🤔 Дать прямой слот команде из Казахстана на МСС — 1000IQ МУВ 📝 Fatalist Приглашение команды из Казахстана — отличный ход для развития всего региона в целом. Фактически то, что основным сервером выбирает ру мск, убивает весь интерес и желание активного вовлечения в компетитив от стран ЦА, где за последний год проходит очень много активностей. Казахстан в этом преуспел больше всего, принимая Игры Будущего (так ещё и I…

Channel
FLORET NEWS
@newfloret
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12,058subscribers
-63 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002496841279 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @newfloret |
| Description | ⚡️ FLORET — портал для всех, кто увлекается киберспортом! 💼 По рекламе: @glosssweet 📬 Предложка в лс сообщества. 🧰 Владелец канала: @kidara666 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/newfloret |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 12,058 | -11 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 12,069 | -19 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 12,088 | -8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 12,096 | -11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 12,107 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:51 | 12,115 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:50 | 12,119 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 12,121 | first reading |
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 24.1%
- avg views ÷ 12,058 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,910
- 36 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.43%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 37
- of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (1 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 104,709 |
| Reactions total | 2,545 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 03:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,910
- Videos
- ≈356
- Links
- ≈4,650
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 5m 29s
- Average length
- 1m 50s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,977 reactions across 31 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,032 | 52.2% | |
| ⚡ | 451 | 22.8% | |
| 🤣 | 105 | 5.31% | |
| 🔥 | 104 | 5.26% | |
| ✍ | 78 | 3.95% | |
| 👍 | 70 | 3.54% | |
| 🗿 | 50 | 2.53% | |
| 🤡 | 24 | 1.21% | |
| 🤩 | 23 | 1.16% | |
| 🙏 | 14 | 0.708% | |
| 🎉 | 9 | 0.455% | |
| custom 5391036425883889682 | 5 | 0.253% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 0.253% | |
| 😈 | 3 | 0.152% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 0.101% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.101% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,545reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
❓ Кто же станет чемпионом в этом сезоне? Ждем ваши предположения в комментариях.
❤54⚡3✍2🔥1🤩1
🗣️ Geass и остальные обиделись на то, что Rune Eaters получили прямой слот на МСС 🗣️ — такое мнение высказал один из игроков Казахстана. 🙄 Большая часть комментарием под тиктоком оставлена в негативном ключе. Справедливо? ✅ FLORET NEWS
🗿27❤9👍5🤣3🔥2🤡1
Почему именно мой проект? * Один общий адрес для Java и Bedrock - mc.smetanduck.net. * Один из самых высоких уровней DDoS-защиты, благодаря чему сервер остаётся доступным даже во время атак. * Мощная инфраструктура и стабильный TPS даже при большом онлайне. * Без Pay to Win - донат не ломает баланс и не даёт решающего преимущества. * Постоянная разработка и регулярные обновления, а не проект "на пару недель". * В бл…
🤡15✍9❤5👍2🗿2⚡1🔥1🙏1
Что-то подсказывает, что это будет самый интересный сезон МСС 😁 ✅ FLORET NEWS
⚡36❤6✍5🗿2👍1🔥1
❗️ Закрытые квалификации MCC, подытожим составы команд 👇 👆Omnix: Juno Neks Whoopty Dead Yoza 👆CyberHero: Repa Maniak Reaper Avilio Showme 👆Aura Farmers: Summer inneskayt Baratrumm Neil Tenna ⬅️ У какого из коллективов больше шанс на выход в основную стадию турнира? ✅ FLORET NEWS
❤16⚡3✍1🎉1👍1🔥1
🤯 Третий состав прошедший в закрытые квалификации — AKEOLA Academy 👆 Состав команды: Bеrt Kidd Kuroro Saba Shawn ✅ FLORET NEWS
⚡18❤4🤡3✍1👍1🔥1🗿1custom 53910364258838896821
😤 «Уберите из игры героев для хуесосов, которые садятся на убийц и душат» — Repa составил список неприятных героев. ⬅️ Первым делом я удалил бы мурчалок, которые выхиливают 100% мертвых челов, и не дают сноуболиться. 🎉 Данилу сегодня исполнилось 20 лет, поэтому поздравляем игрока в комментариях и составляем свой список героев, которых стоит удалить из MLBB 👇 ✅ FLORET NEWS
❤24🤣6👍4⚡1🔥1🗿1
🗓 Расписание финального дня GotF ✅ FLORET NEWS
❤20⚡2👍2✍1🔥1
🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: 1. 金木 ᴋᴀɴᴇᴋɪ (@nick_collins) 2. Rasta (@Rastamlbb) 3. 🍌╥﹏╥🍌 (@Defeat10) 4. Softer Insaide (@Temperament03) 5. KE1JO (@KE1JO_O) 6. Mr_Goodman (@andrey_gorupa) 7. Ричард (@KiViPeNs) 8. Дмитрий (@Avrilaze) 9. Shokouu. (@miikorq) 10. ᅠᅠᅠсурни. (@yessyes) ✔️Проверить результаты
❤9custom 53910364258838896823🗿1😱1
По итогам первого дня открытой квалификации победителями вышли Rakuzan & Invision 👆 Состав команды Rakuzan Mashiro Loveeely gxn1us Solitude Dont 👆 Состав команды Invision Shelianer Nagib Solist shvedskii Adrenaline Сегодня нас ожидает второй круг квалификации на региональный турнир. ✅ FLORET NEWS
🔥24❤2⚡1🤡1🤩1
НОВЫЙ 🐔 КАЙЯ — ПИК ИЛИ БАН ГЕРОЙ. Делимся в комментариях рассуждениями о новых способностях героя 👇 ✅ FLORET NEWS
✍28❤4🔥4⚡2🤡1😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @newfloret. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 14,396 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@loungemlbb · 4642 postsLyubon (дерти сквош)
@lyubon_mlbb · 1,1522 postsNovel
@alexxnovel · 1531 postFloret Bet
@floretbet · 3551 postMagistor
@magistorkaga · 8,6441 postпанИшер
@PanisherMLbb · 231 postБудка свиньи🕉️
@pidornegrr · 91 postРепаголовый
@RepaAsUsual · 1521 postшалаш шпуки шупи шпуни шпива шпица шпрота shpui
@shalashshpui · 2,1091 postTeam Yandex MLBB
@team_yandex_mlbb · 25,8041 postTroublemaker
@Troublemakermlbb · 3,4751 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@shalashshpui · 2,1092 postsБелая BEERлога
@alex_white_official · 2,2571 postПодвал Danzel'a MLBB
@danzelpodval · 2,2741 postHiko
@h1komlbb · 29,8981 postk1dara
@kidara666 · 1381 postMlbb lounge
@loungemlbb · 4641 postRandomize Bot 🎲 [Рандомайзер]
@randomized · 3,479,1281 postРепаголовый
@RepaAsUsual · 1521 postKIDBOMBER
@tskidbomber · 9,2251 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FLORET NEWS” (@newfloret), 12,058 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newfloret.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.