Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Синица В Руках - Прогнозы На Футбол

Channel

Синица В Руках - Прогнозы На Футбол

@nezhuravl

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,428subscribers

+160 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001319281444
TypeChannel
Username@nezhuravl
DescriptionТолько разумное отношение к азартным играм @razumazart Ссылка на МАХ - https://max.ru/join/lo85z-7LWaXryEDnCF7Xgxfk9rhxXIofNJdIhjQVy_Y Менеджер - @sinichka_manager (по вопросам рекламы и сотрудничества)
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/nezhuravl

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

11,11411,51011,3127 August 2026 — 11,268 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,268 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,265 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,250 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,231 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,232 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,237 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,220 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,206 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,190 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,183 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,181 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,184 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,181 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,177 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,178 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,177 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,178 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,167 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,156 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,149 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,135 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,145 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,132 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,129 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,119 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,114 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,126 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,195 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,204 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,187 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,212 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,205 subscribers25 September 2026 — 11,219 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,233 subscribers8 October 2026 — 11,236 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,230 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,337 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,363 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,354 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,346 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,372 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,510 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,506 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,496 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,493 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,498 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,482 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,467 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,462 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,456 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,459 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,454 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,441 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,418 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,430 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,426 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,428 subscribers11,4287 August 20266 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 91 days, net +160. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,055–11,569 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 10:4911,428+2
5 Nov 2026, 11:3711,426-4
4 Nov 2026, 09:4111,430+12
3 Nov 2026, 07:5011,418-23
2 Nov 2026, 04:4911,441-13
1 Nov 2026, 04:3011,454-5
31 Oct 2026, 06:0811,459+3
30 Oct 2026, 04:1011,456-6
29 Oct 2026, 05:4811,462-5
28 Oct 2026, 01:1511,467-15
26 Oct 2026, 23:1411,482-16
26 Oct 2026, 02:4411,498+5
25 Oct 2026, 03:5911,493-3
24 Oct 2026, 01:4711,496-10
23 Oct 2026, 00:4611,506-4
22 Oct 2026, 01:3911,510+138
20 Oct 2026, 17:4111,372+26
18 Oct 2026, 17:4411,346-8
16 Oct 2026, 20:2711,354-9
15 Oct 2026, 18:1011,363first reading

Engagement

169 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.0%
avg views ÷ 11,428 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,080
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 169 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held169 (2 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total86,340
Reactions total2,670
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 08:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈9,590
Videos
≈109
Links
≈2,620

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

7,769 reactions across 166 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2,21028.4%
🤝1,63721.1%
❤1,32117.0%
👍86211.1%
👏6628.52%
🏆3053.93%
🍾2122.73%
👨‍💻1962.52%
💯1361.75%
🕊1211.56%
😎801.03%
🎉270.348%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 167 of the 169 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,769 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 169 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 169 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nezhuravl. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 169 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (7.14%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 16:56 UTC≈1,580 views260 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026

Посмотрели новый ролик на ютубе ? Готовлю для вас новые 🙌 Давайте наберём 50+ комментариев и 200+ лайков Нужна мотивация и ваша поддержка ✊

❤175🔥47🍾22🤝14🏆1😎1

5 Nov 2026, 20:00 UTC≈2,410 views105 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Почему же фавориты проигрывают? Ответ на этот вопрос вы можете узнать из моего нового ролика

👍57❤30🔥12🤝6

5 Nov 2026, 13:24 UTC≈2,770 views40 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Poll

Прогноз на матч Аталанта - Кайрат

  1. Аталанта - Фора(-2)38%
  2. Кайрат - Фора(+3)14%
  3. Тотал больше 3.57%
  4. Тотал меньше 48%
  5. Обе забьют - да13%
  6. Обе забьют - нет7%
  7. Затрудняюсь ответить12%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👏33🍾5❤2

5 Nov 2026, 05:36 UTC≈2,890 views129 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026
Photo

Доброе утро ☀️ Каждое утро на следующий день после матчей Лиги Чемпионов - для нас действительно доброе 😉 ведь в карманах денег немного больше, чем было днём ранее 💰 Не даром это шестой год самый успешный мой турнир с точки зрения профита 🤑 Реал наиграл 3,39xG, а АЕК забил 2 гола с 0,79xG. Тут 200% попадание в результат матча исходя из прогнозируемых ожиданий, несмотря на итоговый счет и время забитых голов. Комо…

🏆72🔥31❤9👏9💯5🤝3

4 Nov 2026, 14:33 UTC≈3,050 views122 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Полуставка Дня Сегодня рассматривал всю линию ЛЧ. Если вчера было 5 ставок дня, все ординарами, и 4/5 зашло, то сегодня сложнее. Смотрел Лейпциг - Сити, пришел к 2,5 больше, но кэфа нет, за 1,3 брать бред даже в двойник. Викинги с Сабах думал ТБ, но и там кэфа нет. Вообще ожидаю минимальную победу викингов в 1-2 гола, ну это так, интуитивно. Не прям тот варик, куда стоит рисковать деньгами. В общем АЕК для Реала в…

🔥69👏15🏆10🤝10❤9👍6🕊2🍾1

4 Nov 2026, 12:13 UTC≈2,940 views43 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Poll

Прогноз на матч Лейпциг - Манчестер Сити

  1. Лейпциг - Фора(+1.5)7%
  2. Манчестер Сити - Победа51%
  3. Тотал больше 313%
  4. Тотал меньше 43%
  5. Обе забьют - да17%
  6. Обе забьют - нет1%
  7. Затрудняюсь ответить8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👏36👍5🍾2

