Channel
@nicitaro
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
481subscribers
-46 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001607350651 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nicitaro |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nicitaro |
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 22:16 | 481 | -5 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 486 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:01 | 489 | -6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 495 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:29 | 497 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:09 | 499 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 505 | -11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 516 | -11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 527 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 527 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
183 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 71 | 38.8% | |
| 🔥 | 45 | 24.6% | |
| 😍 | 25 | 13.7% | |
| 💋 | 21 | 11.5% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 6.01% | |
| 😈 | 6 | 3.28% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 2.19% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мои солнышки, раздала призы победителям последнего конкурса 🥰🫂❤ (ещë пару дней-недель назад, для фотоотчета руки только дошли 🤣) Купальник в качестве приза не подошëл главной победительнице 🥺 , поэтому я отправила ей материальный приз в виде денег 💕 Хотите, ещë в ближайшие дни устрою конкурс? 🥰❤🫂
💘9🥰4😍4
It's Nicole, bitch! 💥 pinned Deleted message
Когда не остаëтся времени и приходится мыть волосы за 3 минуты в торговом центре: 😂😂😂 P. S Судя по всему звание админа с самым кринжовым контентом в эзосфере присуждается мне... 😂🤡 Успокойте в комментариях, что у кого-то был подобный опыт 😂🙈
💘6😍4🔥2
☀️ОБЩИЙ РАСКЛАД🌸 《Какой главный урок ты должна усвоить до конца этого лета》 Выбери интуитивно карту, к которой тебя больше всего тянет и ставь реакцию 🔮 Ответы после 20+ реакций ❤️ Пиши в комментариях вариант, который ты выбрала)
🔥16💘9😍7
А так, в последние дни у меня внутренний конфликт происходит в душе: с одной стороны мне стыдно и я себя осуждаю (пусть даже не будет судимости, но в деле уже появилось такое пятнышко 🤧), но с другой стороны мне хочется воспринимать сложившую ситуацию жëстким уроком, после которого я смогу начать жизнь с чистого листа и обрету мудрость, больше не наступая на старые грабли (надеюсь, шило в заднице и умение находить пр…
💘8💋3🥰2
Ну что ж скажу, позавчера я съездила в полицейский участок, просидела у них где-то 4-5 часа, всё слëзы выплакала, мне кажется 😂🤧 В ходе всех допросов я признала свою вину (но сотрудники в полиции и адвокат, которого мне дали, сказали, что уголовного и условного срока у меня не будет и дело прекратят по примирению 2х сторон, т.к я первая пришла для сотрудничества, была готова возместить полностью весь ущерб и у меня …
💘7💋3🔥3
Если завтра всë хорошо обойдëтся, клянусь: я начну новую жизнь, брошу пить и обращать внимание на долбаëбов, начну принимать клиенток на расклады и вести стабильно канал 😂❤🫂
💘10🥰4💋3
Таак, девочки, привет 💕 Из шокирующих и интересных новостей в этот ретроградный Меркурий: 1.Я походу рассталась с парнем (ну это неинтересно 🙄😂 мне кажется, он ещё сам вернëтся 😂🤭) 2.Я помирилась с одной подругой, а через пару дней поссорилась и "подралась", она меня оттаскала за волосы, из-за чего я упала на асфальт и получила трешовые ранения на ногах 🗿🤡 урок: никогда не давать шансов токсичным людям из прошлого 🙌…
🔥6💘5👀4
Итоги: @Emmocka1 - купальник @m1_m_s1 - очки @Kiakon - денежный донат @kitty1290 - летний расклад P.s кто не выиграл - не расстраивайтесь, впереди будут ещë конкурсы 🔥Победительницам напишу в течение 2х дней ❤🫂
🔥11😍7💋6
И никакого нет смысла в жизни, кроме любви...❤🫂💫 То чувство, когда взяла сегодня паузу с парнем, а впереди ещë ретро-меркурий (29.06-23.07)... 😈😂 Написать пост и прогноз для каждой в этот ретро-меркурий? ❤
💘13😈6😍3
Всем хорошего дня, любимые ❤🫂 Кто ещë не поучаствовал в конкурсе - участвуйте, завтра уже итоги 🔥
🔥7💋6💘4🥰1
It's Nicole, bitch! 💥 pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @nicitaro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“It's Nicole, bitch! 💥” (@nicitaro), 481 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nicitaro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.