Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for REX talks (RΞX MAIN)

Supergroup

REX talks (RΞX MAIN)

@newrextoken

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

1,888members

-64 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

81 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001769226972
TypeSupergroup
Username@newrextoken
DescriptionWeclome to RΞX - Advanced staking. Looking and fighting for success, developing every day. Helpful community. CMs will NEVER DM you. bsc-rex.io is our website. Welcome!
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded22 September 2026
Last confirmed live22 September 2026
Measurements held14
On Telegramt.me/newrextoken

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8881,9521,9207 August 2026 — 1,952 members8 August 2026 — 1,950 members11 August 2026 — 1,945 members14 August 2026 — 1,937 members17 August 2026 — 1,933 members20 August 2026 — 1,928 members23 August 2026 — 1,923 members27 August 2026 — 1,919 members30 August 2026 — 1,917 members2 September 2026 — 1,913 members6 September 2026 — 1,904 members11 September 2026 — 1,899 members15 September 2026 — 1,888 members22 September 2026 — 1,888 members7 August 202622 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 46 days, net -64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,878–1,962 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
22 Sept 2026, 02:311,888no change
15 Sept 2026, 08:201,888-11
11 Sept 2026, 08:171,899-5
6 Sept 2026, 18:571,904-9
2 Sept 2026, 10:041,913-4
30 Aug 2026, 03:431,917-2
27 Aug 2026, 05:451,919-4
23 Aug 2026, 22:351,923-5
20 Aug 2026, 13:471,928-5
17 Aug 2026, 18:371,933-4
14 Aug 2026, 08:281,937-8
11 Aug 2026, 11:271,945-5
8 Aug 2026, 02:441,950-2
7 Aug 2026, 05:291,952first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“REX talks (RΞX MAIN)” (@newrextoken), 1,888 members as measured 22 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newrextoken.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.