Channel
@neyasli
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,604subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001255267309 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @neyasli |
| Created | 10 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/neyasli |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 2,604 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 2,601 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:42 | 2,599 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 2,601 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 2,601 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 July 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,018 |
| Reactions total | 814 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
958 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5213274008744632782 | 485 | 50.6% | |
| 💔 | 149 | 15.6% | |
| 🤣 | 137 | 14.3% | |
| 🦄 | 87 | 9.08% | |
| 🙈 | 58 | 6.05% | |
| 💅 | 26 | 2.71% | |
| 🗿 | 16 | 1.67% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 958reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @neyasli. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Слышно плохо, извините, это предел моего ныне телефона, но тут именно звук важен, я не мог это не запечатлеть 😁 Пояснительная бригада: я ему про Пинк, Агилеру, Гагу, он все послушал, ему понравилось и он включил камин Эмина и Джони 😂 он сам включил, я к этому вообще не причастен 😂 пришлось потом прогнать его по парочке моих любимых песен 😂
🤣25custom 521327400874463278214💅3
Встретились со Стилягой, он в жопе. Знаю, что тут были те, кто за него переживал, так вот новости подъехали. Он ждал больше года и его прокатили, отказ в убежище. Видимо по мнению сотрудников Офпра Афганистан довольно безопасен. Я конечно все понимаю, но конкретно этот чудик максимально европейский. Да, он верующий мусульманин, но из нормальных, без навязывание и осуждения. Он может не знать кто такие Леди Гага или …
custom 521327400874463278242💔9
4.20 утра, а я как обычно, сна ни в одном глазу и похер, что до этого спал 3 часа, а после весь день провёл в стирках, уборках, готовке и походах по нескольким магазинам. Устал? Да. Уснул? Нет, уставший пролежал. В последнее время у меня напрочь пропал политический контекст, но судя по моим коротким снам и чувству тревоги, ебет меня этот вопрос постоянно, а молчание нихуя не меняет. Высказывание, наверняка, тоже не …
custom 521327400874463278228🙈5🦄4💅2🤣2🗿1
Когда хочется приготовить что-нибудь на скорую руку и горящую жопу, то получается что-то такое. Ну золотые руки, просто золотые! 😁
custom 521327400874463278241🦄6
Чёт я на радостях разошелся в домашних делах. У нас по-прежнему жарко и продукты довольно быстро портятся. Жрать толком и не жру, но выбрасывать все равно жалко. Вернулся домой, начал перебирать овощи и фрукты и понимаю, что вот-вот половина, если не больше, испортится. Из помидоров сделал аджику-разорви-жопу, краснокачанную капусту, лук и холоппеньо отправил в быстрое маринование, сварил варенье из дыни, банана и …
custom 521327400874463278238🤣11
В общем-то теперь осталось решить вопрос только с телефоном, потому что этот в конце августа заберут, а после можно будет уже окончательно успокоиться. Не, ну, учитывая мой талант влипать в истории, что хоть сериал снимай, уверен, что спокойствие будет недолгим. Кто меня давно читает, вы бы такой сериал посмотрели? 😂
🤣28custom 52132740087446327827🙈1
Je suis ебать какой молодец, потому что подал необходимые документы на восстановление титра, сбегал в КАФ (те, что пособия начисляют) и убедился, что с пособием все хорошо и что в глазах Франции я все ещё молодец, а не безнадёжный придурок. Сейчас мне выдали временную бумагу до получения документа и я блин невероятно рад! Наконец-то!
custom 521327400874463278238💅2
Наконец-то удалось подать заявление в полицию! В очередной раз меня хотели отправить на сайт и приложение, но показав им несколько раз, что это нифига не работает, меня таки приняли в отделе. Благодаря этому завтра я могу пойти и подать документы на новый Титр Же Сижур и тем самым снять с себя самый лютый стресс. Аллилуйя. Даже словил приятное чувство, будто этот ёбанный клубок обстоятельств начинает наконец распу…
custom 521327400874463278250💔4
Я не ждал ничего от этого дня рождения, как-то так получилось, что все эти персональные праздники заканчивались слезами и болью. Но каждый год я даю новый шанс этому дню и стараюсь проводить его позитивно. Какой итог? Я пол дня проплакал. Не спеши утешать, потому что плакал я от счастья и радости. На меня обрушились поздравления со всего мира и это было не просто "с ДР!", люди делились своими чувствами, рассказывал…
custom 521327400874463278279🦄1
Ну, чо. 38 годиков, ёпта. Теперь я точно взрослый, но это не точно.
🦄66custom 521327400874463278214
Для тех, кто ещё в РФ, но планирует переезд. "Спасибо" диктаторам, но ужесточение в одной стране влияет на все остальные. Аргентина была лайт-версинй, но я выяснил, что с их стороны все очень сильно ужесточилось. Теперь недостаточно быть ущемленных по закону, нужно преследование (несмотря на женевскую конвенцию, которая гарантирует защиту прав и свобод). Смотрели в эту сторону? Смотрите теперь Бразилию. Уругвай и Па…
custom 521327400874463278234🦄5🤣4🗿3💅1
Привет, Бусинки. Персональный ад с полицией не прекращается, приложение так и не работает. То есть оно работает, но на финальную страницу так и не выбрасывает. Штош, ждём очередного понедельника, потому что завтра я не буду тратить свое время. У меня в планах прятаться под кроватью. Киргизский банк #Бакай уже третьи сутки решает проблему с привязкой моей карты к гугл пэй, и с места этот вопрос не сдвинулся. Но зато …
custom 521327400874463278235💅3🤣1🦄1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @neyasli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 399,517 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Немножко содомит” (@neyasli), 2,604 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neyasli.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.