https://www.reddit.com/r/real_China_irl/comments/vq8no9/如果上海免费数据是随机跳出来的那我可能发现了生育率的秘密

Channel
观望
@nexmoew
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
22subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001352373509 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nexmoew |
| Description | 思考、经常做些投票 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 6 February 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nexmoew |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 22 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:51 | 22 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 February 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 2
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
意大利报告:新冠死者几乎全部为退休人员 预计未来十年节约养老金119亿欧元 2月15日电,意大利参议院公布第9次《意大利养老金制度资产负债表报告》。报告指出,2020年该国因新冠肺炎死亡的人口中,65岁及以上的人占96.3%,几乎全部为退休人员,这使意大利社会保障局节省了11.1亿欧元的养老金支出。报告预计,到2029年的未来10年里,这部分支出将总共减少119亿欧元。
你吃饭前会去看点评吗?
- 经常26%
- 偶尔34%
- 从不40%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
有食堂里的很多窗口没去过
- 对,很多窗口没去过41%
- 有部分窗口没去过33%
- 基本所有窗口都去过26%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你知道你每餐想吃什么吗?
- 知道21%
- 不知道79%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你用 Windows10 的磁贴吗?
- 不用44%
- 很少用16%
- 用的不多14%
- 经常用27%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1dK4y1X7is
你考虑生小孩吗?
- 不打算结婚62%
- 结婚了不生18%
- 已经有小孩了21%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Photo, posted without a caption
仅仅比较QQ和微信,你更愿意用哪一个
- QQ67%
- 微信33%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你有报复性消费过吗?
- 有,很爽24%
- 有,后悔了20%
- 没有,理性的一批56%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
如果你的生命只剩下一天,你会怎么做
- 怀疑人生16%
- 玩个痛快27%
- 陪伴家人32%
- Fire!Fire!25%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nexmoew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 15 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
你吃饭前会去看点评吗?
- 经常26%
- 偶尔34%
- 从不40%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
有食堂里的很多窗口没去过
- 对,很多窗口没去过41%
- 有部分窗口没去过33%
- 基本所有窗口都去过26%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你知道你每餐想吃什么吗?
- 知道21%
- 不知道79%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你用 Windows10 的磁贴吗?
- 不用44%
- 很少用16%
- 用的不多14%
- 经常用27%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你考虑生小孩吗?
- 不打算结婚62%
- 结婚了不生18%
- 已经有小孩了21%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
仅仅比较QQ和微信,你更愿意用哪一个
- QQ67%
- 微信33%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2020 to 3 July 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 988,589 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“观望” (@nexmoew), 22 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nexmoew.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.