Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NFT.RU

Channel

NFT.RU

@nftru

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,700subscribers

-418 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001800177007
TypeChannel
Username@nftru
DescriptionNFT.RU — Достаточно, чтобы не потеряться в цепочке блоков. Все ссылки: https://linktr.ee/nftru По всем вопросам: @nftruadmin
CreatedBetween 1 July 2022 and 31 August 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/nftru

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,6727,5577,114.55 August 2026 — 7,118 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,118 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,112 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,091 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,073 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,060 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,049 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,022 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,004 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,974 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,926 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,870 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,844 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,826 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,806 subscribers27 September 2026 — 6,762 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,730 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,687 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,672 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,557 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,289 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,049 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,025 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,763 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,742 subscribers6 November 2026 — 6,723 subscribers9 November 2026 — 6,700 subscribers6,7005 August 20269 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 96 days, net -418. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,539–7,690 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 15:356,700-23
6 Nov 2026, 04:586,723-19
2 Nov 2026, 17:476,742-21
30 Oct 2026, 16:276,763-262
27 Oct 2026, 17:197,025-24
25 Oct 2026, 03:277,049-240
21 Oct 2026, 22:167,289-268
18 Oct 2026, 07:587,557+885
15 Oct 2026, 01:406,672-15
11 Oct 2026, 15:546,687-43
5 Oct 2026, 09:216,730-32
27 Sept 2026, 01:366,762-44
18 Sept 2026, 04:016,806-20
14 Sept 2026, 03:016,826-18
10 Sept 2026, 07:566,844-26
5 Sept 2026, 01:206,870-56
1 Sept 2026, 05:136,926-48
29 Aug 2026, 11:486,974-30
26 Aug 2026, 14:147,004-18
23 Aug 2026, 06:147,022first reading

Engagement

194 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.95%
avg views ÷ 6,700 subscribers
Avg views / post
332
74 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.966%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
74
of 194 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 72 of 74 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held194 (4 August 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total24,553
Reactions total230
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 15:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,930
Videos
≈493
Links
≈4,230

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 54s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

514 reactions across 174 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤27954.3%
👍9017.5%
😁499.53%
🔥326.23%
👏244.67%
😱183.50%
🤔183.50%
🥴30.584%
😡10.195%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 190 of the 194 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 558 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 194 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 194 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nftru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 194 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 9 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 74 posts held from the last 30 days (2.70%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 14:04 UTC111 views4 reactionsread 9 November 2026

📈 NEAR обсуждает новую модель использования комиссий NEAR Intents По черновому предложению, часть комиссий хотят направлять в краткосрочные гособлигации США, а полученную доходность использовать для инвестиций в стартапы экосистемы. Прибыль от успешных инвестиций затем смогут направлять либо на выкуп $NEAR с рынка, либо на выплаты стейкерам и участникам управления.

👍3❤1

9 Nov 2026, 12:54 UTC185 views4 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

🪙 Binance Alpha проведет компенсационный дроп на $350 000 Получить награду смогут пользователи, у которых на 6 ноября 2026 года было минимум 200 Alpha Points. Баллы списывать не будут, клеймить тоже ничего не нужно. Награды автоматически зачислят на аккаунт. Сроки распределения объявят позже.

❤3😁1

9 Nov 2026, 11:44 UTC215 views2 reactionsread 9 November 2026

❌ Keplr сообщил о несанкционированных транзакциях у части пользователей, которые создавали кошелек через вход Google или Apple Проблема связана с сервисом Web3Auth, который Keplr использовал для таких аккаунтов. Вход через Google и Apple временно отключили, а пользователям рекомендовали не отправлять новые средства на затронутые кошельки и не пытаться их заново импортировать. По первоначальной оценке Keplr, кошельк…

❤1👍1

9 Nov 2026, 10:38 UTC263 views2 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

🪙 Ликвиднуло лонг ETH на $118 млн Китяра держал позицию на 56 667 $ETH. После дампа рынка его сбрило, общий убыток $44,78 млн. Еще 30 октября он сокращал лонг с 93 184 $ETH до 56 667 $ETH, пытаясь отодвинуть ликвидацию, но этого не хватило.

