Поздравляем всех, кто успел Сочувствуем всем, кто нет и ждём на следующем потоке!😂❤️
🔥21❤14💘9💔3

Channel
@newsencebrand
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
21,653subscribers
+2,328 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1003154181689 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @newsencebrand |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/newsencebrand |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 21,653 | +52 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:40 | 21,601 | +72 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 21,529 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:18 | 21,532 | -24 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 21,556 | -1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 21,557 | -28 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 21,585 | -25 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:33 | 21,610 | -12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:55 | 21,622 | -19 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 21,641 | +14 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 21,627 | -30 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:44 | 21,657 | -124 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 21,781 | -60 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 21,841 | +36 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 21,805 | +133 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 21,672 | +631 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:29 | 21,041 | +424 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 20,617 | +198 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 20,419 | +364 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 20,055 | first reading |
88 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 88 (10 August 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 73,399 |
| Reactions total | 1,176 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 14:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,740 reactions across 77 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,704 | 62.2% | |
| 🔥 | 542 | 19.8% | |
| 🥰 | 139 | 5.07% | |
| 💔 | 108 | 3.94% | |
| 😍 | 57 | 2.08% | |
| 💘 | 50 | 1.82% | |
| 👍 | 40 | 1.46% | |
| 😁 | 37 | 1.35% | |
| 👏 | 32 | 1.17% | |
| 🌭 | 18 | 0.657% | |
| 🤝 | 13 | 0.474% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 88 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,740 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Поздравляем всех, кто успел Сочувствуем всем, кто нет и ждём на следующем потоке!😂❤️
🔥21❤14💘9💔3
Как сказал наш директор по продукту «блин, ньюсенс это как 19 айфон в мире маркетинга»😂 Ну как приятно!
❤25😁7💔6🔥4
3 часа как полный sold out Многие предоплаты пришлось вернуть, так как мест уже не было. Команда заботы передала, что отменила 83 заказа!! Всей командой благодарим за доверие и гордимся вашим решением! И уже с нетерпением ждём ваших результатов и самых сильных бренд-маркетологов рынка 🤍
❤46🔥3
НАЧАЛАСЬ ЭКСКУРСИЯ ПО ДОСТОПРИМЕЧАТЕЛЬНОСТЯМ NEW SENCE BRAND! Не буду спойлерить, что у нас там происходит, но советую зайти и проверить💔 ЗАЙТИ НА ЭФИР 👇 https://newsence.ru/openbrand https://start.bizon365.ru/room/139561/openbrand
❤7
10 минут, коллеги! Оооочень волнительный момент для сотен ребят и...для меня тоже, нетерпится посмотреть на новые лица 🤍 Будет очень тепло и я буду катастрофически много улыбаться!!!😂 Присоединяйтесь: ЗАЙТИ НА ЭФИР 👇 https://newsence.ru/openbrand https://start.bizon365.ru/room/139561/openbrand
🔥5
Что вы творите 🤪 У нас осталось всего 3 места на тариф «сырники со сметаной и вареньем» и 5 мест на тариф «сырники со сметаной» Кто внес предоплату — советуем вам поторопиться 🤍 Оставляем контакт службы заботы, если вдруг потеряли: 💌 [Написать в Telegram] 💌 [Написать в WhatsApp ]
🔥13
Через 2 часа официально начинается наше обучение и ученики уже готовятся к своему первому эфиру...вы же готовитесь? Я проверю 😂 За время набора на newsence.brand нам пришлось дважды увеличивать штат кураторов, так вас было много! Если у вас получится забрать последние места, вы счастливчики, знайте это!! Если хочется подглядеть за учениками и сделать финальный выбор - ждём вас на первом эфире-экскурсии 🤍 Поговори…
❤15
Мы готовы ко всему!!🌀 На NEW SENCE BRAND во всех уроках есть дополнительные конспекты, рабочие тетради, таблички, шаблоны, списки, чтобы на каждом этапе у вас был готовый план. Просто берите и применяйте без вопросов «А что написать клиенту?», «А что делать с ответами после кастдевов?», «А как оформить договор?» Они идут в каждом модуле программы — пишите слово «МЕСТО» в отдел заботы, они все расскажут и заброниру…
❤9👍3🔥3
Я извиняюсь, но наши студенты в первый день окупают обучение, продав услугу по бренд-стратегии!! А с нашей программой, я точно знаю, что студенты сделают потрясающие стратегии и клиенты их ещё ни раз порекомендуют 🤍
🔥27❤13😁12
Нашу выпускницу взяли работать в Forbes!!! Недавно Forbes разместили вакансию маркетолога в чате наших выпускников) это была эксклюзивная вакансия, поскольку больше они нигде её не анонсировали и не выкладывали. Позвали работать нашу студентку Киру, для которой это первый проект, на newsence она пришла без опыта) Вот теперь рассказывайте мне, что крупные бренды не берут себе новичков😂 Закрываем набор уже завтра в …
❤23🔥11😍5
УЖЕ ЗАВТРА ПРОЙДЕТ ПЕРВЫЙ ЭФИР NEW SENCE BRAND И У НАС ЕСТЬ ПОДАРОК 🤍 Наши будущие бренд-маркетологи уже готовятся к своему первому организационному эфиру, который пройдёт завтра в 12:00...и мы с командой решили пригласить туда вас — устроить настоящую ЭКСКУРСИЮ В NEW SENCE: // Погрузимся в программу и расписание // Познакомимся с главными правилами курса // Поговорим о принципах, которые позволят пройти курс эффек…
❤41🔥13
Собрали для вас больше 100 кейсов ребят Все с разным бэкграундом и уровнем, но с общим желанием ПРИЙТИ К РЕЗУЛЬТАТУ Ребята разобрались, как выходить на крупные бренды, продавать им себя ЗА ДОРОГО и делать результат. И в основе этого лежит структура, которую мы разработали сначала под себя и своё агентство, а потом уже начали передавать ученикам [ПОСМОТРЕТЬ КЕЙСЫ ТУТ] И если вы хотите забрать и применить эту струк…
❤7🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 88 posts we hold for @newsencebrand. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@newsencebrand edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Для кого вы будете делать бренд-карту?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вы можете провести только одно исследование перед запуском нового бренда. Что даст наибольшую вероятность успеха?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
А как думаете, в каких из этих ниш больше денег для бренд-маркетолога?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
С какими нишами вы бы хотели работать? Что притягивает больше всего?
The shares total 202%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 31 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NewSence Brand” (@newsencebrand), 21,653 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newsencebrand.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.