Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 欣欣朋友圈

Channel

欣欣朋友圈

@nhrdhurdvja

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,357subscribers

+162 since we began measuring on 12 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003640246009
TypeChannel
Username@nhrdhurdvja
Created3 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 September 2026
Last confirmed live28 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nhrdhurdvja

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1951,3571,27612 September 2026 — 1,195 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,228 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,279 subscribers28 September 2026 — 1,357 subscribers12 September 202628 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +162. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,171–1,381 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 02:411,357+78
18 Sept 2026, 17:201,279+51
14 Sept 2026, 03:371,228+33
12 Sept 2026, 17:221,195first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 3 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.73%
avg views ÷ 1,357 subscribers
Avg views / post
77.8
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 September 2026
Posts held13 (3 September 2026 – 12 September 2026)
Views total856
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Sept 2026, 17:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
47s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 3 September 2026 to 12 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Sept 2026, 15:08 UTC38 viewsread 12 September 2026
Photo

再接一课就下课啦,明天下午1-30开课,头课还在,过来不需要人接,不需要手机号码,直接电报联系或者电报语音指引怎么上来。不是中介,本人自做自聊。

8 Sept 2026, 03:07 UTC80 views1 reactionsread 12 September 2026
Video

就在这一秒, 至少50000人在亲嘴, 也有100000人在拥抱, 而你,在我这里快活❤ 开课中

❤1

7 Sept 2026, 09:43 UTC74 viewsread 12 September 2026

【综合评价分】: 9.8 【身材形象分】: 9.5 【服务态度分】: 10 【情绪价值分】: 10 ————————— 【学生留名】: 匿名 【验证时间】: 9-7 【老师艺名】:欣欣 【上课花费】:600p 【服务内容】:课表一致 ————————— 【出击课程体验描述】:提前约好老师第二天头课,醒来发现老师在线,就问能否提前,得到同意后于是起床洗漱后出发,12就到了。课室不错楼层很高,私密性很好。进门后看到穿着连衣裙,皮肤白白的,老师递了一瓶水,休息会就一起洗澡去了。接下来就进入环节了,课表服务都有,有什么要求老师也不会拒绝,态度挺好。本想大战三百回合,奈何今天状态不佳,于是很快结束了这次出行。

5 Sept 2026, 11:59 UTC73 viewsread 12 September 2026

艺名:欣欣 年龄:21岁 🐻:大B 身高:165cm 体重:50kg。 特色:自聊初下海,口活都说好、无纹身、女友感、态度超级好 课程内容: 鸳鸯浴、水中箫、深喉、🉑69 丝袜、制服、毒龙、舌吻、激情爱爱(口臭不亲亲哦) 课费: 600P(40分钟) 1100PP(90分钟) 包时1600(三小时限5次) 包夜:2200 不限次数,12个小时 ⚠️太大或桩机提前沟通,初下海脆皮求放过,受不了会拒接喔🥹 首次约支付宝口令留位。 🈲无套 🈲嗑药 🈲素质差 PS:个人自聊无中介

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @nhrdhurdvja. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“欣欣朋友圈” (@nhrdhurdvja), 1,357 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nhrdhurdvja.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.