❤1👍1

9 Nov 2026, 09:10 UTC269 views5 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

🍀 Два соло-майнера Bitcoin заработали по $230 000 На выходных два независимых майнера нашли блоки Bitcoin с разницей менее семи часов. Каждый получил более $230 000 в виде награды за блок. Оба использовали сервис CKPool, позволяющий майнить самостоятельно и не делить вознаграждение с другими участниками.

❤3👏1🔥1

9 Nov 2026, 07:55 UTC261 views3 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

🚨 Минфин США ввёл санкции против восьми канадских OTC-брокеров В санкционный список попали восемь канадских внебиржевых криптоброкеров, включая Nia Nations (NNCE) и Million Exchange (MillionEX). По словам ZachXBT, это произошло спустя пять месяцев после того, как он публично призвал власти обратить внимание на канадских OTC-брокеров, связанных с Ираном и используемых незаконными структурами. ZachXBT назвал Канаду …

❤2🔥1

9 Nov 2026, 06:20 UTC271 views4 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

✅ Binance закроет часть аккаунтов в Европе 31 декабря Binance уведомила пользователей из Франции, Испании, Италии и Польши, что закроет их аккаунты из-за отсутствия необходимой лицензии MiCA для работы в ЕС. С 29 ноября биржа начнёт ежемесячно списывать плату за хранение оставшейся криптовалюты: 0,025% от баланса, но минимум 10 USDC. Если на счёте меньше этой суммы, Binance может списать весь остаток. Пользователя…

👍2❤1😱1

9 Nov 2026, 05:07 UTC300 views3 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

😭 Криптовалютчиков наказывают за измену главы Nvidia Глава Nvidia Дженсен Хуанг признался в измене жене на фоне сообщений о его связи с женщиной, которую американские власти подозревают в работе на китайскую разведку. Совет Nvidia начал независимое расследование, а акции компании во ОТС просели примерно на 3,4%. Крипта решила по шумок, как верный друг технологических акций, тоже сложится. За 24 часа 1B+ ликвидаций.…

😁2❤1

8 Nov 2026, 16:47 UTC304 views3 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

📰 Криптодайджест недели: взломы на сотни миллионов, санкции против MEXC и расследование бизнеса Трампа ▪️ Crédit Mutuel Arkéa потерял более $133 млн в результате взлома Первым ZachXBT сообщил о краже средств у французского банка. ▪️ КНДР отвергла обвинения во взломе Binance на $6,3 млрд Сестра Ким Чен Ына назвала обвинения США политической провокацией. ▪️ Mercado Bitcoin взломали на $40+ млн С крупнейшей бразильск…

❤1👍1🤔1

8 Nov 2026, 16:10 UTC323 views2 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

📈 Wintermute заработала уже $222 млн на Hyperliquid за все время Сейчас у маркетмейкера открыто позиций на $125,9 млн, из них $115,8 млн приходится на шорты. За последние 30 дней прибыль составила $18,8 млн, еще $3,46 млн остаются нереализованными. Крупнейшие шорты открыты по $ETH, $BTC, $HYPE и $SOL.

❤1👍1

8 Nov 2026, 13:44 UTC369 views3 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

Клянусь, так и было

😁3

8 Nov 2026, 11:42 UTC432 views2 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

🔍 Хакер открыл противоположные позиции по BTC и ETH на Hyperliquid Новый кошелек получил 3 100 $ETH через Tornado Cash, продал их примерно за $6,92 млн $USDC и внес средства на Hyperliquid. После этого он открыл лонг на 169,47 $BTC на $12,84 млн и шорт на 5 740 $ETH на $12,83 млн, обе позиции с плечом 20x. P.S. Средства, поступающие на новый кошелек из Tornado Cash, автоматически размечаются как краденные. 100% ве…

❤1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 194 posts we hold for @nftru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Belgee Russia
@belgee_russia · 113,317
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NFT.RU” (@nftru), 6,700 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nftru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.