Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for nika ¿

Channel

nika ¿

@nichka_1_pichka

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

102subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001869635260
TypeChannel
Username@nichka_1_pichka
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nichka_1_pichka

Previous handles

@nichka_1_pichka was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@nichka_1_pichka
held 12 August 202612 August 2026

Growth

102103102.512 August 2026 — 103 subscribers12 August 2026 — 103 subscribers25 August 2026 — 102 subscribers12 August 202625 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 14 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 102–103 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 19:47102-1
12 Aug 2026, 01:45103no change
12 Aug 2026, 01:32103first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 31 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

79 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓2227.8%
custom 53033282845519669941822.8%
custom 52332566146722179951721.5%
custom 543852978340104018478.86%
custom 528528890651268562956.33%
🍾56.33%
custom 539800917214498416545.06%
custom 524013762472681398611.27%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 7 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nichka_1_pichka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 December 2025 to 11 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Jul 2026, 19:37 UTC174 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🍓8custom 52401376247268139861custom 52852889065126856291

Signed ника

9 Jul 2026, 19:24 UTC196 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54385297834010401847🍓4custom 52852889065126856294custom 53980091721449841654

Signed ника

6 Feb 2026, 15:56 UTC551 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🍾5custom 52332566146722179955custom 53033282845519669944

Signed ника

31 Dec 2025, 21:19 UTC669 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

с новым годом вас 🤩

custom 53033282845519669948

Signed ника

31 Dec 2025, 06:00 UTC639 views16 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

от выступления на сцене, до тусовки один короткий шаг 📞

custom 523325661467221799512custom 53033282845519669944

Signed ника

31 Dec 2025, 06:00 UTC388 views12 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

пожалуйста, зовите меня на любые катки и в любое время 🙏🏻

🍓10custom 53033282845519669942

Signed ника

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @nichka_1_pichka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“nika ¿” (@nichka_1_pichka), 102 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nichka_1_pichka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.