Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 43 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,409–1,432 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 08:16
1,415
+2
14 Sept 2026, 22:59
1,413
+1
6 Sept 2026, 23:58
1,412
-3
2 Sept 2026, 18:07
1,415
-4
30 Aug 2026, 11:57
1,419
-5
27 Aug 2026, 12:43
1,424
-3
18 Aug 2026, 02:32
1,427
-2
8 Aug 2026, 05:35
1,429
+1
7 Aug 2026, 22:03
1,428
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:22
1,428
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 4 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 14s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
279 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
168
60.2%
🔥
65
23.3%
👍
19
6.81%
🙏
11
3.94%
💯
8
2.87%
❤🔥
6
2.15%
🍓
1
0.358%
👏
1
0.358%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 279 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
6.25%
1 of 16 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,040
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
768
over 14 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjdpQYRx
1
14 May 2026
14 May 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2026 to 25 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Заказчик хотел меня кинуть! Вчера выступая, я вспомнила эту историю. И сразу записала на видео.
Смонтировала уже сегодня.
Мораль такова:
Да, мы идем на встречу клиенту. Но всегда ВСЕГДА надо иметь подстраховку и уметь вести юридически грамотно переговоры!
Я иду на мега тренинг к моим любимым юристам Распутиным!
И вам советую👇🏻
Регистрация
Дизайн-конференция едет на Урал!
24 и 25 июля мы проведем наш любимый формат «Лекторий + Практикум + Выезды» в Екатеринбурге, где соберем ведущих дизайнеров Екатеринбурга, Челябинска и Перми. Также вас ждут специальные гости из Москвы и Санкт-Петербурга.
Будет полезно и вдохновляюще!
Ждем вас! Программа и регистрация: https://archdialog.timepad.ru/event/4019397/ . Мест не так много - торопитесь!
Как обещала делюсь с вами шпаргалкой с сегодняшнего выступления.
Давайте вместе будем перестраивать рынок дизайна и комплектации🫶🏻
Опечатки там есть, как обычно: жду ваши находки😅
Через 30 минут начинаем марафон "Портфолио, которое продает". Сегодня теория, а следующая лекция уже будет практика. Кто не успел еще зарегистрироваться, поспешите!
Я тут посмотрела на портфолио дизайнеров…
Так сказать, Ревизию провела😜
И заметила, что у многих проблема вообще не в уровне работ.
А в том, КАК они их показывают.
Хорошие проекты выглядят «не вкусно»
Планировки вообще никто не показывает😏
Классные реализации демонстрируют кусочками.
Клиенту это не понятно и после просмотра он уходит без заявки.
👌Поэтому мы совместно с BasicDecor создали марафон: «Портфолио, кот…
Где дизайнер интерьера теряет деньги на комплектации?
Расскажу вам на выставке-форум «СТРОИТЕЛЬСТВО-2026», которая пройдет 19 по 21 мая в Челябинске.
Разберём:
— где вы реально недозарабатываете
— почему «агентские» не работают так, как кажется
— как выстроить прозрачную и прибыльную модель комплектации и получить доверие заказчика
21 мая 12:30 поделюсь своим опытом и отвечу на ваши вопросы.
Параллельно на выстав…
Новость:
Запуск всех программ в моей школе Авторский надзор переносим на осень.
Мы планировали стартовать 15 апреля, но я так зашиваюсь в работе и домашних делах, что даже не нашла время на минимальное объявление о старте курса тут в блоге🤦🏼♀️
И вот что я поняла, слишком часто я делаю запуски. Не даю себе возможности переключиться и выдохнуть между курсами.
Поэтому приняла решение проводить круг обучений 1 раз в …
Цари дизайна - это дизайнеры с короной на голове.
Но есть действительно короли, а есть подобие из серия «я люблю себя и уважаю»😏
«Любить себя» превращается в задранный нос и фырканье за непоклонение других. А они должны?
Любить себя нужно, но когда вы на стройке, офисе или на собеседовании, надевайте каску, а не корону.
Ибо кирпич прилететь может в любой ситуации. И кто знает, может вам понадобиться помощь от тех,…
❤19🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @nika_soloveva_design. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Design Journal Mamaenko @mamaenkodesign · 29,541 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
Крестная мама дизайна Анна Акопян @annaakopyan · 23,798 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ника Соловьева дизайн бизнес” (@nika_soloveva_design), 1,415 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nika_soloveva_design.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.