Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

NFT Боец 3.0

@nftboec

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

20,595subscribers

-441 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002678687569
TypeChannel
Username@nftboec
DescriptionРозыгрыши,аналитика,трейдинг. А что еще надо?Добро пожаловать в логово NFT Бойца 👩‍🦽 Для связи и предложений : @AdenIzLogova По разбанам: @anna_kovr @marina_gromovaa @erikalfod @D0BR0V Чат: @logovoboica_official Остальные названия фейк 🤡
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nftboec

Growth

20,59521,03620,815.56 August 2026 — 21,036 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,036 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,727 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,733 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,697 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,663 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,631 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,595 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -441. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,529–21,102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:1920,595-36
12 Aug 2026, 02:4320,631-32
11 Aug 2026, 04:0420,663-34
10 Aug 2026, 00:3020,697-36
9 Aug 2026, 02:5520,733+6
8 Aug 2026, 00:2020,727-309
6 Aug 2026, 23:1521,036no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:0321,036first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.48%
avg views ÷ 20,595 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,540
53 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 53 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held55 (3 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total81,646
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,740
Videos
231
Links
2,640

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 53 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nftboec. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 55 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC436 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Небольшой скетч по рынку 💂‍♀️ Из того,что вижу я,грам готовится пробивать очередное дно,если ничего предпринимать не будут,вот прям возможно даже сегодня/завтра дроп монеты до 1.2 ,ноо за все время,а это примерно 4 раза,когда грам пробивал 1.2 был откат вверх,да и новости про то,что кто-то там чето вывел с фонда какие-то бабки,возможно пойдут на удержании цены или хз куда,мне в принципе похуй. Нр факт есть факт,ско

12 Aug 2026, 20:28 UTC≈1,350 viewsread 13 August 2026

Сча бесплатные билеты на бандитычей в чате от Глеба будут

12 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC≈1,250 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @sl_bhrp

🎡 Колесо Фортуны #305 🏆 (на несколько призов) 🎁 Призы (5): 🏅 Место #1: Сладкий персик — t.me/nft/PreciousPeach-2870 🏅 Место #2: Пенсил — t.me/nft/FinePen-23854 🏅 Место #3: Пенсил — t.me/nft/FinePen-24809 🏅 Место #4: Пенсил — t.me/nft/FinePen-20337 🏅 Место #5: Пенсил — t.me/nft/FinePen-3723 ⏰ До: 13.08.2026, 16:40:43 💰 Билет: 10 Stars / 0.1037 TON 🎫 Билетов: 384 👇 Нажмите чтобы купить билет и участвовать!

11 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC≈1,430 viewsread 13 August 2026

🎡 Колесо фортуны #54 🏆 (на несколько призов) 🎁 Призы (3): 🏅 Место #1: https://t.me/nft/LibertyFigure-20827 🏅 Место #2: https://t.me/nft/LibertyFigure-178790 🏅 Место #3: https://t.me/nft/LibertyFigure-47344 🎫 Билет: 1 монет ⏰ Длительность: 120 мин. Оплата с баланса (/daily). Билетов — сколько хватит монет.

11 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC≈1,390 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Брат Каин выиграл сумку,пэйман забрал 2 гифта.Планеты вставли в ряд сегодня?💂‍♀️

11 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC≈1,400 viewsread 13 August 2026

🎡 Колесо фортуны 🎁 Приз: https://t.me/nft/MoodPack-145447 🎫 Билет: 50 монет ⏰ Длительность: 180 мин. Оплата с баланса (/daily). Билетов — сколько хватит монет.

11 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,410 viewsread 13 August 2026

🎡 Колесо Фортуны #306 завершено! 🏆 Победители: 🏅 Место #1: ꧁💖p҈a҈y҈m҈a҈n҈💔꧂ — 🎁 https://t.me/nft/FinePen-3498 (1) (билет #114) 🏅 Место #2: Максим — 🎁 https://t.me/nft/SurgeBoard-27595 (2) (билет #296) 🏅 Место #3: ꧁💖p҈a҈y҈m҈a҈n҈💔꧂ — 🎁 https://t.me/nft/SurgeBoard-24314 (3) (билет #239) 🏅 Место #4: FFF — 🎁 https://t.me/nft/SurgeBoard-18386 (4) (билет #127) 👏 Поздравляем!

10 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC≈1,630 viewsread 13 August 2026

🎡 Колесо фортуны 🎁 Приз: https://t.me/nft/LibertyFigure-239331 🎫 Билет: 1 монет ⏰ Длительность: 30 мин. Оплата с баланса (/daily). Билетов — сколько хватит монет.

10 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 13 August 2026

🎡 Колесо фортуны 🎁 Приз: https://t.me/nft/LibertyFigure-50357 🎫 Билет: 1 монет ⏰ Длительность: 39 мин. Оплата с баланса (/daily). Билетов — сколько хватит монет.

10 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 13 August 2026

🎡 Колесо фортуны 🎁 Приз: https://t.me/nft/SurgeBoard-20634 🎫 Билет: 1 монет ⏰ Длительность: 30 мин. Оплата с баланса (/daily). Билетов — сколько хватит монет.

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @nftboec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@nftboec edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 81,684 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NFT Боец 3.0” (@nftboec), 20,595 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nftboec.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.