https://t.me/NiceNews345 更新半天没人看好伤心😭 欢迎各位喜欢看关于金融/科技方面新闻的朋友前来关注一下😃 您的关注是我更新的最大动力😢 简介: 基于对多来源互联网信息的交叉验证🤓 总结并获得客观转述的及时消息报道🫥 感谢各位的支持关注一下吧球球了🥺 会认真更新有价值的新闻🤔 随时聆听读者的建议🥳
👍2❤1
Signed Ming345

Channel
@nicevpn123
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,180subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001353338406 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nicevpn123 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nicevpn123 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 1,180 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:22 | 1,179 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 1,181 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 1,182 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 1,185 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 1,185 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
20 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 9 | 45.0% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 25.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 10.0% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 10.0% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 5.00% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2023 to 4 June 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/NiceNews345 更新半天没人看好伤心😭 欢迎各位喜欢看关于金融/科技方面新闻的朋友前来关注一下😃 您的关注是我更新的最大动力😢 简介: 基于对多来源互联网信息的交叉验证🤓 总结并获得客观转述的及时消息报道🫥 感谢各位的支持关注一下吧球球了🥺 会认真更新有价值的新闻🤔 随时聆听读者的建议🥳
👍2❤1
Signed Ming345
这样通过交叉验证而获得的新闻你们觉得怎么样(本频道打算转型更新新闻)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Ming345
2023年5月就业报告突破经济学家预期,呈现出罕见的就业趋势 据来自多个消息来源的报道,2023年5月份的就业报告引起了广泛关注,并让经济学家们感到惊讶。根据美国劳工部发布的数据,这一就业报告显示,就业人数大幅增加,失业率显著下降。 根据报道,就业人数在5月份增加了大约20万人,远超经济学家的预期。失业率从4.2%降至3.8%,达到了近年来的最低水平。这一就业报告被认为是自巴拉克·奥巴马执政时期以来最罕见的就业趋势之一。尽管这一就业报告令人鼓舞,但仍有专家指出,数字背后可能存在某种特殊情况。美国劳工部在推特上发布的信息显示,他们正在进一步调查报告中的数据。 2023年5月份的就业报告给经济学家们带来了惊喜。这一报告显示出了一个罕见的就业趋势,但专家们仍在努力解释其背后的原因和影响。 参考文章: - "May Jobs Report Shocks Economists: The Strangest Employment Rep…
Signed Ming345
某毒出品,必属“精品”
Signed Ming345
Channel name was changed to «Nice Net(移步新频道!)»
此频道即将停更,请移步新频道: https://t.me/niceethernet
Signed Ming345
NASA 公布重返月球的宇航员名单 NASA 公布了参与阿尔忒弥斯 2 号任务的四名宇航员名单:美国宇航员 Reid Wiseman(指挥官)、Victor Glover(飞行员)和 Christina Hammock Koch(任务专家),加拿大宇航员 Jeremy Hansen(任务专家)。他们将成为自 1972 年阿波罗 17 号任务以来首批重返月球的人类。阿尔忒弥斯任务始于 2017 年,2022 年 11 月发射了阿尔忒弥斯 1 号登月火箭,这次任务主要是测试,没有载人。阿尔忒弥斯 2 号最早将在 2025 年 12 月发射,主要是绕月飞行,并不会登陆。 NASA
Signed Ming345
Video, posted without a caption
👍1
Signed Ming345
https://t.me/niceethernet 请各位移步新频道,本频道将于不久的将来弃用
👍1
Signed Ming345
https://t.me/niceethernet 请各位移步新频道,本频道将于不久的将来弃用
Signed Ming345
https://t.me/niceethernet 请各位移步新频道,本频道将于不久的将来弃用
Signed Ming345
https://t.me/niceethernet 请各位移步新频道,本频道将于不久的将来弃用
❤1😢1
Signed Ming345
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nicevpn123. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
这样通过交叉验证而获得的新闻你们觉得怎么样(本频道打算转型更新新闻)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2023 to 4 June 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@nicevpn123 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nice Net(移步新频道!)” (@nicevpn123), 1,180 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nicevpn123.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.