Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

небарский

@nik_nebarskay

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,978subscribers

-77 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001526403256
TypeChannel
Username@nik_nebarskay
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nik_nebarskay

Growth

4,9785,0575,017.57 August 2026 — 5,055 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,055 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,057 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,995 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,978 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,966–5,069 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 17:264,978-17
11 Aug 2026, 04:524,995-62
8 Aug 2026, 10:585,057+2
7 Aug 2026, 19:325,055no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:185,055first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.9%
avg views ÷ 4,978 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,040
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held16 (25 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total16,620
Reactions total640
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 30s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

640 reactions across 16 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥21533.6%
12719.8%
💩528.13%
🐳446.88%
💘355.47%
325.00%
💅223.44%
😭203.13%
🍌152.34%
💋101.56%
🍓91.41%
😍71.09%
🌭50.781%
🍾50.781%
💔50.781%
😇50.781%
😈50.781%
😨50.781%
🌚40.625%
🙏40.625%
8 further kinds142.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 640reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 16 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nik_nebarskay. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC704 views26 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Эта бессовестная дрянь продолжает открывать свой рот, то она на Мэйби напала, то сейчас на Анечку. Я не знаю, я полностью солидарен с Хофмой, и кого тут и нужно оттаскать за волосы, то только самку p.s это совершенно омерзительная личность, и она никогда не отмоет свою репутацию

❤‍🔥17💋32🌚1🐳1💘1💩1

10 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC527 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @theohdailyPhoto

💀 «БУДЕТ ОТТАСКАНА ЗА ВОЛОСЫ» — Инстасамка и Аня Хофманнита снова открыли биф из-за несостоявшегося фита. В TikTok начали появляться активные обсуждения о возможной коллаборации Даши с Аней для свежего трека. Как оказалось, некоторые поклонники даже спросили у Хофманниты об этом на одном из её концертов. Аня ответила оскорбительно в адрес Даши, заявив, что считает её «какашкой на своём ботинке». Также она добавила,

💅14💘5😍52❤‍🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC564 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я, конечно, очень сомневаюсь, что вам это поднимет настроение, но вот мой уикенд в стиле village stile

18🍌72❤‍🔥1🍓1🎉1💘1😍1

10 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC509 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥731💘1

10 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC754 views82 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

«Яблоко» сняли с выборов в Госдуму по иску партии «Родина» изменено: «Яблоко», которое не преодолевало барьер в 5% с 2003 года, мать твою, сейчас представляет угрозу, ну это же абсурд, ну мы же все понимаем, что происходит. Я не скажу, что данная партия мне симпатизирует, но тем не менее, всё, что творится в последние месяцы, реально интересно, и то, что произошло сегодня, говорит о многом, я не хочу давать комментар

💩49😭19💔52🗿21🌚1🍌1

8 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC962 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

И куда мы таким составом

❤‍🔥2473🍌1🐳1💘1

8 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC939 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

«Все ради игры» Нора Сакавич. Сразу дам отзыв на всю трилогию, не хочу писать отдельно про «Свиту Короля». Слушайте, я не скажу, что доволен: персонажи посредственные, многие линии не раскрыты, есть сюжетные дыры. Про «Лисью Нору» даже придираться не буду — это вводная книга, окей. Но «Король воронов» и «Свита Короля» совсем не впечатлили. Мне обещали слёзы и грусть — я их не увидел. Особенно горестно из‑за линии Рэ

❤‍🔥10🙏41🍌1💘1

7 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC627 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Так, трилогия «Все ради игры»прочитана, а читать то мне нечего, и вспомнил я значит про хоккейную трилогию Бакмана, хотел скачать в интернете, нет, нигде не могу скачать электронную версию, хотел купить, тоже негде нельзя купить, уже думал обращаться к вам, может у кого есть, но к счастью в вк какой-то мужик в 2024 скинул полную версию, огромное спасибо ему. p.s вообще в букмейте они заблокированы, за что, ну опять ж

❤‍🔥113🐳2🍾1💋1💘1😇1

6 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC774 views27 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Video

Yeah

16❤‍🔥4🍌3🐳2🌭1💘1

2 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC≈1,350 views59 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Все хотят тусить с Молли

❤‍🔥30118😨4🍌1💅1💋1💘1

31 Jul 2026, 19:44 UTC≈1,310 views57 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Неужели завтра обнуление энергий?

❤‍🔥289🍓8💅3🌚2💋21🌭1

31 Jul 2026, 19:42 UTC≈1,230 views56 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Well, I don't really care, I'll write it in English like I'm so mysterious and Cyrillic is not in the trend

❤‍🔥2711💘10💋3🌭2👀1😇1😈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @nik_nebarskay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“небарский” (@nik_nebarskay), 4,978 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nik_nebarskay.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.