Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for N F T O N

Channel

N F T O N

@nftpriton

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,849subscribers

-48 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002137584782
TypeChannel
Username@nftpriton
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 29 March 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nftpriton

Growth

2,8492,8972,8737 August 2026 — 2,897 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,897 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,895 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,885 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,880 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,872 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,866 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,858 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,853 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,849 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 22 days, net -48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,842–2,904 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 11:142,849-4
26 Aug 2026, 14:582,853-5
23 Aug 2026, 22:462,858-8
20 Aug 2026, 11:212,866-6
17 Aug 2026, 20:572,872-8
14 Aug 2026, 20:152,880-5
11 Aug 2026, 05:422,885-10
8 Aug 2026, 01:182,895-2
7 Aug 2026, 13:322,897no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:302,897first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

268 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7226.9%
🤣6022.4%
💯3914.6%
🤔3312.3%
💩3011.2%
😱124.48%
😢103.73%
🖕72.61%
🤡51.87%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 268reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2024 to 28 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Mar 2026, 17:49 UTC171 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Нихао, друзья! Такие дела, Тон умер в моих интересах окончательно. Я поглядывал... но нет. Поэтому буду херить канал: уж если Тон в смятку, то в NFT - вообще голяк. Но мне нравилось вести его, нравилось наблюдать как формируется комьюнити. Мы взлетали до 30к! Правда, две трети ботов) А еще, позавчера я завел личный блог. Выбрал идеальное время - аккурат под блокировку. Шарю за тайминги. Я поступил в универ в Кита

4

18 Aug 2025, 14:35 UTC930 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

а че там...есть кто живой?)

  1. живой31%
  2. мертрвый20%
  3. иди нахуй50%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

💩10🤣9🖕7🤡2

10 Jun 2024, 11:20 UTC≈4,330 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Есть еще одна причина по которой я решил не ссылаться на первоисточник - они отредактировали ответ! А именно момент, где я написал что GG дерьмовый.

🤣9💯2💩1

10 Jun 2024, 11:17 UTC≈4,150 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

1. Расскажи о своей коллекции На канале NFTON я часто подшучивал над приторно доброй коллекцией The Dino. Шутка вышла из под контроля и в противовес появились BlyaDino’s. Каждый Блядинос собран вручную под заказ, где за основу берется Дино и дорабатывается. Это уникальный феномен, на других блокчейнах такого нет. 2. Почему ты пришел на блокчейн TON? Уютное снг-комьюнити с привязкой к ТГ. Именно то, что все проходи

💯84💩3

10 Jun 2024, 11:14 UTC≈2,720 viewsread 7 August 2026

Дак вот! Анкета состоит всего из 7 вопросов где только 1 про Блядиносов. Я думал сослаться на нее изначально, но заметил что там нет линков. На вопрос “почему” - ответили, что не хотят делать рекламу. Это так забавно слышать в контексте интервью. Я вижу в этом неуважение к читателям, которые читают о коллекции или персоне, но не могут перейти посмотреть о ком/чем речь. А по этому, я просто опубликую вопросы ниже:

10 Jun 2024, 11:12 UTC≈3,060 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вощем, написал мне парень с предложением взять интервью для их канала посвященного NFT на тон. Забегая вперед отмечу, что это больше смахивает на барбисайз анкету. Но вернемся к этому потом. А чего вообще у меня брать интервью? Начну из далека: Помните полу-дохлую коллекцию The Dino? Выкатили они как то стикерпак, приторно добрый как и сами уебки Дино. И один участник нашего уютно чата, чисто в прикол, стал регулярн

5🤔2😱1

30 Apr 2024, 06:15 UTC≈4,360 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В общем получилось как то поровну. Даже не знаю зачем он вам в туалете...

🤣13💩3🤡31🤔1

29 Apr 2024, 14:58 UTC≈4,110 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Повесили бы такого КимЧенЫна?

  1. наверное нет22%
  2. точно нет39%
  3. только в сортире39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤣8

29 Apr 2024, 14:55 UTC≈3,470 viewsread 7 August 2026

Меня похуесосили в личку за нечестное голосование, и вот честное:

29 Apr 2024, 14:48 UTC≈3,350 viewsread 7 August 2026

Я знал что у меня аудитория с хорошим вкусом. Никто не выбрал повесить КимЧенЫна на стену. Но отсылка качественная и сразу считывается.

29 Apr 2024, 10:03 UTC≈3,280 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Повесили бы такое дома?

  1. нет49%
  2. нет51%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤣6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nftpriton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Aug 2025, 14:35 UTCAnonymous Poll117 voters

а че там...есть кто живой?)

  1. живой31%
  2. мертрвый20%
  3. иди нахуй50%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Apr 2024, 14:58 UTCAnonymous Poll175 voters

Повесили бы такого КимЧенЫна?

  1. наверное нет22%
  2. точно нет39%
  3. только в сортире39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Apr 2024, 10:03 UTCAnonymous Poll185 voters

Повесили бы такое дома?

  1. нет49%
  2. нет51%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2024 to 28 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“N F T O N” (@nftpriton), 2,849 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nftpriton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.