Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for "NKMK" AJ - АО "НГМК"

Channel

"NKMK" AJ - АО "НГМК"

@ngmkofficial

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

41,422subscribers

+426 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001447215009
TypeChannel
Username@ngmkofficial
Description"Navoiy KMK" AJ - АО "Навоийский ГМК" Ishonch telefoni: +998 79 227-72-22 210100, Navoiy sh., Navoiy k., 27-uy [email protected] www.ngmk.uz www.facebook.com/nkmkofficial www.instagram.com/nkmk.official www.youtube.com/nkmkofficial x.com/jsc_nmmc
Created4 April 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ngmkofficial

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 11 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@navoiy_hokimligi/15285711 Sept 2026, 09:13 UTC@ngmkofficial/37511 · this entry11 Sept 2026, 09:18 UTC1.005 minutes
@navoiy_hokimligi/15567512 Oct 2026, 06:25 UTC@ngmkofficial/37846 · this entry12 Oct 2026, 09:51 UTC1.003.4 hours
@navoiy_hokimligi/15567612 Oct 2026, 06:25 UTC@ngmkofficial/37847 · this entry12 Oct 2026, 09:51 UTC1.003.4 hours
@alisher_sadullaev/591029 Sept 2026, 12:37 UTC@ngmkofficial/37747 · this entry29 Sept 2026, 12:38 UTC0.9872 seconds
@ngmkofficial/37742 · this entry29 Sept 2026, 11:45 UTC@alisher_sadullaev/590529 Sept 2026, 11:48 UTC0.973 minutes
@ngmkofficial/37750 · this entry29 Sept 2026, 13:13 UTC@alisher_sadullaev/591729 Sept 2026, 13:15 UTC0.9772 seconds
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@navoiy_hokimligi10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0059 minutes@navoiy_hokimligi (7–3)
@alisher_sadullaev5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.973 minutes@alisher_sadullaev (3–2)
@qiziltepa_hokimligi9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0014 minutes@qiziltepa_hokimligi (7–2)
@toshkentv_xtb16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0022 minuteseven
@TGminwater14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0020 minutesthis entry (11–3)
@joqargikenes9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0019 minutes@joqargikenes (8–1)
@iivuz11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0037 minutes@iivuz (11–0)
@cyberpolice_iiv29 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0020 hours@cyberpolice_iiv (29–0)
@surviib5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0059 minutesthis entry (4–1)
@poytaxt_uz8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0025 minutesthis entry (5–3)
@QResMinistrlerKenesi11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0022 minutes@QResMinistrlerKenesi (6–5)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 343 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

40,63141,42241,026.56 August 202612 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 99 days, net +426. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,512–41,541 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 20:4741,422+220
10 Nov 2026, 16:4541,202+1
9 Nov 2026, 04:1041,201-2
7 Nov 2026, 20:3841,203+1
6 Nov 2026, 15:1541,202+26
5 Nov 2026, 14:2441,176+144
4 Nov 2026, 14:0641,032+8
3 Nov 2026, 15:0941,024-17
2 Nov 2026, 16:2741,041-18
1 Nov 2026, 15:4941,059-21
31 Oct 2026, 18:3941,080-21
30 Oct 2026, 20:0741,101-36
29 Oct 2026, 17:4641,137-22
28 Oct 2026, 16:5641,159-9
27 Oct 2026, 20:2041,168+71
26 Oct 2026, 23:2741,097-13
25 Oct 2026, 23:2941,110-25
24 Oct 2026, 22:0641,135-2
23 Oct 2026, 22:5441,137-33
22 Oct 2026, 19:1941,170first reading

Engagement

555 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 194 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.7%
avg views ÷ 41,422 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,830
147 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
149
of 555 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026
Posts held555 (3 August 2026 – 15 November 2026)
Views total1,444,670
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 10:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈33,300
Videos
≈1,970
Links
≈11,800

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 52m
Average length
2m 03s

Measured directly from 84 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 21 of 149 posts held from the last 30 days (14.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

