建國250週年, #特朗普 總統的簽名將出現在 #美國 紙幣上。 史詩🇺🇸🇺🇸 斯科特貝森特:“要表彰我們偉大國家和唐納德·J·特朗普總統的歷史性成就,沒有什麼比印有他名字的美元鈔票更有力的了,在建國550週年之際發行這種具有歷史意義的貨幣是再合適不過的了。” https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/2037288613256237225

46👏21🍾63🥰2😁1

27 Mar 2026, 02:03 UTC≈3,870 views73 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#北韓 🇰🇵 #白俄總統訪平壤與金仔互贈禮物 談起 #普京,讓小編想起金仔 #金正恩。 自總統 #特朗普 回歸白宮後,他倒是表現得頗為安份。 據報 #白俄羅斯 總統 #盧卡申科 今日首次訪問 #平壤,與金正恩會晤,兩人舉行峰會及簽署友好合作條約,就教育、保健、產業、農業、情報等10項範疇,加強聯繫。 盧卡申科還與金仔互贈禮物,金仔送了一把佩劍、一個貝殼花樽、以及一枚專門為他鑄造的紀念金幣作為禮物;而盧卡申科則送槍給金仔(看他試槍玩得多開心)。 題外話:左癌想法舉止果然如極權國家,盧卡申科在峰會上暗示美國和以色列「公然無視和違反國際法」,國際法不過廁紙一張,難得左仔和極權國都愛不釋手。 https://www.chosun.com/english/north-korea-en/2026/03/27/LNBGBHK4F5E2DF6XCGSIOGOLMY/

💩54😁115🤬3

27 Mar 2026, 01:44 UTC≈3,560 views72 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#中東局勢 : #伊朗 #有關談判 剛剛友台admin發來幾張截圖,是有人說伊朗從未跟美國談判。 就如剛剛所轉載,總統 #特朗普 今應伊朗請求,暫停攻擊其能源基建; 但同時,也增派多三架昨日才出動過、炸武器庫的 B-1B Lancer 轟炸機。 日前亦有消息稱,伊朗正審視美國提出的停戰計畫,甚至要求美以必須承諾不會再聯手攻擊他們。 那麼很明顯,美伊確實存在談判,但理論上是非正式談判。 前日小編說過,若真要正式談判,理論上要有多國參與 - 包括美國、#以色列 以及周邊國家。 #沙特阿拉伯 王儲已表態,要美國狠狠地出手;其他國家則向美國表達希望提出各自的擔憂。 在國際關係上,正式談判前,涉及戰區的國家多有非正式談判(亦可稱作斡旋、或者「來往走動」),這些非正式談判對各國坐在談判桌前有著商討、準備等促成作用。 所以你可以說無正式談判,但不能說美伊完全「無偈傾」。 真正「無偈傾」要數 #俄烏戰爭,#俄羅斯 完全被孤立,除了

👍56😁113🥱2

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @nikkimiumiunews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

實時現場新聞直播(及 獨家實時消息)
@realtimenewsbroadcasts · 60,003
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 28 August 2026
俄罗斯资讯参考频道
@JShangrong · 24,860
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nikki Miu國際新聞台” (@nikkimiumiunews), 13,442 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nikkimiumiunews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.