Channel
@nft_gifts_zone
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,518subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001680442294 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nft_gifts_zone |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nft_gifts_zone |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:29 | 1,518 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 1,521 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 1,525 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:22 | 1,527 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 1,530 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 1,534 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 1,534 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 1,535 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 15 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 October 2025 to 7 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👜 Спустя почти месяц показатели аренды стабилизировались на 1000 аренд в день. Общий объём аренды всего лишь 50 000 TON, из которого половина Plush Pepe, а средняя окупаемость пепы 8 лет👍 Инвестим в пеп?
Юзернейм @devil продали за 555.555 ТОН (1.24млн$) ЭТО 101млн РУБЛЕЙ!
Минус фигурка Дурова🎁 Продавец попался на скамера, решил не оставлять ему подарок, удалил аккаунт🙂
🎁 13 ФИГУРОК ДУРОВА ЗА $32 000 Себестоимость 13-ти фигурок $8 000, чистая прибыль составила х4 — $24 000 за 9 дней🫣
Ребята разработали концепт функции GiftTeleport, позволяющей передавать подарки с телефона на телефон как по эирдропу! Удобно, особенно для мошенников, которые пришли к работяге отжимать его подарки 🥸
🚀 Bitcoin ракета за пару дней взлетела с 35 TON до 140 TON каждый мог…
Полный сет Паши Дурова И во все это одеть🎁
Аренда юзов и номеров уже на Tonnel
😢 АРЕНДА — ВСЁ 🎁Минимальная цена аренды Plush Pepe теперь стоит 3.4❤️/24ч Окупаемость самой обычной Pepe за 6 000❤️ составляет 1 764 дней или почти 5 лет Кто за это ответит?
🗑Навсегда удалённые Durov’s Cap! 1. Durov's Cap #443 2. Durov's Cap #512 3. Durov's Cap #785 4. Durov's Cap #1015 5. Durov's Cap #1031 6. Durov's Cap #1287 7. Durov's Cap #1377 8. Durov's Cap #1480 9. Durov's Cap #1536 10. Durov's Cap #1586 11. Durov's Cap #1975 12. Durov's Cap #2106 13. Durov's Cap #2609 14. Durov's Cap #2658 15. Durov's Cap #2669 16. Durov's Cap #2743 17. Durov's Cap #2778 18. Durov's Cap #2844 19…
❤1😢1
Binance испытывает серьезный отток средств Пользователи вывели $21 ярд за неделю и $4 ярда только за последние сутки. Это рекорд в истории крипторынка. Ваучеры в 0.26$ не помогли удержать китов…(
🏆 Portals пробил $100 000 000 торгового объема Сегодня Portals пробил первые $100M торгового оборота всего за 5 месяцев с момента открытия, что делает его абсолютным лидером среди NFT маркетов на блокчейне TON!
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @nft_gifts_zone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@nft_gifts_zone named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NFTGifts Hub” (@nft_gifts_zone), 1,518 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nft_gifts_zone.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.