Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 1nfka

Channel

1nfka

@nfka_twitch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

19subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002065342917
TypeChannel
Username@nfka_twitch
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nfka_twitch

Growth

192220.57 August 2026 — 22 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19–22 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 03:5419-1
15 Aug 2026, 20:3520-2
11 Aug 2026, 13:1522no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:5322first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 22 September 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

52 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3669.2%
🔥713.5%
👏47.69%
🤝35.77%
💊11.92%
🕊11.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 September 2024 to 7 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 15 we hold a reading for · 53%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nfka_twitch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 September 2024 to 7 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Dec 2025, 13:43 UTC139 views2 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Poll

Какой сет собрать?

  1. 125%
  2. 28%
  3. 325%
  4. 425%
  5. Свой вариант в коментах17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2

7 Dec 2025, 13:43 UTC133 views2 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

Нужна ваша помощь.Не могу,понять,какой сет больше нравится😢

2

20 Nov 2025, 08:51 UTC117 views5 reactions3 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

C последнего поста прошло ровно 15 дней, возникает вопрос: куда я пропал? После поста о челлендже я зарядился энергией и думал, что всё пойдёт по плану, который выстроился в голове, но я инста словил лузстрик на 200 эло и спустился до пересечения 7 и 8 уровня. После такого неудачного старта у меня всё-таки получилось вернуться к значению, с которого начинал данный челлендж. Дальше пошла череда побед — я два раза был

3🔥2

5 Nov 2025, 13:30 UTC93 views3 reactions2 Starsread 11 August 2026
Video

Я промолчу по поводу игры спирит. Очень надеюсь на победу монголов👀

3

5 Nov 2025, 09:07 UTC85 views4 reactions2 Starsread 11 August 2026

Тему казахов даже не стал затрагивать — на это можно записать отдельный подкаст на час❌

4

5 Nov 2025, 09:01 UTC84 views4 reactions4 Starsread 11 August 2026

Хочу затронуть тему фасика и того, что на нем сейчас происходит. Конечно, эту тему мусолили уже все, кому не лень, но лично мне как-то всё равно. Мой первый матч на фасике был еще в далеком 2019 году. С тех пор вышла кс2, платформа претерпела множество изменений, но подбор матчей остался примерно таким же. До сих пор не понимаю, как некоторые игроки в соло набирают по 3-3500 ELO всего за 300 матчей при винрейте в 80

4

4 Nov 2025, 21:40 UTC66 views4 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

Назревает жесткий конфликт по поводу эло, поэтому начинается челлендж. Цель: до 6 декабря апнуть 2500-2700 эло. В случае проеба разыграем какой-нибудь скин. На данный момент челлендж начинается с отметки в 1831 эло👹

3🕊1

4 Nov 2025, 19:00 UTC60 views3 reactions2 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Турик на фейсите официально можно считать выебаным😘

3

29 Oct 2025, 18:55 UTC65 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Камбек😘❤️‍🔥 https://www.twitch.tv/1nfka

2

22 Mar 2025, 18:04 UTC126 viewsread 11 August 2026

Написал тикет на разбан, надеюсь снимут🙏

22 Mar 2025, 18:03 UTC121 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Салют, родные, сегодня походу не будет стрима по кс. Решил побегать в соло перед стримом, по итогу имеем лузы, так еще и бан на сутки непонятно за что.🙄

21 Mar 2025, 22:09 UTC97 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Отправил скины,кто через баллы взял(Не было нужной рарности вещей,отправил наклейками в +).Проверяйте трейд офферы♥️

2👏2🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @nfka_twitch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Dec 2025, 13:43 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

Какой сет собрать?

  1. 125%
  2. 28%
  3. 325%
  4. 425%
  5. Свой вариант в коментах17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 September 2024 to 7 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“1nfka” (@nfka_twitch), 19 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nfka_twitch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.