15 Nov 2026, 04:23 UTC≈5,170 viewsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @navcyber_102Photo

🖼#foto_lavha #KibermadaniyatOyligi2026 #Kiberxavfsizlik #Navoiy 🇺🇿Navoiy viloyati IIB Kiberjinoyatlarga qarshi kurashish boshqarmasi hamda Markaziy bank Navoiy viloyati bosh boshqarmasi mas’ul xodimlari tomonidan "NKMK Navoiy mashinasozlik zavodi" xodimlari kibermadaniyatini yuksaltirish, ularni zamonaviy kiberxavflardan ogoh etish hamda kiberjinoyatlarning oldini olishga qaratilgan o‘quv-mashg‘uloti tashkil etildi.…

14 Nov 2026, 08:33 UTC≈8,550 viewsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @ndktu_rasmiyPhoto

#Ziyolilar_kengaşi Bir guruh ziyolilar Navoiy viloyati hokimi “Faxriy yorliği” bilan taqdirlandi 13-14 noyabr kunlari Navoiy viloyatida “Yangi Özbekiston ziyolilari – milliy yuksaliş tayançi” şiori ostida ilk bor “Özbekiston ziyolilari kengaşi” tadbiri bölib ötmoqda. Xususan, Navoiy davlat konçilik va texnologiyalar universitetida viloyat ziyolilari iştirokida amaliy muloqot taşkil etildi. Unda Navoiy viloyati hok…

14 Nov 2026, 06:28 UTC≈7,180 viewsread 14 November 2026
File

“KONÇILAR HAYOTI” GAZETASINING 2026-YIL 14-NOYABRDAGI 21-SONINI ÖQING 📢 Aziz döstlar! ✉️ Eʼtiboringizga “Konçilar hayoti” gazetasining 2026-yil 14-noyabrdagi 21-sonini PDF şaklida havola etamiz. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ЧИТАЙТЕ ВЫПУСК ГАЗЕТЫ «КОНЧИЛАР ҲАЁТИ» №21 ОТ 14 НОЯБРЯ 2026 ГОДА 📢 Дорогие друзья! ✉️ Представляем вашему вниманию PDF вариант выпуска газеты «Кончилар ҳаёти» №21 от 14 ноября 2026 года. K…

13 Nov 2026, 15:43 UTC≈8,630 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Prezident Shavkat Mirziyoyev 2027-yil uchun Davlat budjetining maqsadli koʻrsatkichlari, asosiy makroiqtisodiy prognozlar hamda budjet-soliq siyosatining ustuvor yoʻnalishlari yuzasidan yigʻilish oʻtkazdi. — Президент Шавкат Мирзиёев провел совещание по обсуждению целевых показателей Государственного бюджета, основных макроэкономических прогнозов и приоритетных направлений бюджетно-налоговой политики на 2027 год. #M…

13 Nov 2026, 06:17 UTC≈31,800 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#VAKANSIYA “NKMK” AJ Markaziy kon boşqarmasi Jihozlarni ta’mirlaş böyiça navbatçi çilangar kasbi böyicha oçiq tanlov eʼlon qiladi ➡️ BATAFSIL Tanlovda iştirok etiş uçun nomzodlar hujjatlarni mehnat.ngmk.uz sayti orqali topşirişlari lozim. Ma’lumot uçun: 79-577-28-30, 79-577-03-96 Manzil: Zarafşon şahri, “NKMK” AJ Markaziy kon boşqarmasi Kanalga ulaniş: 👇👇👇 https://t.me/ngmkofficial 👍 Sayt 👍 Telegram 👍Facebook 👍 …

13 Nov 2026, 03:16 UTC≈11,200 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#KibermadaniyatOyligi2026 ⚠️ «12 соат ичида текширувдан ўтинг» — сохта Telegram хабарларига алданманг! Фирибгарлар аккаунтингиздан чиқарилишингиз билан қўрқитиб, «Центр верификации» тугмаси орқали сохта сайтга йўналтирмоқда. ❌ Тугмани босманг, кириш коди ва паролингизни берманг — аккаунтингизни қўлга киритишлари мумкин! 🛡 Шошилманг, хабарни текширинг ва яқинларингизни огоҳлантиринг! 📱Telegram | 📱Youtube |📱Instagra…

Showing the 12 most recent of 555 posts we hold for @ngmkofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ngmkofficial edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
27 October 2026
Most recent edit
27 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @ngmkofficial as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
21 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
21 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
26 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“"NKMK" AJ - АО "НГМК"” (@ngmkofficial), 41,422 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ngmkofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.