Channel
@nikivogt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,134subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001315016117 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nikivogt |
| Created | 9 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nikivogt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 5,134 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 5,131 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 5,135 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 5,138 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:40 | 5,138 | first reading |
31 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (2 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 23,811 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Die AfD will das, was eigentlich der allergrößte Teil der Bürger will. Und immer weniger Leute vertrauen einer Figur, wie Merz. Bislang hat die Nazi-Verleumdungskampagne ja noch viele abgeschreckt. Aber nun trauen sich viele, doch ihr Kreuz bei der AfD zu setzen, weil sie sich nicht mehr allein fühlen in ihrer Sorge und Unzufriedenheit. Und das werden immer mehr werden.
Und nun wollen sie auch noch die 5% Hürde kippen, damit sie die kläglichen Reste der einst wählbaren Parteien irgendwie noch an die Macht hieven können.
Aber jetzt hetzen sie alle gegen die AfD und Wagenknecht, die einzigen Parteien, von denen sich der der Bürger verzweifelt eine Wende erhofft, um die unerträglichen Zustände zu wenden!
Wann hört die CDU auf, mit der „Nazi-Parole“ eine konservative Partei zu diffamieren? Sie selbst hat seit Merkel ihr Wählerpotenzial systematisch belogen und in die Verarmung getrieben. Wie auch die SPD. Und die FDP hat ebenfalls ihre Stammwählerschaft konsequent vergrätzt, genau, wie die SPD.
https://www.msn.com/de-de/nachrichten/other/r%C3%BCckschlag-f%C3%BCr-die-cdu/ar-AA29KGdf?ocid=nl_article_link
Es wird weiter gezündelt … Selensky wird sein Volk noch ins Verderben führen.
https://www.msn.com/de-de/nachrichten/other/elon-musk-verweigert-der-ukraine-die-erlaubnis-starlink-f%C3%BCr-angriffe-auf-russland-zu-nutzen-er-hat-eine-bessere-idee/ar-AA29KDLj?ocid=nl_article_link
Photo, posted without a caption
Das ist mit Abstand das Seltsamste, was wir je veröffentlichen mussten: Im Blut von Menschen blinken Lichter. Dr. Ana Mihalcea untersucht mit einem Mikroskop (4000-fache Vergrößerung) das Blut von Geimpften und Ungeimpften, Lebenden und Verstorbenen – und Sie werden kaum glauben, was sie herausgefunden hat. – Ron Wilson Folge: @FreieEnergieDeutschland ⚡️
https://youtu.be/rSlABxIGlvg
Liebe Freunde und Leser, ich habe nach einiger Zeit einmal wieder Kontakt zu Prof. Dr. Dr. Edinger bekommen. Das freut mich sehr, denn er hat mit seinen Methoden einem mir sehr nahe stehenden Menschen das Leben gerettet. Ich kann mich nun, da ich ja die Mittel habe, wenigstens ein bisschen bedanken, indem ich hier seine hochinteressanten Videos poste. Hier kommt eins:
https://t.me/LachDE/82551
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @nikivogt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 422,924 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Niki Vogt” (@nikivogt), 5,134 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nikivogt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.