6 measurements spanning 17 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,573–1,590 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 20:35
1,575
-4
7 Sept 2026, 13:38
1,579
-3
2 Sept 2026, 23:58
1,582
-3
28 Aug 2026, 10:04
1,585
-3
25 Aug 2026, 13:45
1,588
no change
25 Aug 2026, 13:30
1,588
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
232 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
99
42.7%
💔
36
15.5%
custom 5217734903512196606
22
9.48%
💘
22
9.48%
🔥
14
6.03%
😭
11
4.74%
🕊
8
3.45%
🥰
8
3.45%
😇
7
3.02%
🍓
4
1.72%
👏
1
0.431%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 232 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🙌🏻 Это было хорошо, потому что хорошо было с Вами!
Наши самые любимые и дорогие дети, вот и подошла к концу завершающая 3 смена ДОЛ «Энергетик», а вместе с ней и такое горячо любимое лето в нашем лагере.
Это смена запомнится для каждого из нас своим безграничным уютом, теплом и семейностью.
Этим летом мы старались подарить вам самые яркие эмоции, пробудить улыбку в самых хмурых и окутать нежностью каждого ребёнка.
…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @nikaenergo13. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Новости Саранска и Мордовии @saransk_smi · 50,242 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 25 August 2026
Саранск. Происшествия @saransk_chp · 78,559 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 25 August 2026
Происшествия | Саранск | Мордовия @pro10tvrm · 32,097 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Жизнь в Энергетике” (@nikaenergo13), 1,575 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nikaenergo13.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
