Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Gift Tore

Channel

Gift Tore

@nfttore

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

9,920subscribers

+469 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001342349643
TypeChannel
Username@nfttore
DescriptionStay up to date with us! Owner @arbabc
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held45
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/nfttore

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Coins4Hub/106938 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC@nfttore/15358 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC1.002.6 hours
@Coins4Hub/1073917 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC@nfttore/15817 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC1.0019 hours
@Coins4Hub/1074017 Aug 2026, 21:54 UTC@nfttore/15818 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC1.0011 hours
@Coins4Hub/1078826 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC@nfttore/16075 · this entry26 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC0.9969 minutes
@Coins4Hub/1077123 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC@nfttore/16015 · this entry23 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC0.952.8 hours
@Coins4Hub/1077023 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC@nfttore/16007 · this entry23 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC0.922.2 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Coins4Hub6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.982.7 hours@Coins4Hub (6–0)
@AMOAirdrop6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.972.2 hours@AMOAirdrop (6–0)
@starsboxxx5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.97under a minute@starsboxxx (4–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 16 of the 16 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 115 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

6,69410,6968,6956 August 2026 — 9,451 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,451 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,434 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,539 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,527 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,520 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,648 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,420 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,342 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,293 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,232 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,156 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,126 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,092 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,027 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,994 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,931 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,952 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,865 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,745 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,546 subscribers25 September 2026 — 9,022 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,994 subscribers10 October 2026 — 7,478 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,301 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,063 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,694 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,696 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,619 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,584 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,534 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,494 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,456 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,431 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,355 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,307 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,280 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,250 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,241 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,206 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,149 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,115 subscribers7 November 2026 — 10,049 subscribers9 November 2026 — 10,005 subscribers11 November 2026 — 9,920 subscribers9,9206 August 202611 November 2026
45 measurements spanning 96 days, net +469. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,094–11,296 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 45
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 01:009,920-85
9 Nov 2026, 08:3810,005-44
7 Nov 2026, 21:1510,049-66
6 Nov 2026, 16:1510,115-34
5 Nov 2026, 14:2510,149-57
4 Nov 2026, 11:2810,206-35
3 Nov 2026, 14:5610,241-9
2 Nov 2026, 14:1610,250-30
1 Nov 2026, 11:0610,280-27
31 Oct 2026, 14:2710,307-48
30 Oct 2026, 15:1610,355-76
29 Oct 2026, 18:0810,431-25
28 Oct 2026, 17:4010,456-38
27 Oct 2026, 17:1710,494-40
26 Oct 2026, 15:2610,534-50
25 Oct 2026, 17:1610,584-35
24 Oct 2026, 20:2910,619-77
23 Oct 2026, 18:0010,696+4,002
20 Oct 2026, 19:306,694-369
17 Oct 2026, 13:167,063first reading

Engagement

428 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.03%
avg views ÷ 9,920 subscribers
Avg views / post
202
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 428 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held428 (6 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total7,863
Reactions total368
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 23:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,370
Videos
≈146
Links
≈926

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 07s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,974 reactions across 419 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣2,40748.4%
❤66113.3%
💔3376.78%
👍1753.52%
🔥1142.29%
🫡1122.25%
🤝1092.19%
❤‍🔥981.97%
😈921.85%
😢791.59%
👎701.41%
😭651.31%
👏641.29%
💋501.01%
💯480.965%
😁450.905%
😎440.885%
💘420.844%
🤷420.844%
😡390.784%
15 further kinds2815.65%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 419 of the 428 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,974 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 428 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3,169
across the posts below
Posts paid on
42
of 426 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1,390
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nfttore. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 428 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 39 posts held from the last 30 days (15.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 21:06 UTC55 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

طرف اومده GTA رو تو ایران دانلود کنه اینقد سرعت اینترنتش خفن بوده که ۸۶ سال دیگه دانلود میشه :))) ❤️❤️❤️❤️

🤣6🗿1😭1

Signed ꘜ 𝙔𝘼𝙎𝙄𝙉 𝙏𝙊𝙍𝙀

11 Nov 2026, 17:53 UTC99 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

وقتی جلوی تراپیست شوخی می کنی اما اون به جای خندیدن نت برداری میکنه : ❤️❤️❤️❤️

🤣5👏1💩1

11 Nov 2026, 13:36 UTC143 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

پست چدید پاول بیش از ۱ میلیون کیف پول Gram غیرامانی (Self-Custodial) در تلگرام، تنها طی ۴۸ ساعت گذشته فعال شده‌اند. 🥇 ارز دیجیتال Gram امروز در میان ۱۰۰ ارز برتر بازار از نظر ارزش بازار، بیشترین رشد قیمت را داشته و طی ۲۴ ساعت گذشته ۱۴٪ افزایش قیمت را تجربه کرده است ❤️❤️❤️❤️