4 Nov 2026, 08:26 UTC≈3,030 views154 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026
Photo

Поздравляю всех с продолжением побед 🥳 ЛАСК мне очень нравится, не скрою, смотреть их футбол - одно удовольствие. А вчера совместили приятное с полезным - еще и денег нам принесли 💰 Таких ребят мы смело забираем на Ставку Дня на повышенную сумму, приятно когда профит в 2 раза больше ✅✅😎😎 Сегодня продолжим работу 🤝

🔥102🤝25❤22🍾5

3 Nov 2026, 16:14 UTC≈3,200 views303 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026
Photo

1/4 Ставок Дня на сегодня Всем желаю удачи 🏆 Ставку сделал тут - https://dbbt1.me/rQpADtX Наберём 500+ реакций для лайва и доп прогнозов ?)

❤186🔥56🤝23👍20👏11🕊3🍾2🎉2

3 Nov 2026, 09:26 UTC≈3,220 views52 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Poll

Прогноз на матч Атлетико Мадрид - Бавария

  1. Атлетико Мадрид - Непроигрыш21%
  2. Бавария - Фора(0)27%
  3. Тотал больше 37%
  4. Тотал меньше 3.57%
  5. Обе забьют - да30%
  6. Обе забьют - нет1%
  7. Затрудняюсь ответить6%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🏆25👨‍💻15🤝6🍾4👏2

2 Nov 2026, 15:04 UTC≈3,250 views116 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026

Вся статистика должна быть честной и 100% открытой. Октябрь оказался первым минусовым месяцем в этом году. Все из-за микромоментов. Где-то в Ставку Дня из 5 анализов матчей подобрал именно тот, который не зашел. Где-то не хватило одной ЖК или одного углового/гола. Неприятненько, конечно, но не критично. Можно было бы взгрустнуть, но здравый рассудок не позволяет. 90% людей закрывают минусом почти каждый месяц, а у н…

👍72🤝21🏆9❤8👏5💯1

2 Nov 2026, 14:49 UTC≈2,850 views49 reactionsread 7 November 2026

000 ❌ (смол маркет) Экспресс из 2-х |кф 2.1 +110.000 ✅ (смол маркет) Экспресс из 2-х |кф 2.5 +150.000 ✅ (смол маркет) Ординар |кф 1.76 +76.000 ✅ (смол маркет) Ставка дня |кф 1.82 +164.000 ✅ (Ашкан) Ставка дня |кф 1.799 -200.000 ❌ (Ашкан) Ординар |кф 1.65 +97.500 ✅ (Ашкан) Ординар |кф 1.72 +72.000 ✅ (биг маркет) Ординар |кф 1.76 -100.000 …

🤝25🕊8👨‍💻6👍3💯3🔥3❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 169 posts we hold for @nezhuravl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @nezhuravl as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
10 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
19 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Nov 2026, 13:24 UTCAnonymous Poll1,140 voters approx.

Прогноз на матч Аталанта - Кайрат

  1. Аталанта - Фора(-2)38%
  2. Кайрат - Фора(+3)14%
  3. Тотал больше 3.57%
  4. Тотал меньше 48%
  5. Обе забьют - да13%
  6. Обе забьют - нет7%
  7. Затрудняюсь ответить12%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Nov 2026, 12:13 UTCAnonymous Poll846 voters

Прогноз на матч Лейпциг - Манчестер Сити

  1. Лейпциг - Фора(+1.5)7%
  2. Манчестер Сити - Победа51%
  3. Тотал больше 313%
  4. Тотал меньше 43%
  5. Обе забьют - да17%
  6. Обе забьют - нет1%
  7. Затрудняюсь ответить8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Nov 2026, 09:26 UTCAnonymous Poll1,300 voters approx.

Прогноз на матч Атлетико Мадрид - Бавария

  1. Атлетико Мадрид - Непроигрыш21%
  2. Бавария - Фора(0)27%
  3. Тотал больше 37%
  4. Тотал меньше 3.57%
  5. Обе забьют - да30%
  6. Обе забьют - нет1%
  7. Затрудняюсь ответить6%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTCAnonymous Poll708 voters

Прогноз на матч Арсенал - Манчестер Сити

  1. Арсенал - Непроигрыш25%
  2. Манчестер Сити - Непроигрыш13%
  3. Тотал больше 214%
  4. Тотал меньше 38%
  5. Обе забьют - да30%
  6. Обе забьют - нет2%
  7. Затрудняюсь ответить8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTCAnonymous Poll752 voters

Прогноз на матч ПСЖ - Астон Вилла

  1. ПСЖ - Фора(-1)26%
  2. Астон Вилла - Фора(+1.5)9%
  3. Тотал больше 2.518%
  4. Тотал меньше 37%
  5. Обе забьют - да29%
  6. Обе забьют - нет2%
  7. Затрудняюсь ответить8%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 169 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Александр Панов | Прогнозы и ставки на футбол
@a_panov77 · 20,814
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 30 September 2026
ОЛЕГ СОЛОВЬЕВ | ВЕЩИЙ | ПРОГНОЗЫ И СТАВКИ НА ФУТБОЛ
@solovyev_project · 42,540
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 September 2026
ШАПКА СТАВКА ПРОГНОЗЫ НА ФУТБОЛ
@ShapkaStavka · 21,120
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Синица В Руках - Прогнозы На Футбол” (@nezhuravl), 11,428 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nezhuravl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.