🤣3🍌1👏1😢1

Signed ꘜ 𝙔𝘼𝙎𝙄𝙉 𝙏𝙊𝙍𝙀

10 Nov 2026, 22:02 UTC162 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

بارون روی شکوهِ ۲۵۰۰ ساله ایران 👑 ❤️-@nfttore

🫡4❤‍🔥3❤1

Signed ꘜ 𝙔𝘼𝙎𝙄𝙉 𝙏𝙊𝙍𝙀

10 Nov 2026, 20:53 UTC176 views9 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

پست پاول دوروف: 🔴 بازار ارزهای دیجیتال با افت شدیدی روبرو است. 🟢 تنها ارز دیجیتال "گرام" افزایش قیمت داشته است: +7%. 🌐 من تعجب نکرده‌ام. این تنها ارز دیجیتالی است که در یک اکوسیستم اجتماعی واقعی ادغام شده است. 💎 با وجود این، قیمت آن هنوز به طرز مضحکی پایین است و باید در 3 ارز برتر سایت CoinMarketCap قرار داشته باشد. یک روز به آن جایگاه خواهد رسید. ❤️❤️❤️❤️

🤣4🍌2🫡2❤1

Signed ꘜ 𝙔𝘼𝙎𝙄𝙉 𝙏𝙊𝙍𝙀

10 Nov 2026, 20:51 UTC149 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026

احساس میکنم بعد این پستش قراره یه پامپ بده تا فردا اینا فعلان درحال بالا بالا رفتنه 🤪

🍌2👍1👏1

Signed ꘜ 𝙔𝘼𝙎𝙄𝙉 𝙏𝙊𝙍𝙀

10 Nov 2026, 20:45 UTC149 views9 reactionsread 11 November 2026

چرا میخندی ایرانی

🍌5💔3😎1

Signed ꘜ 𝙔𝘼𝙎𝙄𝙉 𝙏𝙊𝙍𝙀

10 Nov 2026, 15:03 UTC189 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🆒اگه تو 24 ساعت گذشته داخل ربات اپیک +5 gram دپوزیت داشتین و لول ایرون به بالا هستید پرومو کد زیر رو بزنید و باکس فریشو باز کنید. Code: DUALITY ورود به اپیک ❤️❤️❤️❤️

🤣5👏2👍1

10 Nov 2026, 14:50 UTC177 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026

پست جدید پاول دوروف: قیمت تون هم که به یه ورشه ❤️❤️❤️❤️

🤣4🤝2

10 Nov 2026, 11:00 UTC206 views10 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

پشماتون بریزه؛ یه دختر توییت زده : یه دوستِ اهوازی دارم که به دعانویسی شدیدا اعتقاد داره، رفته پیش دعانویس و اونم گفته باید باهام سکس کنی تا با مایع منی خودم برات دعای قوی بنویسم. یکیم زیرش نوشته : بابای من دعانویس بود، اکثر مراجع کننده‌هاش دخترای دانشجو بودن، بابامم می‌گرفت به بهونه دعا اونارو میکرد، به نظرم کسی که به این چیزا اعتقاد داره حقشه بکننش. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ❤️-@nfttore

🤣7🗿2😐1

Signed ꘜ 𝙔𝘼𝙎𝙄𝙉 𝙏𝙊𝙍𝙀

10 Nov 2026, 10:58 UTC187 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026

رفتیم برا پامپ دیگه 👋

🤣5👍2

Signed ꘜ 𝙔𝘼𝙎𝙄𝙉 𝙏𝙊𝙍𝙀

9 Nov 2026, 18:24 UTC209 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

شاید باورتون نشه ولی افرادی که واسه دوستاشون کباب ترکی میخرن تا 20% بیشتر شانس عمر طولانی رو دارن ❤️❤️❤️❤️

🤣8🍌2👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 428 posts we hold for @nfttore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@nfttore edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @nfttore as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
24 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTCAnonymous Poll32 voters

از ما راضی هستید

  1. بله صدرصد75%
  2. صدرصد47%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 428 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gift Tore” (@nfttore), 9,920 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nfttore.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.